Consider the following payoff matrix for two oligopolists that are deciding what quantity to produce: Firm 2 High Quantity Low Quantity $70k; $70k $130k; $20k High Quantity Firm 1 $20k; $130k $100k; $100k Low Quantity In the Nash equilibrium of this game, what are the payoffs to each firm? O a. Firm 1 receives $130k and Firm 2 receives $20k O b. Firm 1 receives $20k and Firm 2 receives $130k. O c. Firm 1 receives $100k and Firm 2 receives $100k. O d. Firm 1 receives $70k and Firm 2 receives $70k.

Consider the following payoff matrix for two oligopolists that are deciding what quantity to produce: Firm 2 High Quantity Low Quantity $70k; $70k $130k; $20k High Quantity Firm 1 $20k; $130k $100k; $100k Low Quantity In the Nash equilibrium of this game, what are the payoffs to each firm? O a. Firm 1 receives $130k and Firm 2 receives $20k O b. Firm 1 receives $20k and Firm 2 receives $130k. O c. Firm 1 receives $100k and Firm 2 receives $100k. O d. Firm 1 receives $70k and Firm 2 receives $70k.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Can you assist with all questions please?
Consider the example at the beginning of the chap- ter. Suppose that there are only two blockbusters jockeying for position: Warner Bros.'s Harry Potter and Fox's Narnia. Suppose that blockbusters released in November share a total of $500 million in ticket revenues, whereas blockbusters released in Decembershare a total of $800 million(a) Formulate the game played by Warner Bros. and Fox.
in this game table, Pepsi's payout is on the left and Sam's Choice's is on the ight. Is the Nash equilibrium a prisoner's dilemma? Pepsi High Low Sam's Choice High 110, 20 60, 10 Low 80, 40 70, 30 O No, it is not because both firms played their dominant strategies. O Yes, it is because the combined payoff for the two firms is lower than another outcome. O Yes, it is because at least one of the firms ends up with the lowest possible payoff. O No, it is not because at least one firm has achieved its highest possible payoff.
Take care of plagiarism.
Little Kona is a small coffee company that is considering entering a market dominated by Big Brew. Each company's profit depends on whether Little Kona enters and whether Big Brew sets a high price or a low price: Little Kona True True or False: Only Little Kona has a dominant strategy in this game. False Big Brew High Price Low Price Enter $2 million, $3 million $2 million, $1 million Don't Enter 50, 58 million $0, $3 million Which of the following outcomes represent a Nash equilibrium in this case? Check all that apply. Big Brew maintains a high price and Little Kona does not enter. Big Brew maintains a low price and Little Kona does not enter. Big Brew maintains a high price and Little Kona enters. Big Brew maintains a low price and Little Kona enters. Big Brew threatens Little Kona by saying, "If you enter, we're going to set a low price, so you had better stay out." Thin True or False: Little Kona should believe the threat.
Consider a oligopoly with two firms. Each firm has constant marginal cost of 3 dollar per unit and zero fixed costs. Suppose the market demand curve is P = 15-Q, where Q=Q1+Q2 is the sum of the quantities produced by both firms. Suppose each firm can produce either 1, 2, 3, or 4 units. Which of the following is an optimal collusive outcome for the firms? O Each firm produces 2 units. Each firm produces 4 units. O Each firm produces 3 units. O Each firm produces 1 unit.
Question 2 Suppose there are two players, an entrant and an incumbent firm playing the following game: the entrant decides whether to stay out or enter. The incumbent decides whether to innovate or not. If the entrant stays out, the entrant firm gets a payoff of 0 whereas the incumbent firm gets a payoff od 1500, independent of the action of the incumbent firm. If the entrant enters and the incumbent doesn't innovate, the entrant gets 1200 whereas the incumbent gets 500. If the entrant enters and the incumbent innovates, the entrant and the incumbent get a payoff of 1000 each. a) Draw the normal form of the game and solve for the Nash equilibrium/equilibria. b) Suppose the game is dynamic: first the entrant decides whether to enter or stay out. If the entrant enters, the incumbent decides whether to innovate or not. If the entrant stays out, the incumbent doesn't get to play. Draw the extensive form of the fame, mark the subgames on paper and solve for the subgame-perfect Nash…
Two companies are playing the following entry game: Firm 2 Do Not Enter O 1/3 2/5 O 2/3 O 1/5 Enter 0 1 Do Not Enter Firm 1 0 0 0 -2 Enter In mixed-strategies Nash equilibrium Firm 1 enters the market with probability of: 1 -2
Wal-Mart's dominant strategy is to pick a price of $. Target Price = $30 Price = $17 %3D What is the Nash equilibrium for this game? $6,000 $1,500 O A. The Nash equilibrium is for Target to choose a price of $17 and Wal-Mart to choose a price of $30. Price = $30 $6,000 $11,000 O B. The Nash equilibrium is for Target and Wal-Mart to both choose a price of $30. Wal - Mart C. The Nash equilibrium is for Target to choose a price of $30 and Wal-Mart to choose a price of $17. $11,000 $4,500 Price = $17 %3D $1,500 $4,500 O D. The Nash equilibrium is for Target and Wal-Mart to both choose a price of $17. South OE. O E. A Nash equilibrium does not exist for this game.
Use the following game table to answer the question: Player 2 Y 6, 3 1, 3 A 10, 5 0,0 Player 1 B 2,6 0,0 3,5 3, 4 3, 3 Is the Nash equilibrium of this game for Player 1 to choose A and Player 2 to choose X? Why or why not? O It is; if Player 2 chose B or C they would get less than 10, and if Player 1 chose Y or Z they would get less than 5. It is not; Player 2 could get 6, instead of 5, if they chose B. O It is; if Player 1 chose B or C they would get less than 10, and if Player 2 chose Y or Z they would get less than 5. It is; if Player 2 chose B or C they would get less than 5, and if Player 1 chose Y or Z they would get less than 10. It is not; Player 1 could get 6, instead of 5, if they chose B.
Please no written by hand and no emage
Hal and Nick are racing to develop a new brand of coconut milk that they both believe will be the next big soft drink. The payoff matrix shows the economic profit in millions of dollars for the game that Hal and Nick play. O A. Hal and Nick will never cooperate in this research. OB. Hal and Nick will cooperate in this research every time they play the game. Q Search OC. It is possible for cooperation in this research and development game if the game is played repeatedly and cheating on the agreement is punished using a tit-for-tat strategy OD. Hal and Nick will cooperate in this research only if a threat exists that a third firm will enter the coconut milk market Pat's strategies (blue squares) Develop Not develop 0 Hal's strategies (red squares) Develop -1.0 2.5 2.5 1.0 Not develop Next -1.0 1.0