How does logging in a tropical rain forest affect the forest in later years? Researchers compared forest plots in Borneo that had never been logged (Group 11 ) with similar plots that had been logged one year earlier (Group 22 ), and eight years earlier (Group 33 ). Although the study was not an experiment, the authors explained why we can consider the plots to be randomly selected. The data appear in the table. The variable Trees is the count of trees in a plot; Species is the count of tree species in a plot. The variable Richness is the number of species divided by the number of individual trees. Data from a study of logging in Borneo (Picture Attached) To access the complete data set, click the link for your preferred software format: Excel Minitab JMP SPSS TI R Mac-TXT PC-TXT CSV CrunchIt! It was found that there is strong evidence that logging is related to differences in the mean number of species. It was also found that it would be risky to use ANOVA to analyze richness, since conditions were not met. Use software to analyze to effect of logging on the number of trees. (a) Make a table of the group means and standard deviations for the variable Trees. Do the standard deviations satisfy our rule of thumb for safe use of ANOVA? What do the means suggest about the effect of logging on the number of trees? The ratio of the largest and smallest standard deviation is more than 22 , so the condition is not satisfied. The means suggest that logging reduces the number of trees. The ratio of the largest and smallest standard deviation is less than 22 , so the condition is satisfied. The means suggest that logging increases the number of trees. The ratio of the largest and smallest standard deviation is less than 22 , so the condition is satisfied. The means suggest that logging reduces the number of trees. The ratio of the largest and smallest standard deviation is more than 22 , so the condition is satisfied. The means suggest that logging increases the number of trees. (b) Carry out the ANOVA. Report the ?F statistic and its ?P ‑value. (Enter your answer for ?F rounded to two decimal places. Enter your answer for the ?P ‑value rounded to four decimal places.) ?:F: ?:P: Select the best conclusion. The test results are irrelevant, since the conditions were not met. There is strong evidence that the mean number of trees is not the same for the three groups. There is strong evidence that the mean number of trees is smaller for plots that have been more recently logged. There is strong evidence that the mean number of trees is the same for the three groups.
How does logging in a tropical rain forest affect the forest in later years? Researchers compared forest plots in Borneo that had never been logged (Group 11 ) with similar plots that had been logged one year earlier (Group 22 ), and eight years earlier (Group 33 ). Although the study was not an experiment, the authors explained why we can consider the plots to be randomly selected. The data appear in the table. The variable Trees is the count of trees in a plot; Species is the count of tree species in a plot. The variable Richness is the number of species divided by the number of individual trees.
Data from a study of logging in BorneoTo access the complete data set, click the link for your preferred software format:
Excel Minitab JMP SPSS TI R Mac-TXT PC-TXT CSV CrunchIt!
It was found that there is strong evidence that logging is related to differences in the
(a) Make a table of the group means and standard deviations for the variable Trees.
(b) Carry out the ANOVA. Report the ?F statistic and its ?P ‑value.
(Enter your answer for ?F rounded to two decimal places. Enter your answer for the ?P ‑value rounded to four decimal places.)
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 4 images