Consider a market with two firms, Kellogg and Post, that sell breakfast cereals. Both companies must choose whether to charge a high price ($4.00) or a low price ($2.50) for their cereals. These price strategies, with corresponding profits, are depicted in the payoff matrix to the right. Kellogg's profits are in red and Post's are in blue. Kellogg What is the cooperative equilibrium for this game? Price = $4.00 Price = $2.50 O A. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg to choose a price of $2.50 and Post to choose a price of $4.00. $800 Price = $4.00 $50 %3D O B. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg and Post to both choose a price of $2.50. Post of $4.00. OC. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg and Post to both choose a price $350 O D. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg to choose a price of $4.00 and $350 Price = $2.50 $50 Post to choose a price of $2.50. O E. A cooperative equilibrium does not exist for this game. Clear all Chec 88,092 2 47

Consider a market with two firms, Kellogg and Post, that sell breakfast cereals. Both companies must choose whether to charge a high price ($4.00) or a low price ($2.50) for their cereals. These price strategies, with corresponding profits, are depicted in the payoff matrix to the right. Kellogg's profits are in red and Post's are in blue. Kellogg What is the cooperative equilibrium for this game? Price = $4.00 Price = $2.50 O A. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg to choose a price of $2.50 and Post to choose a price of $4.00. $800 Price = $4.00 $50 %3D O B. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg and Post to both choose a price of $2.50. Post of $4.00. OC. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg and Post to both choose a price $350 O D. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg to choose a price of $4.00 and $350 Price = $2.50 $50 Post to choose a price of $2.50. O E. A cooperative equilibrium does not exist for this game. Clear all Chec 88,092 2 47

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter15: Imperfect Competition

