Firm-1 is the incumbent monopolist and firm-2 is the potential entrant into the market. Firm-2 moves first and chooses to "enter" or "not enter". If it does "not enter", then firm-1 gets 10 while firm-2 gets 0. If firm-2 "enters", then firm-1 chooses either to "fight" or "not fight". If firm-1 "fights", then firm-1 gets 6 while firm-2 gets -2. If firm-1 does "not fight", then firm-1 gets 8 and firm-2 gets 2. Firm-1's strategy of "fight" is best interpreted as (a) acquiescence (b) a punitive action (c) a commitment (d) a non-credible threat

Firm-1 is the incumbent monopolist and firm-2 is the potential entrant into the market. Firm-2 moves first and chooses to "enter" or "not enter". If it does "not enter", then firm-1 gets 10 while firm-2 gets 0. If firm-2 "enters", then firm-1 chooses either to "fight" or "not fight". If firm-1 "fights", then firm-1 gets 6 while firm-2 gets -2. If firm-1 does "not fight", then firm-1 gets 8 and firm-2 gets 2. Firm-1's strategy of "fight" is best interpreted as (a) acquiescence (b) a punitive action (c) a commitment (d) a non-credible threat

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Firm 1 and Firm 2 are Stackelberg competitors. Firm 1 is the leader and Firm 2 is the follower. They have the same cost functions: Firm 1: C₁(Q1) = 4Q1 Firm 2: C2(Q2) = 4Q2 The market demand is QD = 42 -0.5P Compute the SPE of this game. In equilibrium, Firm 1 produces Q₁= and the price is P= v, Firm 2 produces Q2=
Two duopolists are sharing a market in which they are contemplating whether to compete or to cooperate. If they cooperate and behave like a monopolist they will share the monopolist profit of $1800. If they compete each will get a profit of $800 but if one them cooperates while the other chooses to compete the one who cooperates gets $700 while the one who competes will end up with $1000. Set-up the game, explain the process and show the Nash-equilibrium reached when the game is played.
Company A and Company B are competing oligopolists. Both companies are considering increasing or maintaining their prices. The payoff matrix shows the profits of the companies in millions based on their possible actions.. Company A Increase Price Company B Increase Price Maintain Price $50, $40 Maintain Price $55, $45 $35, $30 $60, $35 The government offers a $5 million subsidy to maintain current pricing. What is the expected outcome of the new payoff matrix, given the subsidy? The Nash equilibrium changes, and both companies will maintain their prices The Nash equilibrium changes, and both companies will increase their prices. The Nash equilibrium remains the same, and both companies will increase their prices Company A will increase its price, while Company B maintains its price. Company A will maintain its price, while Company B increases its price
Two firms are engaged in Cournot (simultaneous quantity) competition. Market-level inverse demand is given by P = 160 − 4Q Firm 1 has constant marginal costs of MC1 = 8, while Firm 2 has constant marginal costs of MC2 = 24. 1) Does there exist a low enough positive marginal cost for firm 1 such that firm 1 acts like a monopoly in this market, if so what is the MC if not why?
Two identical firms compete as a Cournot duopoly. The demand they face is P = 100-2Q. The cost function for each firm is C(Q)= 40. In equilibrium, the deadweight loss is Multiple Choice $256. $512 $128 5394
Consider a game where a potential market Entrant is trying to decide whether or not to enter the market. An Incumbent monopolist is established and can choose to cut the price, maintain the price, or raise the price in hopes of deterring the Entrant from entering. Incumbent Entrant Enter Stay Out Cut Price -4,4 0,9 Maintain Price 4,6 0,12 Raise Price 5,5 0, 13 a) Suppose the Entrant and the Incumbent make their decisions simultaneously. Is there a pure strategy Nash equilibrium? If so, what is it? b) Suppose the players move sequentially, and that the Entrant moves first. Set up the game tree and solve for the equilibrium path. Can the Incumbent deter entry? Explain. c) Now suppose that the Incumbent moves first. Again, set up the game tree. What is the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium outcome now? Can the Incumbent deter entry now?
Two firms produce a homogeneous good and compete in price. Prices can only take integer values. The demand curve is Q = 6 p, where p denotes the lower of the two prices. The lower - priced firm meets all the market demand. If the two firms post the same price p, each one gets half the market demand at that price, i. e., each gets (6p)/2. Production cost is zero.a) Show that the best response to your rival posting a price of 6 is to post the monopoly price of 3. What is the best response against a rival's price of 4? of 5?
Please help with these two: 1. Consider a Duopoly model, in which two firms decide a quantity simultaneously. If they collude (setting the total quantity together), then each firm can earn (higher, or lower) profit than in the Cournot equilibrium. 2. Consider a collusion with two firms. The joint profit is maximized by setting quantity and price together. Each firm sells the agreed amount. However, believing that the other firm sells the agreed amount, there is always a temptation for the firm sell (more, or less) than the agreed amount.
true or false The oligopolist reduces the price of the good by 10%, but the competitors reduced their prices by 8%. As a result, the oligopolist only attracts only an additional 5% consumers from his competitors, This will reduce the total revenue of the oligopolist.
You have three tickets to a Celtics game on a night that you are going to be out of town (so the value of unsold tickets is zero to you). There are only four possible buyers of a Celtics ticket. The table below lists the respective reservation prices of these four possible buyers: Customer Reservation Price 1 $25 2 $35 3 $50 4 $60 You consider inviting bids using an English auction to sell your tickets. How much total revenue can you generate using the English auction mechanism from the sale of the three tickets? [Bids can be made in increments of $1.00]
Which of the following methods could a cartel NOT use to prevent its member fırms from breaking their agreements? If a member fırm breaks its agreement, it is a breach of contract and the firm is subject to legal penalties. The cartel acts as a monopolist, maximizing the combined profits of all the member firms. All of the other choices could be used to prevent member firms from breaking agreements. The cartel requires member firms to structure executive pay in such a way that the executives benefit personally from preserving the cartel. If a member firm breaks its agreement, that firm is kicked out of the cartel permanently and can no longer earn cartel profits in the future.
Two firms produce goods that are imperfect substitutes. If firm 1 charges price p1 and firm 2 charges price p2, then their respective demands are q1 = 12 - 2p1 + p2 and q2 = 12 + p1 - 2p2 So this is like Bertrand competition, except that when p1 > p2, firm 1 still gets a positive demand for its product. Regulation does not allow either firm to charge a price higher than 20. Both firms have a constant marginal cost c = 4. (a) Construct the best reply function BR1(p2) for firm 1. That is, p1 = BR1(p2) is the optimal price for firm 1 if it is known that firm 2 charges a price p2. Construct a Nash equilibrium in pure strategies for this game. Are there any Nash equilibria in mixed strategies? If yes, construct one; if no provide a justification. (b) Notice that for any given price p1, firm 1’s demand increases with p2, so firm 1 is better off when firm 2 charges a high price p2. What is the best reply to p2 = 20? What is the best reply to p2 = 0 (c) What prices for firm 1 are…