Demonstrate how the yen guidelines of constructive conflict management may be used in changing the same scenario from a negative experience to a positive experience. 1. express anger directly and with kindness. 2. check out your interpretation of others' behaviors. 3. to avoid attacks Use I statements. 4. avoid mixed or double messages. 5. when you can choose the time and place carefully. 6. address a specific issue ask for a specific change and be open to compromise. 7. be willing to change yourself. 8. don't try to win. 9. practice forgiveness. 10. end the argument.
For I assault, denounce, or pin others and set them on edge using horrendous clash strategies like pummeling entryways, annoying, condemning, ridiculing, copying, verbally abusing, jeering, moving the eyes, or giving individuals the quiet treatment?
Do I utilize valuable clash strategies like quieting down, looking to talk non-protectively, utilizing a delicate voice, calling "Break" when I feel like I could utilize a horrendous struggle strategy, trying to accomplish a trade off, or just settling the contention by settling on a truce?
Do I relax the contention by valuably zeroing in on sentiments first (i.e., "This is the way in which I feel when...") and afterward continuing on to the particular issue or protest?
Do I zero in on each particular issue in turn and look to determine it prior to continuing on to another issue, so the contention doesn't decline into a mudslinging challenge?
Would I be able to distinguish examples of disastrous conduct and spotlight on the basic underlying drivers for these examples like power and control, responsibility, neglected requirements, acknowledgment, appreciation, and trustworthiness?
Do I suppose mutual benefit and get that on the off chance that one individual loses the contention, the two individuals in the relationship lose?
Would I be able to quiet myself when I am feeling irate, baffled, or overpowered and oppose utilizing horrendous clash strategies so I can try not to make statements that are harmful?
Would I be able to quiet my accomplice by talking non-protectively, approving their insights and sentiments, or utilizing humor?
Do I "express whatever i might be thinking" and "intend what I say" during a contention while being aware of the other individual's sentiments and discernments?
Do I look to determine the particular issue at the earliest opportunity to abstain from encountering continuous disdain, disappointment, or hurt sentiments?
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
