Here are hypothetical data for Germany and Japan on average labor productivity, the number of persons employed, and population in a given year Average labor productivity $88,204 |$44,216 Number of persons employed 32.36 million 50.48 million than that of Germany by approximately Population 78.17 million 104.3 million Germany Japan Japan's real GDP per person is O lower; $15,114 O higher; $121,711 O lower; $121,711 O higher, $15,114

Here are hypothetical data for Germany and Japan on average labor productivity, the number of persons employed, and population in a given year Average labor productivity $88,204 |$44,216 Number of persons employed 32.36 million 50.48 million than that of Germany by approximately Population 78.17 million 104.3 million Germany Japan Japan's real GDP per person is O lower; $15,114 O higher; $121,711 O lower; $121,711 O higher, $15,114

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter19: The Macroeconomic Perspective

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 32P: In 1980, Denmark had a GDP of 70 billion (measured in U.S. dollars} and a population of 5.1 million....

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In 1980, Denmark had a GDP of 70 billion (measured in U.S. dollars} and a population of 5.1 million. In 2000, Denmark had 3 GDP of 160 billion (measured in U.S. dollars} and a population of 5.3 million. By what percentage did Denmarks GDP per capita rise between 1980 and 2000?
The following table shows the GDP per capita of various countries forthe years 1960 and 2010 in PPP-adjusted 2005 dollars. The table alsocontains the implied growth rates, which show how much on average eachcountry needed to grow each year to reach the 2010 level of GDP per capitastarting from the 1960 level of GDP per capita. Use the table to answer thefollowing questions. 1. During 1960-2010, which countries failed to reduce the gap betweentheir GDP per capita and the U.S. GDP per capita?
The following table shows the GDP per capita of various countries forthe years 1960 and 2010 in PPP-adjusted 2005 dollars. The table alsocontains the implied growth rates, which show how much on average eachcountry needed to grow each year to reach the 2010 level of GDP per capitastarting from the 1960 level of GDP per capita. Use the table to answer thefollowing questions. 1. Why have some countries reduced the gap between their incomes andthat of the United States and other countries failed to do so?
The following table shows the GDP per capita of various countries forthe years 1960 and 2010 in PPP-adjusted 2005 dollars. The table alsocontains the implied growth rates, which show how much on average eachcountry needed to grow each year to reach the 2010 level of GDP per capitastarting from the 1960 level of GDP per capita. Use the table to answer thefollowing questions. 1. During 1960-2010, which countries were able to reduce the gap betweentheir GDP per capita and the U.S. GDP per capita?
Year 1960 1980 Argentinal 2018 $5,643 Percentage of Real GDP per 1960 2018 capita real real (2010 GDP GDP dollars) per per capita capita 7,908 ? 2000 8,224 ? The accompanying table shows data from the World Bank, World Development Indicators, for real GDP per capita in 2010 U.S. dollars for Argentina, Ghana, South Korea, and the United States for 1960, 1980, 2000, and 2018. 10,044 ? ? ? ? C Ghana Real GDP per 1960 capita real (2010 GDP dollars) per Percentage of 881 $1,056 ? 952 capita ? ? 1,807 ? 2018 real GDP per capita ? ? ? 2. South Korea Real GDP per capita (2010 dollars) $944 Percentage of 15,105 1960 real GDP per capita ? 3,700 ? ? 26,762 ? 2018 real GDP per capita ? ? ? ?
Typed plaza Asap
What were the sources of labor productivity growth in the U.S. economy during the sixty years since 1960? How did the 1960s differ from the more recent decades? During the sixty years since 1960, the sources of labor productivity growth include O A. plastics, the laser, and the computer during the 1960s, and the Internet during later years O B. the focus on saving energy during the 1970s O C. the wide-spread introduction of the Internet during the 1970s O D. the global financial turmoil of 2008-2009 that made labor more productive Comparing the 1960s to the more recent decades, labor productivity growth than in subsequent decades. O A. in the 1960s was approximately 25 percent higher O B. in the 1960s was smaller C. due to technological change was smaller in the 1960s O D. due to physical capital and human capital growth was greater in the 1960s Click to select your answer. MacBook A
Between 1970 and 2005, Chinaâ€™s GDP per capita grew at an average rate of 7.3% per year while GDP per capita in the US grew at an average rate of 2.2%. In 2005, US GDP per capita was $36,806 and Chinese GDP per capita was $5,955. Assuming that the two countries continue to grow at these rates, in what year will China overtake the US in terms of GDP per capita?
C I G NX Price Yr1 1000 156 560 52 4 Yr2 1300 159 600 52 5 Yr3 2000 169 690 53 6 Yr4 2900 180 880 53 7 Population Yr1 2 Yr2 2 Yr3 3 Yr4 3 Using the information above: State what real GDP per capita will be for all four years. (round to the whole number for all calculations and final answers) State what the change in real GDP per capita will be from year 1 to…
ASAP plzzz
Which impacts economic growth? O a decrease in the productivity of labor O an increase in the proportion of the population that is college educated O an increase in the average wage rate paid to workers O an increase in the standard of living
Say that the average worker in the U.S. economy is eight times as productive as an average worker in Mexico. If the productivity of U.S. workers grows at 2 for 25 years and the productivity of Mexicos workers grows at 6 for 25 years, which country will have higher worker productivity at that point?