Actual Standard CostStandardVarianceCostper TonCostDirect labor€ 38,100€0.544€ 36,992€1,108 USugar beets64,8290.95364,80425 UVariable overhead28,2110.40027,2001,011UFixed overhead45,2270.69647,3282,101 FTotal€176,367€2.593€176,324€ 43 USenior management was not surprised at the small variances for labor and sugar beets.The processing plant has good operating controls and there had been no surprises in thesugar beet market or in the labor market. Its initial forecasts proved to be good.Management was delighted to see the favorable total overhead variance (€1,090F =€1,011A + €2,101F). Although variable overhead was over budget, fixed overhead wasbelow budget and more than offset the over-budget variable overhead. No majorchange had taken place in the plant's production technology to explain this shift (suchas increased automation). Therefore, senior management was prepared to attribute thefavorable total overhead variance to better internal control by the plant manager.a. What do you think is the reason for the overhead variances?b. Is it appropriate to base next year's standards on last year's costs? AIP 11.5 Overhead Variances LO 2, 6, AppendixEuropa Sugar processes sugar beets into granulated sugar that is sold to foodcompanies. It uses a standard cost system to aid in the control of costs and forperformance evaluation. To compute the standards for next year, the actual expenseincurred by expense category is divided by the number of tons of sugar beets processedto arrive at a standard cost per ton. These per-ton standards then are increased by theexpected amount of inflation forecast for that expense category. This year, EuropaSugar processed 6.3 million tons of beets. The calculation of next year's standard costsis as follows:Europa SugarStandard Costs for Next Year(thousands of euros)Cost perTonThis Year'sInflation Standard CostCostAdjusmentper TonDirect labor€ 33,000€0.5244.0%€0.544Sugar beets58,0000.9213.50.953Variable overhead24,0000.3815.00.400Fixed overhead43,0000.6832.00.696Total€158,000€2.509€2.593Next year, actual production is 6.8 million tons. At the end of next year, the followingreport is prepared:Europa SugarActual Results compared to StandardNext Year(thousands of euros)

Name: Actual Standard CostStandardVarianceCostper TonCostDirect labor€ 38,1
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T06:32:49.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: Actual Standard CostStandardVarianceCostper TonCostDirect labor€ 38,100€0.544€ 36,992€1,108 USugar beets64,8290.95364,80425 UVariable overhead28,2110.40027,2001,011UFixed overhead45,2270.69647,3282,101 FTotal€176,367€2.593€176,324€ 43 USenior manage

Overhead Costs : These expenses are incurred by the company and are shown in the income statement,…

Business

Accounting

Actual Standard Cost Standard Variance Cost per Ton Cost Direct labor € 38,100 €0.544 € 36,992 €1,108 U Sugar beets 64,829 0.953 64,804 25 U Variable overhead 28,211 0.400 27,200 1,011 U Fixed overhead 45,227 0.696 47,328 2,101 F Total €176,367 €2.593 €176,324 € 43 U Senior management was not surprised at the small variances for labor and sugar beets. The processing plant has good operating controls and there had been no surprises in the sugar beet market or in the labor market. Its initial forecasts proved to be good. Management was delighted to see the favorable total overhead variance (€1,090F €1,011A + €2,101F). Although variable overhead was over budget, fixed overhead was below budget and more than offset the over-budget variable overhead. No major change had taken place in the plant's production technology to explain this shift (such as increased automation). Therefore, senior management was prepared to attribute the favorable total overhead variance to better internal control by the plant manager. a. What do b. Is it appropriate to base next vear's standards on last vear's costs? you think is the reason for the overhead variances?

