MCQ 27 Consider the following game in which two firms (OLD and NEW) are considering whether or not to advertise to increase sales. Each firm knows that the impact on profits depends on what the other firm chooses to do. The possible profit outcomes of the game are shown below, with OLD's profits shown as the first number in each pair and NEW's profits shown as the second number: NEW Advertise Not Advertise Advertise 10, 5 15, 1 OLD Not Advertise 5, 8 20, 3 Assuming the firms aim to earn as much profit as possible, which of the following is TRUE for the game? A I do not want to answer this question. B OLD's dominant strategy is to advertise C OLD's dominant strategy is not to advertise D NEW's dominant strategy is not to advertise E NEW's dominant strategy is to advertise F the dominant strategy for both OLD and NEW is to advertise

MCQ 27 Consider the following game in which two firms (OLD and NEW) are considering whether or not to advertise to increase sales. Each firm knows that the impact on profits depends on what the other firm chooses to do. The possible profit outcomes of the game are shown below, with OLD's profits shown as the first number in each pair and NEW's profits shown as the second number: NEW Advertise Not Advertise Advertise 10, 5 15, 1 OLD Not Advertise 5, 8 20, 3 Assuming the firms aim to earn as much profit as possible, which of the following is TRUE for the game? A I do not want to answer this question. B OLD's dominant strategy is to advertise C OLD's dominant strategy is not to advertise D NEW's dominant strategy is not to advertise E NEW's dominant strategy is to advertise F the dominant strategy for both OLD and NEW is to advertise

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Assume there are two firms X and Y, considering which of two alternative prices to charge, £25 or £19 for X and £20 or £15 for Y. The firms make their decisions simultaneously: i.e. neither firm knows the price choice of its rival. The various profits are illustrated in the following pay-off matrix: Strategies and payoffs for X are in blue and for Y in red. (a) What is firm Y’s best response to each of the two different prices firm X could charge? Does firm Y have a dominant strategy? (b)What is firm X’s best response to each of the different prices firm Y could charge? Does firm X have a dominant strategy? (C) What is/are the Nash equilibrium/equilbria? What is the most likely outcome of this game? Explain your answer.
Q13 George and Jerry are competitors in a local market. Each is trying to decide if it is better to advertise on TV, on radio, or not at all. If they both advertise on TV, each will earn a profit of €3,000. If they both advertise on radio, each will earn a profit of €5,000. If neither advertises at all, each will earn a profit of €10,000. If one advertises on TV and the other advertises on radio, then the one advertising on TV will earn €4,000 and the other will earn €2,000. If one advertises on TV and the other does not advertise, then the one advertising on TV will earn €8,000 and the other will earn €5,000. If one advertises on radio and the other does not advertise, then the one advertising on radio will earn €9,000 and the other will earn €6,000. If both follow their dominant strategy, then George will: (a) advertise on TV and earn €3,000; (b) advertise on radio and earn €5,000; (c) advertise on TV and earn €8,000; (d) not advertise and earn €10,000;
q13-
Refer to the normal-form game of price competition shown below. Introduce A Do Not Introduce B Clone Do Not Clone (5,5) (-10, 50) (500,0) Firm A must decide whether or not to introduce a new product. If firm A introduces a new product, firm B must decide whether or not to clone the product. The subgame perfect Nash equilibrium to this game is: Firm A plays "Do Not Introduce"; firm B plays "Clone" if firm A plays "Introduce." Firm A plays "Do Not Introduce"; firm B plays "Do Not Clone" if firm A plays "Introduce." Firm A plays "Introduce"; firm B plays "Clone" if firm A plays "Introduce." Firm A plays "Introduce"; firm B plays "Do Not Clone" if firm A plays "Introduce."
Q17
Suppose that there are two firms in a market, firm 1 and firm 2. The marketis declining in size. The game starts in period 0, and the firms can compete in periods 0, 1,2, 3, ... (i.e., indefinitely) if they so choose. Duopoly profits in period t for firm 1 are equalto 105 −10t, and they are 10.5 −t for firm 2. Monopoly profits (those if a firm is the onlyone left in the market) are 510 −25t for firm 1 and 51 −2t for firm 2. At the start of eachperiod, each firm must decide either to “stay in” or “exit” if it is still active (they do sosimultaneously if both are still active). Once a firm exits, it is out of the market forever andearns zero in each period thereafter. Firms maximize their (undiscounted) sum of profits.What is this game’s subgame perfect Nash equilibrium?
Three firms share a market. The demand function is P(q1, 92, 93) = 10 – q1 – 92 – 93, where q; is the output of firm i, Player i. The marginal cost per unit for each firm is zero. Suppose firm 1 is a market leader, and that firm 2, and firm 3 choose q2 and q3 simultaneously after observing q1 Find the SPE of this game. How much is produced by firm 2? Numerical answer How much is produced by firm 1, 2, and 3?
(J)
Before entry, the incumbent earns a monopoly profit of $20 (profits in millions). If entry occurs, the incumbent and rival each earn the duopoly profit, $6. Suppose that the incumbent can induce the government to require all firms to install pollution-control devices that cost each firm $8. Should the incumbent urge the government to require pollution-control devices? Why or why not? Enter -(6,6) Assume for simplicity the game tree is illustrated in the figure to the right. All profits are Rival in millions. What is the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium? No devices (20,0) Don't enter O A. The Nash equilibrium is for the incumbent to require devices and for the rival to not enter regardless of whether devices are required. Incumbent Enter -(-2,-2) O B. The Nash equilibrium is for the incumbent to require devices and for the rival to only enter if devices are not required. Devices Rival OC. The Nash equilibrium is for the incumbent to not require devices and for the (12,0) rival to only…
While there is a degree of differentiation between major grocery chains like Albertsons and Kroger, the regular offering of sale prices by both firms for many of their products provides evidence that these firms engage in price competition. For markets where Albertsons and Kroger are the dominant grocers, this suggests that these two stores similtaneously announce one of two prices for a given product: a regular price or a sale price. Suppose that when one firm announces the sale price and the other annoucements the regular price for a particular product, the firm announcing the sale price attracts 1,000 extra customers to earn a profit of $5,000, compared to the $3,000 earned by the firm announcing the regular price. When both firms announce the sale price, the two firms split the market equally (each getting an extrs 500 customers) to earn profits of $2,000 each. When both firms announce the regular price, each company attracts only its 1,500 loyal customers and the firms each earn…
6)Game Theory: The Prisoners’ Dilemma: Assume that the Wilson and Spalding athletic equipment companies are in a one-shot game for market share and profits, but that they have the option of choosing only one of two possible price strategies for basketballs: $20 or $80. Obviously if they choose different strategies, the firm with the lower price will win the entire market. The firms face the following payoff matrix (See Chap. 10). Wilson\ \Spalding Wilson $ 20 Price Wilson $ 80 Price Spalding $ 20 Price $ 400, $ 400 $ 1500, $ 0 Spalding $ 80 Price $ 0, $ 1500 $ 1000, $ 1000 What strategy will each firm choose? Why? Which strategy is dominant? Which strategy is preferred by each firm? What will be the outcome of the one-shot game? Where is the Nash equilibrium? Which outcome would be best for the two firms? What will happen if the game is repeated an infinite number of times?
INFINITE REPETITION Consider the infinitely repeated game constructed from the following stage game. b1 b2 a1 8,8 3,13 a2 13,3 0,0 Suppose that both players use the discount factor d to evaluate future payoff streams. What is the smallest value of 5 such that there exists a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium in which the action profile is played in all periods? (Please report your answer in decimal form, rounded if necessary to the nearest 0.01.)