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 15.5P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider a market with two firms, Kellogg and Post, that sell breakfast cereais. Both companies must choose whether to charge a high price ($5.00) or a low price ($3.00) for their cereals. These price strategies, with corresponding profits, are depicted in the payoff matrix to the right. Kellogg's profits are in red and Post's are in blue. What is the cooperative equilibrium for this game? Kelogg Price- $5.00 Price $3.00 OA The cooperative equilibrium is for Kelogg to choose a price of $3.00 and Post to choose a price of $5.00. OB. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg and Post to both choose a price of $3.00. OC. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg and Post to both choose a price of $5.00. OD. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg to choose a price of $5.00 and Post to choose a price dk $3.00. OF Acooperative equilibrium does not exist for this game 00 Price= $5.00 1200 S000 $1.000 Post Is the cooperative equilibrium ikely to occur? $1.000 Price $3.00 450 The…
Consider a market with two firms, Kellogg and Post, that sell breakfast cereals. Both companies must choose whether to charge a high price ($4.00) or a low price ($2.50) for their cereals. These price strategies, with corresponding profits, are depicted in the payoff matrix to the right. Kellogg's profits are in red and Post's are in blue. Kellogg What is the cooperative equilibrium for this game? $4.00 Price = $2.50 Price = O A. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg to choose a price of $2.50 and $800 $50 Post to choose a price of $4.00. Price = $4.00 $800 %3D OB. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg and Post to both choose a price 006$ of $2.50. Post C. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg and Post to both choose a price of $4.00. Price = $2.50 $350 OD. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg to choose a price of $4.00 and Post to choose a price of $2.50. %3D $50 $350 OE. A cooperative equilibrium does not exist for this game. Is the cooperative equilibrium likely…
Intel and AMD are the two dominant producers of microchip processors. The following matrix gives the payoffs (in millions of dollars) of the two firms for different combinations of their pricing strategies. The first number is Intel's payoff and the second AMD's. AMD Intel Low Price High Price Low Price 35, 30 30, 60 High Price 70,25 65,55 O If this game is played sequentially, the Nash equilibrium will not change irrespective of who moves first. If this one-shot game is repeated for 10 times, the Nash equilibrium is for both firms to choose High Price. O In this game, Pareto criterion leads both firms to choose High Price. This game is an example of coordination game.
Imagine that there are two snowboard manufacturers (FatSki and WideBoard) in the market. Each firm can either produce ten or twenty snowboards per day. The table below (see attached) shows the profit per snowboard for each firm that will result given the joint production decisions of these two firms. Draw the game payoff matrix for this situation. Does either player have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? What is the Nash equilibrium solution and how many boards should each player produce each day? Since FatSki and WideBoard must play this game repeatedly (i.e. make production decisions every day), what strategy would you advise them to play in order to maximize their payoff over the long term?
Suppose that Flashfry and Warmbreeze are the only two firms in a hypothetical market that produce and sell air fryers. The following payoff matrix gives profit scenarios for each company (in millions of dollars), depending on whether it chooses to set a high or low price for fryers. Warmbreeze Pricing High Low Flashfry Pricing High 11, 11 2, 15 Low 15, 2 8, 8 For example, the lower-left cell shows that if Flashfry prices low and Warmbreeze prices high, Flashfry will earn a profit of $15 million, and Warmbreeze will earn a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Flashfry and Warmbreeze are both profit-maximizing firms. If Flashfry prices high, Warmbreeze will make more profit if it chooses a price, and if Flashfry prices low, Warmbreeze will make more profit if it chooses a price. If Warmbreeze prices high, Flashfry will make more profit if it chooses a price, and if Warmbreeze prices low, Flashfry will make more profit if…
Suppose that Flashfry and Warmbreeze are the only two firms in a hypothetical market that produce and sell air fryers. The following payoff matrix gives profit scenarios for each company (in millions of dollars), depending on whether it chooses to set a high or low price for fryers. Flashfry Pricing High Low For example, the lower-left cell shows that if Flashfry prices low and Warmbreeze prices high, Flashfry will earn a profit of $15 million, and Warmbreeze will earn a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Flashfry and Warmbreeze are both profit-maximizing firms. Warmbreeze Pricing High Low 9,9 2,15 15, 2 8,8 If Flashfry prices high, Warmbreeze will make more profit if it chooses a chooses a price. If Warmbreeze prices high, Flashfry will make more profit if it chooses a chooses a price. Considering all of the information given, pricing low True O False price, and if Flashfry prices low, Warmbreeze will make more profit if it price, and if Warmbreeze…
4. Using a payoff matrix to determine the equilibrium outcome Suppose that Flashfry and Warmbreeze are the only two firms in a hypothetical market that produce and sell air fryers. The following payoff matrix gives profit scenarios for each company (in millions of dollars), depending on whether it chooses to set a high or low price for fryers. Flashfry Pricing High Low Warmbreeze Pricing High Low 11, 11 2,13 13, 2 10, 10 For example, the lower-left cell shows that if Flashfry prices low and Warmbreeze prices high, Flashfry will earn a profit of $13 million, and Warmbreeze will earn a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Flashfry and Warmbreeze are both profit-maximizing firms. price, and if Flashfry prices low, Warmbreeze will make more profit if it If Flashfry prices high, Warmbreeze will make more profit if it chooses a chooses a price. If Warmbreeze prices high, Flashfry will make more profit if it chooses a chooses a price. Considering all of the…
Two firms, X and Y, are involved in a price war. The demand equations for each firm are the following: Qx = 52 - 2Px + Py Qy = 52 - 2Py + Px Further, assume the cost of each unit of out is constant at $4. What is the Nash equilibrium of this game? (Use the best response functions in a graph to answer) There is no Nash equilibrium O $24 $20 $22
Consider the following game: Mercedes-Benz and Honda are the only two firms in the market for automobiles. Each firm has two strategies: produce high-grade vehicles or produce low-grade vehicles. The first entry in the bracket is the payoffs (in $billion) of Mercedes-Benz and the second entry is the payoffs of Honda. (see the image) What is the dominant strategy of Mercedes-Benz and Honda? Also, what is the Nash equilibrium of this game?
Two firms, Tim Horbucks and Startons, consider enter the market for take-out coffee, or not. The profit each firm can make (in dollars) is indicated in the table below, where the fixed cost of producing is F dollars. What is the largest value of F below which the game has a UNIQUE Nash equilibrium in pure strategies? Startons Enter Not Enter Enter 400 - F, 400 - F 600 - F,0 Tim Horbucks Not Enter 0, 600 - F 0 ,0 Enter a positive number below, in dollars.
E3
2