In a random sample of 660 full-time workers, 132 indicated that they were so angered by a coworker during the past year that they felt like hitting the coworker (but didn’t). Compute and interpret a 99% confidence interval for the true proportion of workers so angered in the last year that they wanted to hit a colleague. (round final answer to 2 decimal places) (lower boundary _____________, upper boundary ____________) Circle which will happen to the confidence interval above if we were to increase the sample size of the study.(answer simply with the number, 1 or 2, based on the two choices below) 1 - CI will become less precise, that is wider. 2 - CI will become more precise.
In a random sample of 660 full-time workers, 132 indicated that they were so angered by a coworker during the past year that they felt like hitting the coworker (but didn’t).
Compute and interpret a 99% confidence interval for the true proportion of workers so angered in the last year that they wanted to hit a colleague. (round final answer to 2 decimal places)
(lower boundary _____________, upper boundary ____________)
Circle which will happen to the confidence interval above if we were to increase the
1 - CI will become less precise, that is wider.
2 - CI will become more precise.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 2 images