For instance, after the company's recruiters interview graduating seniors on college campuses and identify possible hires, they give the applicants a standardized intelligence test. Those who fail to score at least in the 80th percentile are eliminated from the applicant pool. Alix thinks that if intelligence tests are used by billion-dollar corporations to screen job applicants, why shouldn't colleges use them? Moreover, since one of the objectives of a college should be to get its graduates placed in good jobs, maybe SAT scores should be given even higher weight than 40 percent in the selection decision. After all, if SAT taps intelligence and employers want intelligent job applicants, why not make college selection decisions predominantly on the basis of SAT scores? Or should her college replace the SAT with a pure intelligence test such as the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale? Sources: Stephen P. Robbins, (2020). Organisational Behavior (9th Edition) Prentice Hall. Question 1 Apart from relying on SATS measures, explain any other variables that Alix should consider that could influence individual behaviour.

Understanding Business
12th Edition
ISBN:9781259929434
Author:William Nickels
Publisher:William Nickels
Chapter1: Taking Risks And Making Profits Within The Dynamic Business Environment
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1CE
icon
Related questions
Question

Please do not give solution in image format thanku

Predicting Performance
Alix Maher is the new admissions director at a small highly selective New England
college. She has a bachelor's degree in education and a recent master's degree in
educational administration. But she has no prior experience in college admissions.
Alix's predecessor, in conjunction with the college's admissions committee (made up
of five faculty members), had given the following weights to student selection criteria:
high school grades (40 percent), scholastic aptitude test (SAT) scores (40 percent);
extracurricular activities and achievements (10 percent); and the quality and
creativity of a written theme submitted with the application (10 percent).
Alix has serious reservations about using SAT scores. In their defense, she
recognises that the quality of high schools varies greatly, so that the level of student
performance that receives an A in American history at one school might earn only a
C at a far more demanding school. Alix is also aware that the people who design the
SATS, the Educational Testing Service, argue forcefully that these test scores are
valid predictors of how well a person will do in college. Yet Alix has several
concerns:
1. The pressure of the SAT exam is very great, and many students suffer from test
anxiety. The results, therefore, may not truly reflect what a student knows.
2. There is evidence that coaching improves scores by between 40 and 150 points.
Test scores, therefore, may adversely affect the chances of acceptance for
students who cannot afford the $600 or $700 to take test-coaching courses.
3. Are SATS valid, or do they discriminate against minorities, the poor, and those
who have had limited to access to cultural growth experiences?
As Alix ponders whether she wants to recommend changing the college's selection
criteria and weights, she is reminded of a recent conversation she had with a friend
who is an industrial psychologist with a Fortune 100 company. He told her that his
company regularly uses intelligence tests to help select from among job applicants.
Transcribed Image Text:Predicting Performance Alix Maher is the new admissions director at a small highly selective New England college. She has a bachelor's degree in education and a recent master's degree in educational administration. But she has no prior experience in college admissions. Alix's predecessor, in conjunction with the college's admissions committee (made up of five faculty members), had given the following weights to student selection criteria: high school grades (40 percent), scholastic aptitude test (SAT) scores (40 percent); extracurricular activities and achievements (10 percent); and the quality and creativity of a written theme submitted with the application (10 percent). Alix has serious reservations about using SAT scores. In their defense, she recognises that the quality of high schools varies greatly, so that the level of student performance that receives an A in American history at one school might earn only a C at a far more demanding school. Alix is also aware that the people who design the SATS, the Educational Testing Service, argue forcefully that these test scores are valid predictors of how well a person will do in college. Yet Alix has several concerns: 1. The pressure of the SAT exam is very great, and many students suffer from test anxiety. The results, therefore, may not truly reflect what a student knows. 2. There is evidence that coaching improves scores by between 40 and 150 points. Test scores, therefore, may adversely affect the chances of acceptance for students who cannot afford the $600 or $700 to take test-coaching courses. 3. Are SATS valid, or do they discriminate against minorities, the poor, and those who have had limited to access to cultural growth experiences? As Alix ponders whether she wants to recommend changing the college's selection criteria and weights, she is reminded of a recent conversation she had with a friend who is an industrial psychologist with a Fortune 100 company. He told her that his company regularly uses intelligence tests to help select from among job applicants.
For instance, after the company's recruiters interview graduating seniors on college
campuses and identify possible hires, they give the applicants a standardized
intelligence test. Those who fail to score at least in the 80th percentile are eliminated
from the applicant pool.
Alix thinks that if intelligence tests are used by billion-dollar corporations to screen
job applicants, why shouldn't colleges use them? Moreover, since one of the
objectives of a college should be to get its graduates placed in good jobs, maybe
SAT scores should be given even higher weight than 40 percent in the selection
decision. After all, if SAT taps intelligence and employers want intelligent job
applicants, why not make college selection decisions predominantly on the basis of
SAT scores? Or should her college replace the SAT with a pure intelligence test
such as the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale?
Sources: Stephen P. Robbins, (2020). Organisational Behavior (9th Edition) Prentice
Hall.
Question 1
Apart from relying on SATS measures, explain any other variables that Alix should
consider that could influence individual behaviour.
Transcribed Image Text:For instance, after the company's recruiters interview graduating seniors on college campuses and identify possible hires, they give the applicants a standardized intelligence test. Those who fail to score at least in the 80th percentile are eliminated from the applicant pool. Alix thinks that if intelligence tests are used by billion-dollar corporations to screen job applicants, why shouldn't colleges use them? Moreover, since one of the objectives of a college should be to get its graduates placed in good jobs, maybe SAT scores should be given even higher weight than 40 percent in the selection decision. After all, if SAT taps intelligence and employers want intelligent job applicants, why not make college selection decisions predominantly on the basis of SAT scores? Or should her college replace the SAT with a pure intelligence test such as the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale? Sources: Stephen P. Robbins, (2020). Organisational Behavior (9th Edition) Prentice Hall. Question 1 Apart from relying on SATS measures, explain any other variables that Alix should consider that could influence individual behaviour.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Understanding Business
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:
9781259929434
Author:
William Nickels
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:
9780134527604
Author:
Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:
PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract…
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract…
Management
ISBN:
9781305947412
Author:
Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi…
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi…
Management
ISBN:
9780135191798
Author:
Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:
PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in…
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in…
Management
ISBN:
9780134728391
Author:
Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:
PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:
9780134237473
Author:
Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:
PEARSON