Actual Standard Cost Standard Variance Cost per Ton Cost Direct labor € 38,100 €0.544 € 36,992 €1,108 U Sugar beets 64,829 0.953 64,804 25 U Variable overhead 28,211 0.400 27,200 1,011 U Fixed overhead 45,227 0.696 47,328 2,101 F Total €176,367 €2.593 €176,324 € 43 U Senior management was not surprised at the small variances for labor and sugar beets. The processing plant has good operating controls and there had been no surprises in the sugar beet market or in the labor market. Its initial forecasts proved to be good. Management was delighted to see the favorable total overhead variance (€1,090F €1,011A + €2,101F). Although variable overhead was over budget, fixed overhead was below budget and more than offset the over-budget variable overhead. No major change had taken place in the plant's production technology to explain this shift (such as increased automation). Therefore, senior management was prepared to attribute the favorable total overhead variance to better internal control by the plant manager. a. What do b. Is it appropriate to base next vear's standards on last vear's costs? you think is the reason for the overhead variances?

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

1
Question 19?
A 1 Original Data: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Part 1 13 14 15 16 Estimated MOH Estimated DLHS 28 29 B Selling price per unit Direct materials per unit Direct labour per unit Direct labour-hours per unit Estimated annual productio POR: 17 18 Sales 19 Less product costs 20 21 22 23 Total product costs 24 Product margin Direct materials Direct labour Manufacturing overhead 25 Units produced and sold: 26 Product margin per unit 27 $1,350,000 112,500 High Grade $212.50 $83.50 $30.00 1.00 75,000 High Grade D Professional $387.00 $212.00 $45.00 1.50 25,000 per DLHs Professional Total
sa
Direct Labor Actual Data: Units produced Direct Labor Standard Cost Data per 1 Unit Quantity Price 2 hrs $41/hr SHOW ALL COMPUTATIONS. 20 units 39 hrs; total cost $1560 Compute rate variance, efficiency variance, direct labor variance
7 Skipped Pedregon Corporation has provided the following information: Direct materials Direct labor Variable manufacturing overhead Fixed manufacturing overhead Sales commissions Variable administrative expense Fixed selling and administrative expense If 6,500 units are sold, the total variable cost is closest to: Multiple Choice $93,600 $112,450 $83,525 $75,400 Cost per Unit $ 6.60 $ 3.60 $ 1.40 $ 0.60 $ 0.65 Cost Per $23 $ 3
5 Vista Company reports the following information. Direct materials Direct labor Variable overhead Fixed overhead Units produced Compute its product cost per unit under absorption costing. Multiple Choice $76.00. $152.00. $171.00. $ 44 per unit 64 per unit $ 44 per unit $ 380,000 per year 20,000 units < Pr
Please do not give solution in image format thanku
8:30 W W M b b ba Bit Fren Use the following information for Short Exercises $21-2 and S21-3. Variable Costing Product Cost X 49 37% Period Cost ||| 0 < : X
Required information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] Oak Mart, a producer of solid oak tables, reports the following data from its second year of business. Sales price per unit $ Units produced this year Units sold this year 300 per unit 115,000 units 118,250 units 3,250 units Units in beginning-year inventory Beginning inventory costs Variable (3,250 units x $135) Fixed (3,250 units x $80) $ 438,750 260,000 Total $ 698,750 Manufacturing costs this year Direct materials $ Direct labor $ Overhead costs this year Variable overhead $3,000,000 Fixed overhead $7,400,000 Selling and administrative costs this year Variable $1,300,000 Fixed 4,400,000 2. Prepare the current-year income statement for the company using absorption costing. OAK MART COMPANY S
Planned amount A - 100 units, planned amount B - 160 units Actual amoint A - 80 units, actual amount B - 200 units Fixed overhead costs 60000$ Fixed overhead costs for the actual volume of product B ?
Material costs Utilities costs Review costs Alternative 1 $86,000 $42,000 $39,000 $49,000 Alternative 2 $86,000 $41,100 $41,100 $49,000 Direct labor costs Identify the costs that are relevant and the costs that are not relevant, given the choice of alternatives. Calculate the differential cost between the alternatives. a. Material cost Utilities cost Review cost Direct labor cost b. Differential cost