Harry appointed Ogie to sell his car worth P500,000. Ogie sold the car to Pinky for P550,000 but acted in his own name. After delivery, Pinky inspected the car and she found hidden defects in the car. Is Harry liable to Pinky even if Ogie acted in his own name? a. No, because Pinky is presumed to have inspected the car. b. Yes, because this is a contract involving property belonging to the principal. c. No, because the contract of sale is between Ogie and Pinky. d. Yes, if Harry is in bad faith.
Harry appointed Ogie to sell his car worth P500,000. Ogie sold the car to Pinky for P550,000 but acted in his own name. After delivery, Pinky inspected the car and she found hidden defects in the car. Is Harry liable to Pinky even if Ogie acted in his own name? a. No, because Pinky is presumed to have inspected the car. b. Yes, because this is a contract involving property belonging to the principal. c. No, because the contract of sale is between Ogie and Pinky. d. Yes, if Harry is in bad faith.
Related questions
Question
Harry appointed Ogie to sell his car worth P500,000. Ogie sold the car to Pinky for P550,000 but acted in his own name. After delivery, Pinky inspected the car and she found hidden defects in the car. Is Harry liable to Pinky even if Ogie acted in his own name?
a. No, because Pinky is presumed to have inspected the car.
b. Yes, because this is a contract involving property belonging to the principal.
c. No, because the contract of sale is between Ogie and Pinky.
d. Yes, if Harry is in bad faith.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
