Epistemic Injustice Download Epistemic Injustice,” Huzeyfe Demirtas says that epistemic injustice occurs when “due to unjustified prejudice, someone is unfairly judged to not have the knowledge or reasonable beliefs that they actually have.” Demirtas provides the following examples of epistemic injustice: “Suppose a jury rejects a Black defendant’s testimony because they believe that Black people are often untrustworthy. Or suppose the male members of a board reject a female colleague’s suggestions because they believe that women are too often irrational. Imagine also a woman whose postpartum depression is dismissed by her doctor as mere ‘baby blues.’” (emphasis added) Reflect on an instance of epistemic injustice in your own life. Describe an event from your life which seemed to involve epistemic injustice. This could be an event in which you were the victim of epistemic injustice, in that someone did not trust you or believe what you said because. Or it could be an event in which you were a bystander, and saw epistemic injustice inflicted on someone else. Or perhaps you can recall a moment in which you were the perpetrator, and inflicted epistemic injustice on someone. Explain how this event from your life counts as an instance of epistemic injustice. Be sure what you’re describing is epistemic injustice, specifically, and not just discrimination more generally. Consider section #4 (“How to Prevent Epistemic Injustice”) from the “Epistemic Justice” article. What changes could be made to prevent the sort of epistemic injustice from your life that you described from continuing to happen? For instance, what could those involved have done differently to avoid this injustice? Or what social or institutional changes could happen to prevent this type of injustice?
“Epistemic Injustice Download Epistemic Injustice,” Huzeyfe Demirtas says that epistemic injustice occurs when “due to unjustified prejudice, someone is unfairly judged to not have the knowledge or reasonable beliefs that they actually have.” Demirtas provides the following examples of epistemic injustice:
“Suppose a jury rejects a Black defendant’s testimony because they believe that Black people are often untrustworthy. Or suppose the male members of a board reject a female colleague’s suggestions because they believe that women are too often irrational. Imagine also a woman whose postpartum depression is dismissed by her doctor as mere ‘baby blues.’” (emphasis added)
Reflect on an instance of epistemic injustice in your own life. Describe an event from your life which seemed to involve epistemic injustice.
- This could be an event in which you were the victim of epistemic injustice, in that someone did not trust you or believe what you said because.
- Or it could be an event in which you were a bystander, and saw epistemic injustice inflicted on someone else.
- Or perhaps you can recall a moment in which you were the perpetrator, and inflicted epistemic injustice on someone.
Explain how this event from your life counts as an instance of epistemic injustice. Be sure what you’re describing is epistemic injustice, specifically, and not just discrimination more generally.
Consider section #4 (“How to Prevent Epistemic Injustice”) from the “Epistemic Justice” article. What changes could be made to prevent the sort of epistemic injustice from your life that you described from continuing to happen? For instance, what could those involved have done differently to avoid this injustice? Or what social or institutional changes could happen to prevent this type of injustice?
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
