Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Social Science
History
лу рес ms in fthe st: rights. by ti electe These state group bove oups Ives

лу рес ms in fthe st: rights. by ti electe These state group bove oups Ives

icon
Related questions
Question
21.) What happened to the trading relationship between the U.S. and other countries?
Such activities prevented efficient and productive trade a Ma across state lines. It also worsened the economy, which was still recovering from the devastation of the war. &. Threats to citizens'right to property. Many people believed that one of the most serious problems in the United States during the 1780s was the failure of the state governments to protect their citizens' property rights. In most states the government was controlled by the legislative branch, composed of representatives elected of Sha The coul Som People with common interests formed factions. These factions sometimes formed majorities in the state legislatures. James Madison defined a faction as a group of people that seeks to promote its own interests above the interests of other individuals or groups. These groups were accused of making laws that benefited themselves at the expense of the minority and of the common good. For example, they passed laws that canceled debts and that confiscated the property of loyalists. They created paper money causing inflation that benefited debtors at реop. prope- by a majority of the people. Shays They Massa militia. rebellio. similar the expense of their creditors. People hurt by such laws argued that their property was not being protected by their state governments. They claimed that the state governments were being used by one class of people to deny the rights of others. Some people argued that these problems were the result of too much democracy in the state governments. They claimed that representative government with majority rule did not adequately protect the natural rights of individual citizens or the common good. They argued that majority rule, when the majority pursued its own selfish interests at the expense of the rights of others, was just another form of tyranny, every bit as dangerous that of an uncontrolled king. as What do you think? 1. The Articles of Confederation demonstrated a distrust of a strong national government. What were the historical and philosophical reasons for this distrust? 2. What were the positive and negative consequences of a weak national govermment? 3. Why do you think the smaller states were satisfied with government under the Articles of Why did Sha the weaknes. Confederation? The fears raised by combined with di regulating foreign tr people to strengther Washington Madiso 4. Many people today continue to distrust the federal government. In your opinion, is such distrust justified? Explain your position. wan
Transcribed Image Text:Such activities prevented efficient and productive trade a Ma across state lines. It also worsened the economy, which was still recovering from the devastation of the war. &. Threats to citizens'right to property. Many people believed that one of the most serious problems in the United States during the 1780s was the failure of the state governments to protect their citizens' property rights. In most states the government was controlled by the legislative branch, composed of representatives elected of Sha The coul Som People with common interests formed factions. These factions sometimes formed majorities in the state legislatures. James Madison defined a faction as a group of people that seeks to promote its own interests above the interests of other individuals or groups. These groups were accused of making laws that benefited themselves at the expense of the minority and of the common good. For example, they passed laws that canceled debts and that confiscated the property of loyalists. They created paper money causing inflation that benefited debtors at реop. prope- by a majority of the people. Shays They Massa militia. rebellio. similar the expense of their creditors. People hurt by such laws argued that their property was not being protected by their state governments. They claimed that the state governments were being used by one class of people to deny the rights of others. Some people argued that these problems were the result of too much democracy in the state governments. They claimed that representative government with majority rule did not adequately protect the natural rights of individual citizens or the common good. They argued that majority rule, when the majority pursued its own selfish interests at the expense of the rights of others, was just another form of tyranny, every bit as dangerous that of an uncontrolled king. as What do you think? 1. The Articles of Confederation demonstrated a distrust of a strong national government. What were the historical and philosophical reasons for this distrust? 2. What were the positive and negative consequences of a weak national govermment? 3. Why do you think the smaller states were satisfied with government under the Articles of Why did Sha the weaknes. Confederation? The fears raised by combined with di regulating foreign tr people to strengther Washington Madiso 4. Many people today continue to distrust the federal government. In your opinion, is such distrust justified? Explain your position. wan
power to tax. All it could do was request that state develop our present Constitution. These limitations are ndered their western claims did Maryland ratify the This system did not work. Congress had borrowed most deal with their fear of a strong national government- difficulties that arose under them led to the decision to power. This reflected their belief that power that is not The limitations of the Articles of Confederation and the You have seen how the people of the states attempted to they created a national government that had very limited to be under the control of Congress, not of individual ratify the Articles. Maryland had wanted western lands On March 1, 1781, Maryland became the last state to Pg. 54-59 Each bolded ronsider creating after their f government? M the Articles of Confederation created? What were weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation? 2. No power over the state governments and their citizens. Congress did not have the power to make laws regulating the behavior of citizens or the states or to force state governments or their citizens to do anything. The citizens could be governed only by their own state governments. This meant that if members of a state government or citizens within a state disobeyed a resolution, recommendation, or request made by the national government, there was no way the national government could make them obey. The Articles clearly stated that each state kept its "sovereignty, freedom, and independence." under atil New York, Connecticut, and Virginia ticles of set of r Articles is power that cannot be misused. se A The national government's inability to make state governments and their citizens live up to treaties it had made led to a serious situation. Not all of the colonists had been in favor of the Revolutionary War, some had remained loyal to Great Britain. Thousands of these people, called loyalists, still lived in the United States When the war was over, the national government signed a peace treaty with Great Britain called the Treaty of Paris. It was intended in part to protect loyalists' rights and ensure that they were treated