In your opinion is it correct to claim that the Zulu state caused the Mfecane? Quote a line from source A to prove your statement. Can Source 1A be considered a useful source to a historian studying this period of history?
In your opinion is it correct to claim that the Zulu state caused the Mfecane? Quote a line from source A to prove your statement. Can Source 1A be considered a useful source to a historian studying this period of history?
Related questions
Question
![SOURCE 1A:
This source explains the different interpretations about the start of the Mfecane.
Earlier historical explanations of change emphasised the military talents of ambitious
rulers like Dingiswayo, Sobhuza, Zwide and Shaka. Within this perspective Shaka, the
leader of a small chiefdom under the Mthethwa, rose to prominence through fighting
and diplomacy; he is seen as the cause of the Mfecane. This version of events claims
that, between 1818 and 1828, Shaka conquered most of present day Kwazulu-Natal.
He is credited with defeating the Ndwandwe and driving them north to the Pongola
river. After this, Shaka began to conquer and incorporate most of the Nguni people
between the Thukela river and Delagoa Bay. Between 1818 and 1828, shaka bolt a
powerful, centralized and militaristic Kingdom.
Some historians believe that the emergence of the Zulu state did not start the process
of the political transformation known as the Mfecane, but was itself a product of a
chain of events which had started earlier. It is these earlier processes that have given
rise to states such as the Ndwandwe and the Mthethwa... These historians say that the
role of the Zulu state in the Mfecane has been exaggerated.
[From: Oxford In search of History grade 10, 113.]](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F42435478-0e0b-47b5-96b0-e83067b5e654%2F272aca4f-de76-48ec-ba93-7ad6333a2db6%2F8gx242e_processed.png&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:SOURCE 1A:
This source explains the different interpretations about the start of the Mfecane.
Earlier historical explanations of change emphasised the military talents of ambitious
rulers like Dingiswayo, Sobhuza, Zwide and Shaka. Within this perspective Shaka, the
leader of a small chiefdom under the Mthethwa, rose to prominence through fighting
and diplomacy; he is seen as the cause of the Mfecane. This version of events claims
that, between 1818 and 1828, Shaka conquered most of present day Kwazulu-Natal.
He is credited with defeating the Ndwandwe and driving them north to the Pongola
river. After this, Shaka began to conquer and incorporate most of the Nguni people
between the Thukela river and Delagoa Bay. Between 1818 and 1828, shaka bolt a
powerful, centralized and militaristic Kingdom.
Some historians believe that the emergence of the Zulu state did not start the process
of the political transformation known as the Mfecane, but was itself a product of a
chain of events which had started earlier. It is these earlier processes that have given
rise to states such as the Ndwandwe and the Mthethwa... These historians say that the
role of the Zulu state in the Mfecane has been exaggerated.
[From: Oxford In search of History grade 10, 113.]
Transcribed Image Text:1.1.4 In your opinion is it correct to claim that the Zulu state
caused the Mfecane? Quote a line from source A to prove
your statement.
1.1.5
Can Source 1A be considered a useful source to a historian
studying this period of history?
Expert Solution
Step 1
Mfecane in the Zulu language means to crush, scattering, forced dispersal and forced migration. The term emerged in the late 18th century Zulu kingdom, waging genocidal wars led by Shaka Zulu to expand his territories and depopulation the area. The action caused the fleeing of people and resulted in violence and the death of millions.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
