Sue was shopping at the dover mall. as she was walking to dicks sporting goods store, her watch fell off of her wrist. while trying on shoes, sue left her leather jacket in the store department. amy sfound sues watch. steve, a sales associate found her jacket. what kind of found property is sues watch? What kind of property is her jacket? What rights- if any- do amy and steve have regarding the property?

Sue was shopping at the dover mall. as she was walking to dicks sporting goods store, her watch fell off of her wrist. while trying on shoes, sue left her leather jacket in the store department. amy sfound sues watch. steve, a sales associate found her jacket. what kind of found property is sues watch? What kind of property is her jacket? What rights- if any- do amy and steve have regarding the property?

Similar questions

A man named Bob Smith believes that he is Santa Claus (who delivers presents to all the children around the world on Christmas Eve). In fact, he is not Santa, but he has believed this for many years. He signs his name "Santa." He signs many contracts as "Santa," and he refers to his wife as "Mrs. Claus" even though her name is actually Betty Smith. She puts up with it, because he really does believe he is Santa, and because she loves him and because his wages from his job at Hasbro toys pays the bills. One day he enters a contract with your company to hire you to build him a gigantic workshop in his backyard so he can build his toys and stable his "eight tiny reindeer." In return he will pay you $120,000 for the construction. When his wife learns of this deal, she tries to reject it because it is voidable due to his lack of contractual capacity. Was this contract voidable, or valid and enforceable? Answer the questions.
Ann took Bonnie’s watch before Bonnie was aware of the theft. Bonnie discovered her loss immediately and pursued Ann. Ann pointed a loaded pistol at Bonnie, who, in fear of being shot, allowed Ann to escape. Was Ann guilty of robbery? Of any other crime?
An intruder entered through a window and raped McCutchen in her apartment. MCutchen sued the landlord, Ten Associates, for failure to provide adequate security and failure to warn her of the risk of intrusion through the window. Ten Associates claimed that they had no way of anticipating an intruder. Evidence was introduced that revealed the landlord knew or should have known of a prior rape and numerous intrusions through apartment windows. Does it appear that Ten Associates was negligent in providing for the security of tenants?
Ramona Smith spilled orange juice on her computer two days before her term paper was due. Ramona desperately needed a new laptop, so she went online and found a laptop that fit her needs. She emailed the seller, Effie Frost, expressing her desire to purchase the laptop. Effie ernailed Ramona back and said that she (Effie) would sell Effie's laptop to Ramona for $300. An hour later, Ramona and Effie signed the following agreement: "1, Effie Frost, agree to sell my laptop computer to Ramona Smith for Four Hundred Dollars and zero cents. This is the entirety of the agreement. This agreement supersedes any and all other agreements made by the seller and the buyer." Ramona now claims that she should only pay $300 for the laptop because during that initial email exchange with Effie, Effie told Ramona that $300 was the price of the laptop, and she has the email exchange as evidence of the price quote of $300. What legal concept could be used to enforce the contract for $400? O Condition…
Using the IRAC model to answer the question. Jim and Jane got married last Sunday. The next day they travelled to Extended Stay Hotel in Miami for their honeymoon. They arrived at the Hotel, checked in and proceeded to their room. At the back of the front door in their room was a notice excluding liability, which read that “ Extended Stay will not be responsible for articles lost or stolen, unless it is logged at the front desk for safe custody.” However, this exclusion clause could only be seen after the door is closed as well as, the actual notice was small and colored in black, with a white background. Regrettably, with all the excitement of their honeymoon, both Jim and Jane did not even notice the exclusion clause at the back of the door. One day when they were out shopping, someone came into their room and stole Jim’s laptop.…
Joseph Eugene Dodson, age sixteen, purchased a used pickup truck from Burns and Mary Shrader. The Shraders owned and operated Shrader’s Auto Sales. Dodson paid $14,900 in cash for the truck. At the time of sale, the Shraders did not question Dodson’s age, but thought he was eighteen or nineteen. Dodson made no misrepresentation concerning his age. Nine months after the date of purchase, the truck began to develop mechanical problems. A mechanic diagnosed the problem as a burnt valve but could not be certain. Dodson, who could not afford the repairs, continued to drive the truck until one month later, when the engine “blew up.” Dodson parked the vehicle in the front yard of his parents’ home and contacted the Shraders to rescind the purchase of the truck and to request a full refund. a. What arguments would support Dodson’s termination of the contract? b. What arguments would support Shrader’s position that the contract is not voidable? c. Which side should prevail? Explain.
Michael built a calculator (which graphs) using plans Michael found posted on the internet, but he unreasonably didn’t follow the plans when he constructed the calculator. Michael then sold the calculator to Jack who was injured when the calculator exploded because it hadn’t been built according to the plans. After the explosion Jack was taken to the Hospital emergency room (“ER”) where he signed a consent form authorizing Dr. Joe, the ER doctor, to perform a surgical procedure called Surgery X. But, instead Dr. Joe performed Surgery Y, a different procedure than Surgery X. A. What cause(s) of action should Jack use if he sues Michael for Jack’s injuries. Discuss. B. Has Joe, the ER doctor, committed any intentional torts? If so, discuss.
What is the difference between possession and title of personal property?
In the case, the Supreme Court held the content of Westboro's signs related to private matters. True False
Ma3. Explain in brief. Sally Henderson is an employee of Good Eats Restaurant. Sally's contract with Good Eats Restaurant states: "Sally Henderson shall ensure the bathrooms and dining room area are reasonably clean during operating hours." Sally's good friend James is also employed by Good Eats Restaurant as a parking attendant, a person who parks customers’ cars. On a very busy night at Good Eats Restaurant, without the authorization of Good Eats Restaurant, Sally decided to help her friend James park cars. Sally injures a customer due to Sally's negligent driving while parking cars. The injured customer sues Sally and Good Eats Restaurant. Is it likely that Good Eats Restaurant will be determined to be liable to the injured customer. BRIEFLY EXPLAIN.
Alan rents a flat in a block of units in the eastern suburbs of Sydney. One summer evening, during a balcony BBQ, Alan tosses several empty beer cans onto the adjoining balcony of the flat rented by Jimmy. What redress in law, if any, does Jimmy have?
Bob went out with his friends to celebrate his birthday. They went to a bar where they drank copious quantities of alcohol. In the morning, Bob had not slept and was still obviously intoxicated. He found his way to a car dealership near his house and entered into a contract to buy a Mercedes Benz SUV for the cost of $140,000.00. The car salesman could smell alcohol on Bob's breath, he noticed his eyes were bloodshot and "glossy" while they were signing the papers relating to the sale, and when Bob left he could see that he was unsteady on his feet. Bob left the dealership and went home and went to bed. He slept for two days. The car salesman from the dealership called Bob 4 days later to tell him that his vehicle was ready for pick up. Bob had no memory of the buying any car. In these circumstances:A. the contract is void ab initio because Bob lacked capacity to contract due to his intoxicationB. Bob can avoid or repudiate the contract within a reasonable time after he regains capacity…