The Filthy Chemical Company dumps 100 tons of pollutants every year in the Pristine Lake. The Trout Fishing Co., the only other user of the lake,estimates that if Q tons of pollution were cleaned up every year its profits would rise according to the relation Filthy estimates it can clean the pollutants at constant average costs of $2 per ton. (a) In the interest of efficiency, how much pollution should be cleaned up every year? (b) Suppose Filthy bought Trout. How much would it clean up? What if Trout bought Filthy?

The Filthy Chemical Company dumps 100 tons of pollutants every year in the Pristine Lake. The Trout Fishing Co., the only other user of the lake,estimates that if Q tons of pollution were cleaned up every year its profits would rise according to the relation Filthy estimates it can clean the pollutants at constant average costs of $2 per ton. (a) In the interest of efficiency, how much pollution should be cleaned up every year? (b) Suppose Filthy bought Trout. How much would it clean up? What if Trout bought Filthy?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

question 3
8.1 Suppose we have an agricultural valley 100 km by 50 km, with a polluting electricity power plant. The power plant causes pollution problems in a narrow strip of land downwind of the plant, and within this valley. 10 km in length and 500 m in width, but no problems outside of that area. The total effect of the pollution is to make crop land less productive. If we were to clean up the pollution, would we expect land prices to increase? Where? Would we expect wages to decline? Would the changes in land prices and/or wages fully reflect the benefits of cleaning up the pollution? Why or why not?
1. How does the provision of public goods at the local level affect their optimality?
Im confused on this question.
Define pollution charge and will our economy be able to control pollution? Share your thoughts in a paragraph.
Q) Imagine any number of identical boats can fish along the North Carolina coast. The value of fishing (V) per boat as a function of the number of boats (N) is: V = 50 − 5N. The marginal value (MV) to the fishery of an additional boat is: MV = 50 − 10N. For each boat, the costs of fishing (C) are $10. If the fishery were managed in a way that only the socially efficient # of boats are allowed to enter the fishery, what would be the net value (i.e., total value minus total costs) of the fishery? Solve it early. Not in excel
Only typed answer You are an industry analyst that specializes in an industry where the market inverse demand is P = 100 - 3Q. The external marginal cost of producing the product is MCExternal = 6Q, and the internal cost is MCInternal = 14Q. Instruction: Round your answers to the nearest two decimal places. a. What is the socially efficient level of output? units b. Given these costs and market demand, how much output would a competitive industry produce? units c. Given these costs and market demand, how much output would a monopolist produce? units d. Which of the following are actions the government could take to induce firms in this industry to produce the socially efficient level of output. Instructions: You may select more than one answer. Click the box with a check mark for the correct answers and click twice to empty the box for the wrong answers. You must click to select or deselect each option in order to receive full credit. Pollution taxes…
Imagine a firm’s marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 100 – 2E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 50 – E. If the government raises the tax on emissions from $4 to $12, the benefits of adopting the new technologies increase by $____
There are two factories in a small town. Both of them emit carbon dioxide into the air. Their current monthly emissions, as well as their total costs for reducing emissions in 20-ton increments, are listed in the tables below. Factory 1 Current emissions (tons/month) 120 Total cost of reducing emissions by 20 tons/month $50 Total cost of reducing emissions by 40 tons/month Total cost of reducing emissions by 60 tons/month Total cost of reducing emissions by 80 tons/month Total cost of reducing emissions by 100 tons/month $150 $270 $410 $570 Factory 2 Current emissions (tons/month) 160 Total cost of reducing emissions by 20 tons/month $20 Total cost of reducing emissions by 40 tons/month $60 Total cost of reducing emissions by 60 tons/month $110 Total cost of reducing emissions by 80 tons/month $200 Total cost of reducing emissions by 100 tons/month $300
Firm A currently dumps 243 tons of chemicals into the local river. Firm B currently dumps 126 tons of chemicals into the local river. The government has decided to reduce the pollution and from now on will require a pollution permit for each ton of pollution dumped into the river. The government gives Firm A 61 pollution permits and gives Firm B 65 pollution permits. The abatement costs of one ton of pollution is $113 for Firm A and $165 for Firm B. What would be the total cost of reducing pollution, if the government does NOT allow the firm to trade the permits between each other?
1) Since Mr. Leon polluted a lake the government has to clean up his mess. The following are the total benefits and costs associated with cleaning up his mess. % Cleaned Total Benefits Total Costs 20 50,000 500 40 90,000 1500 60 100,000 3,000 80 107,000 10,000 100 110,000 20,000 A)What amount should the government clean up? To answer this you must first calculate the marginal benefits and marginal costs associated with the clean up of the lake.
5) Mr. Leon is at it again! He vandalized a public park. Now society has to clean it up. Based on the numbers below what would be the socially optimal amount that should be cleaned up? % cleaned total benefits total costs 25 $10,000 $1,000 50 $15,000 $4,000 75 $18,000 $7,000 100 $19,000 $10,000 *Show the marginal benefits and marginal costs, graphically.