Leonard, a company that manufactures explosion-proof motors, is considering two alternatives for expanding its international export capacity. Option 1 requires equipment purchases of $875000 now and $575000 two years from now, with annual M&O costs of $82000 in years 1 through 10. Option 2 involves subcontracting some of the production at costs of $270000 per year beginning now through the end of year 10. Neither option will have a significant salvage value. Use a present worth analysis to determine which option is more attractive at the company's MARR of 12.00% per year. (Include a minus sign if necessary.) The present worth of option 1 is $ -1796704 and that of option 2 is $ Option 2 is more attractive.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
Leonard, a company that manufactures explosion-proof motors, is considering two alternatives for expanding its international export
capacity. Option 1 requires equipment purchases of $875000 now and $575000 two years from now, with annual M&O costs
of $82000 in years 1 through 10. Option 2 involves subcontracting some of the production at costs of $270000 per year beginning
now through the end of year 10. Neither option will have a significant salvage value. Use a present worth analysis to determine which
option is more attractive at the company's MARR of 12.00% per year. (Include a minus sign if necessary.)
The present worth of option 1 is $ -1796704 and that of option 2 is $
Option 2
is more attractive.
Transcribed Image Text:Leonard, a company that manufactures explosion-proof motors, is considering two alternatives for expanding its international export capacity. Option 1 requires equipment purchases of $875000 now and $575000 two years from now, with annual M&O costs of $82000 in years 1 through 10. Option 2 involves subcontracting some of the production at costs of $270000 per year beginning now through the end of year 10. Neither option will have a significant salvage value. Use a present worth analysis to determine which option is more attractive at the company's MARR of 12.00% per year. (Include a minus sign if necessary.) The present worth of option 1 is $ -1796704 and that of option 2 is $ Option 2 is more attractive.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education