MBy = 600 – ( Ey / 3 ) Note that these marginal benefit figures can be interpreted as marginal cost of a emission down to levels Ex and Ey. Government regulators want to reduce total sulfur dioxide emissions to a total o tons. a) If the government imposes the same standard of 900 tons maximum emi both firms what would be the total cost of abatement (calculated as the a marginal benefits forgone)? b) If the government distributed 900 tradable pollution permits (one ton ea each firm what would be the final allocation of these permits after the fi them? What would be the total cost of abatement in this latter case?

MBy = 600 – ( Ey / 3 ) Note that these marginal benefit figures can be interpreted as marginal cost of a emission down to levels Ex and Ey. Government regulators want to reduce total sulfur dioxide emissions to a total o tons. a) If the government imposes the same standard of 900 tons maximum emi both firms what would be the total cost of abatement (calculated as the a marginal benefits forgone)? b) If the government distributed 900 tradable pollution permits (one ton ea each firm what would be the final allocation of these permits after the fi them? What would be the total cost of abatement in this latter case?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

No hand written solution Afirm has an industrial plant that emits pollutants into a town’s lake. The plant’s marginal abatement function is MAC= 200 – 0.5E and damages caused by its emissions are given by MD = 2E where emissions are in kg. per day. What is the socially efficient level of emissions from this plant? Illustrate this in a graph. As an incentive to reduce emissions to the socially efficient level, government offers to pay the firm for each kg. of emissions it abates per day from this plant. What subsidy per kg. should the government offer? If the plant abates to the socially efficient level of emissions, what total subsidy payment would the firm receive? Identify the area in your graph. How much better or worse off would the firm be compared to if it did no abating? Identify the area in your graph. What would be the net benefit to society if we pay the firm to reduce the plant’s emissions to the socially efficient level? Identify this area in your graph.
Suppose that a firm's marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is MAC = 8 - E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, then its marginal abatement cost function will become MAC = 4 - 0.5E. With an emissions tax of $2, the benefits of adopting the new technologies equal $_ Please round your final answer to two decimal places if necessary. Answer:
Suppose there are only two polluting firms, called A and B, with the following marginal abatement costs: 1602AA MACe=− and 100BB MACe=−, where A e represents firm A’s emissions in tons and B e represents firm B’s emissions in tons. Suppose the government wishes to ensure that the two firms together emit 60 tons of the pollutant and uses a Tradable Emission Permit (TEP) policy. Assume that each TEP allows its holder to emit 1 ton, and that the market for permits is perfectly competitive. a. Suppose the government initially distributes the total number of TEPs it issues equally between the two firms. The permits are distributed free of charge. Once trade in permits takes place, what will be the equilibrium in the market for TEPs (i.e. which firm will buy how many TEPs from the other, and at what price)? b. Briefly describe three problems of setting up a TEP market.
To model the effects of a carbon tax on CO2 emissions, policymakers study the marginal cost of abatement B(x), defined as the cost of increas- ing CO2 reduction from x to x +1 tons (in units of ten thousand tons- Figure 4). Which quantity is represented by the area under the curve over [0, 3] in Figure 4? B(x) ($/ton) 100 75 50+ 25- 1 3 Tons reduced (ten thousands) FIGURE 4 Marginal cost of abatement B(x).
Suppose that a firm's marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is MAC = 12 - E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, then its marginal abatement cost function will become MAC = 6 - %3D 0.5E. With an emissions tax of $4, the benefits of adopting the new technologies equal $. Please round your final answer to two decimal places if necessary. Answer:
In a market for chemicals, the demand function is P = 200 – Q. The private marginal cost for the chemicals produ cers is MCP = 50 + Q. Pollution generated during the production process causes external marginal cost for the society equal to MCE = 3Q. 4. (a) What specific tax would resultin a competitive market producing the socially optimal quantity of chemicals? Instead of taxation, whatelse can the government do to make sure that the market will work itself out to achieve the socially optimal output? (b)
I need help with g and h
The figure above shows a national marketable permit system for carbon dioxide. If marginal abatement costs turn out to be high and the government does supply annual permits, what will be the price of a permit? Permit Price ($/ton) S D2 P2 = 600 P7 = 300 A P, = 150 1 %3D D Quantity of Permits 50 QT 75 Q2 100 (% of uncontrolled emissions) OA. P1 Ов. Р2 OC. PT OD. PO O E. Either P0 or P1. B
2, = 160,000 – 2000P and Qs=40,000+2000P, where Q, is the quantity demanded in 100-pound lots, Q, is the quantity supplied in 100-pound lots, and P is the price per 100-pound lot. Currently there is no attempt to regulate the dumping of effluent into streams and rivers by the paper mills. As a result, dumping is widespread. The marginal external cost (MEC) associated with the production of paper is given by the curve MEC=0.0006Qs- a. Calculate the output and price of paper if it is produced under competitive conditions and no attempt is made to monitor or regulate the dumping of effluent. b. Determine the socially efficient price and output of paper. c. Explain why the answers you calculated in parts a and b differ.
Imagine a firm's marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 200 - 10E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 100 - SE. With a tax on emissions of $20, the benefits of adopting the new technologies equal: Select one: a. $30. b. $20. c. $25. d. $50.
Imagine a firm’s marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 12 – E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 6 – 0.5E. The adoption costs for the new technology are $6. If the government raises the tax on emissions from $2 to $4, the firm's total costs increase by $_____. HINT: Total costs include tax payments, total abatement costs, and (if relevant) adoption costs for the new technology. Select one: a. $12. b. $8. c. $10. d. $16.
Which of the following is not an objective of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) under the Clean Air Act? Equate the marginal benefits of pollution abatement with the marginal costs of abatement. New emissions sources must meet different performance standards than existing sources. O Establish a specific control technology to limit emissions of conventional pollutants from individual sources. States were responsible to develop state implementation plans to achieve the standards. Areas that did not meet the standards were designated nonattainment regions. Protect human health with an adequate margin of safety.