fairly. Some of these loyalists owned property in the states and some had loaned money to other citizens. ult described below. . No money and no power to get it. Congress had no emments pay certain amounts to support the costs of the national government. fthe money it needed to pay for the Revolutionary War fom Americans and foreigners, but had no way to pay is debts. The state governments and many of the people iving in the states were also deeply in debt after the war. Therefore, when Congress requested $10 million from he states to pay for the costs of fighting the war, the sates paid only $1.5 million. Some state governments refused to respect this treaty. They often made it difficult for loyalists to collect the money owed to them by other citizens. In some cases the states had confiscated the loyalists' property during the war. The national government had no power to force the state governments to respect the property rights of the loyalists or to force individual citizens to pay back money owed to the loyalists. Thus, the national government was powerless to live up to its promise to the British government to protect the rights of these citizens. CONGRESS 3. Unenforceable trade agreements. Although Congress had the power to make agreements with foreign nations, it did not have the power to make state governments live up to these agreements. This raised another difficulty. Some citizens imported goods from other nations and then refused to pay for them. Not surprisingly, people in foreign countries became reluctant to trade with people in the United States. In addition, when Great Britain recognized how weak Congress was in controlling foreign trade, it closed the West Indies to American commerce. As a result, many Americans lost money because they were unable to sell their goods to people in other nations. Others were not able to buy goods from abroad. STATES GIVE 4. Unfair competition among the states. Congress had no power to make laws regulating trade among the states. As a result, some states levied taxes on goods passing through them to other states. For example, both New York and Pennsylvania taxed goods going to New Jersey which was compared to “a keg tapped at both ends." was Congress's ability to govern hurt by not beng able to collect taxes from the states?
Transcribed Image Text:power to tax. All it could do was request that state develop our present Constitution. These limitations are ndered their western claims did Maryland ratify the This system did not work. Congress had borrowed most deal with their fear of a strong national government- difficulties that arose under them led to the decision to power. This reflected their belief that power that is not The limitations of the Articles of Confederation and the You have seen how the people of the states attempted to they created a national government that had very limited to be under the control of Congress, not of individual ratify the Articles. Maryland had wanted western lands On March 1, 1781, Maryland became the last state to Pg. 54-59 Each bolded ronsider creating after their f government? M the Articles of Confederation created? What were weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation? 2. No power over the state governments and their citizens. Congress did not have the power to make laws regulating the behavior of citizens or the states or to force state governments or their citizens to do anything. The citizens could be governed only by their own state governments. This meant that if members of a state government or citizens within a state disobeyed a resolution, recommendation, or request made by the national government, there was no way the national government could make them obey. The Articles clearly stated that each state kept its "sovereignty, freedom, and independence." under atil New York, Connecticut, and Virginia ticles of set of r Articles is power that cannot be misused. se A The national government's inability to make state governments and their citizens live up to treaties it had made led to a serious situation. Not all of the colonists had been in favor of the Revolutionary War, some had remained loyal to Great Britain. Thousands of these people, called loyalists, still lived in the United States When the war was over, the national government signed a peace treaty with Great Britain called the Treaty of Paris. It was intended in part to protect loyalists' rights and ensure that they were treated fairly. Some of these loyalists owned property in the states and some had loaned money to other citizens. ult described below. . No money and no power to get it. Congress had no emments pay certain amounts to support the costs of the national government. fthe money it needed to pay for the Revolutionary War fom Americans and foreigners, but had no way to pay is debts. The state governments and many of the people iving in the states were also deeply in debt after the war. Therefore, when Congress requested $10 million from he states to pay for the costs of fighting the war, the sates paid only $1.5 million. Some state governments refused to respect this treaty. They often made it difficult for loyalists to collect the money owed to them by other citizens. In some cases the states had confiscated the loyalists' property during the war. The national government had no power to force the state governments to respect the property rights of the loyalists or to force individual citizens to pay back money owed to the loyalists. Thus, the national government was powerless to live up to its promise to the British government to protect the rights of these citizens. CONGRESS 3. Unenforceable trade agreements. Although Congress had the power to make agreements with foreign nations, it did not have the power to make state governments live up to these agreements. This raised another difficulty. Some citizens imported goods from other nations and then refused to pay for them. Not surprisingly, people in foreign countries became reluctant to trade with people in the United States. In addition, when Great Britain recognized how weak Congress was in controlling foreign trade, it closed the West Indies to American commerce. As a result, many Americans lost money because they were unable to sell their goods to people in other nations. Others were not able to buy goods from abroad. STATES GIVE 4. Unfair competition among the states. Congress had no power to make laws regulating trade among the states. As a result, some states levied taxes on goods passing through them to other states. For example, both New York and Pennsylvania taxed goods going to New Jersey which was compared to “a keg tapped at both ends." was Congress's ability to govern hurt by not beng able to collect taxes from the states?
Expert Solution
Step 1

# Foreign swap of the United States embodies the international imports and exports of the country itself. The country has exchange connections with many other nations. The 1920s marked a decade of financial expansion in the United States. The U.S. commonly has evolved softer salvation rates than its trading collaborators which have verged to have labor excess. U.s. fundamental economic interests directed on-

  • High economic detriment,
  • Huge non-bank corporate debt,
  • High unfunded medicare weakness,
  • Social defense debt,
  • High extern deficit,
  • The severe reversal in the worldwide venture. 
  • Extended trade deficit etc.
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer