For Tukey’s HSD, how would you report your results? (groups: 1= 5-25 years, 2 = 26-59 years, 3 = 60-92 years) Group of answer choices: 1. A Tukey’s post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ score for younger subjects (112.40) was significantly different than the mean FIQ scores for middle-age subjects (107.15) and older subjects (108.40). 2. A Tukey’s post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ score for younger subjects (112.40) was significantly higher than the mean FIQ scores for middle-age subjects (107.15) and older subjects (108.40). 3. A Tukey’s post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ score for younger subjects (109.08) was significantly lower than the mean FIQ score for middle-age subjects (112.40) but significantly higher than the mean FIQ score for older subjects (107.15). 4. A Tukey’s post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ scores for younger subjects (108.40) and older subjects (109.08) were not different, but both were significantly higher than the mean FIQ score for middle-age subjects (107.15). 5. A Tukey’s post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ scores for younger subjects (107.15) and middle-age subjects (108.40) were not different from one another, but both were significantly lower than the mean FIQ score for older subjects (112.40). 6. None of the above

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

For Tukey’s HSD, how would you report your results? (groups: 1= 5-25 years, 2 = 26-59 years, 3 = 60-92 years)

Group of answer choices:

1. A Tukey’s post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ score for younger subjects (112.40) was significantly different than the mean FIQ scores for middle-age subjects (107.15) and older subjects (108.40).

2. A Tukey’s post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ score for younger subjects (112.40) was significantly higher than the mean FIQ scores for middle-age subjects (107.15) and older subjects (108.40).

3. A Tukey’s post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ score for younger subjects (109.08) was significantly lower than the mean FIQ score for middle-age subjects (112.40) but significantly higher than the mean FIQ score for older subjects (107.15).

4. A Tukey’s post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ scores for younger subjects (108.40) and older subjects (109.08) were not different, but both were significantly higher than the mean FIQ score for middle-age subjects (107.15).

5. A Tukey’s post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ scores for younger subjects (107.15) and middle-age subjects (108.40) were not different from one another, but both were significantly lower than the mean FIQ score for older subjects (112.40).

6. None of the above