Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Social Science
History
Below is an argument for the expansion of suffrage and against. Read the following primary source documents and answer their corresponding questions. In 1821, New York State held a convention to revise the state constitution. A committee recommended dropping the requirement that voters be property owners. This would allow all white male adults the right to vote. The following excerpt shows how Nathan Sanford, the chairman of the committee, felt about the recommendation. The question before us is the right of suffrage - who shall or who shall not have the right to vote... To me the only qualifications [to vote] seem to be the virtue and morality of the people... those who contribute to the public support we consider as entitled to a share of the election of rulers... Now, sir, this scheme will embrace almost the whole male population of the state... This scheme has been proposed by a majority of the committee; they think it safe and beneficial founded on just and moral principles. Reports of the Proceedings and Debates of the Convention of 1821, Assembled for the purpose of Amending the Constitution of the State of New York, Albany, New York, 1821) 4. Where and when does this passage come from? 5. Was Nathan Sanford for or against expanding the right to vote to common men? 6. What was his argument? 7. Does Sanford look upon the people as in a positive light or negative light? Ⓒ2020 All Rights Reserved.

Below is an argument for the expansion of suffrage and against. Read the following primary source documents and answer their corresponding questions. In 1821, New York State held a convention to revise the state constitution. A committee recommended dropping the requirement that voters be property owners. This would allow all white male adults the right to vote. The following excerpt shows how Nathan Sanford, the chairman of the committee, felt about the recommendation. The question before us is the right of suffrage - who shall or who shall not have the right to vote... To me the only qualifications [to vote] seem to be the virtue and morality of the people... those who contribute to the public support we consider as entitled to a share of the election of rulers... Now, sir, this scheme will embrace almost the whole male population of the state... This scheme has been proposed by a majority of the committee; they think it safe and beneficial founded on just and moral principles. Reports of the Proceedings and Debates of the Convention of 1821, Assembled for the purpose of Amending the Constitution of the State of New York, Albany, New York, 1821) 4. Where and when does this passage come from? 5. Was Nathan Sanford for or against expanding the right to vote to common men? 6. What was his argument? 7. Does Sanford look upon the people as in a positive light or negative light? Ⓒ2020 All Rights Reserved.

icon
Related questions
Question
Please send me the question only 6-7 in 20 minutes it's very urgent plz
ERA OF THE COMMON M 1824 to 1840 AN The Suffrage Debate The years from about 1824 to 1840 have been called the the "Era of the Common Man" or the "Age of Jacksonian Democracy." During this period, white men who did not own land gained the right to vote, and therefore had more political power. It is important to note that the United States was far from democratic however. Women could not vote and were legally under the control of their husbands. Free blacks were considered second-class citizens at best, and slavery was growing in the southern states. Native Americans were forced from their homes west of the Mississippi River and had little to no political power. By today's standards, suffrage or the right to vote, should not have been an argument. But it was. Each state in the U.S. debated whether to give non landowning white men the right to vote. Answer the following questions: 1. Why were the years 1824 to 1840 called the Era of the Common Man? 2. What is suffrage?. 3. Why have critics said that this period was far from "common" or democratic? Below is an argument for the expansion of suffrage and against. Read the following primary source documents and answer their corresponding questions. In 1821, New York State held a convention to revise the state constitution. A committee recommended dropping the requirement that voters be property owners. This would allow all white male adults the right to vote. The following excerpt shows how Nathan Sanford, the chairman of the committee, felt about the recommendation. The question before us is the right of suffrage - who shall or who shall not have the right to vote... To me the only qualifications [to vote] seem to be the virtue and morality of the people... those who contribute to the public support we consider as entitled to a share of the election of rulers... Now, sir, this scheme will embrace almost the whole male population of the state... This scheme has been proposed by a majority of the committee; they think it safe and beneficial founded on just and moral principles. Reports of the Proceedings and Debates of the Convention of 1821, Assembled for the Purpose of Amending the Constitution of the State of New York, Albany, New York, 1821) 4. Where and when does this passage come from? 5. Was Nathan Sanford for or against expanding the right to vote to common men? 6. What was his argument? 7. Does Sanford look upon the people as in a positive light or negative light? Ⓒ2020 All Rights Reserved.
Transcribed Image Text:ERA OF THE COMMON M 1824 to 1840 AN The Suffrage Debate The years from about 1824 to 1840 have been called the the "Era of the Common Man" or the "Age of Jacksonian Democracy." During this period, white men who did not own land gained the right to vote, and therefore had more political power. It is important to note that the United States was far from democratic however. Women could not vote and were legally under the control of their husbands. Free blacks were considered second-class citizens at best, and slavery was growing in the southern states. Native Americans were forced from their homes west of the Mississippi River and had little to no political power. By today's standards, suffrage or the right to vote, should not have been an argument. But it was. Each state in the U.S. debated whether to give non landowning white men the right to vote. Answer the following questions: 1. Why were the years 1824 to 1840 called the Era of the Common Man? 2. What is suffrage?. 3. Why have critics said that this period was far from "common" or democratic? Below is an argument for the expansion of suffrage and against. Read the following primary source documents and answer their corresponding questions. In 1821, New York State held a convention to revise the state constitution. A committee recommended dropping the requirement that voters be property owners. This would allow all white male adults the right to vote. The following excerpt shows how Nathan Sanford, the chairman of the committee, felt about the recommendation. The question before us is the right of suffrage - who shall or who shall not have the right to vote... To me the only qualifications [to vote] seem to be the virtue and morality of the people... those who contribute to the public support we consider as entitled to a share of the election of rulers... Now, sir, this scheme will embrace almost the whole male population of the state... This scheme has been proposed by a majority of the committee; they think it safe and beneficial founded on just and moral principles. Reports of the Proceedings and Debates of the Convention of 1821, Assembled for the Purpose of Amending the Constitution of the State of New York, Albany, New York, 1821) 4. Where and when does this passage come from? 5. Was Nathan Sanford for or against expanding the right to vote to common men? 6. What was his argument? 7. Does Sanford look upon the people as in a positive light or negative light? Ⓒ2020 All Rights Reserved.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer