Consider the effects of pollution in a competitive market for paper, the production of which generates a negative externality (pollution or gunk, g). What are the optimal emissions fee and the optimal tax on output (assuming that only a single, constant fee or tax is applied)? MC = MCP + MC MCP The tax (or emissions fee) that would generate the optimal outcome for society is a tax on paper production of t=$. (Enter your response as a whole number.) n 282 240 198 MC 84 D 84 105 Q, Tons of paper per day Price of paper, p. S per ton

Consider the effects of pollution in a competitive market for paper, the production of which generates a negative externality (pollution or gunk, g). What are the optimal emissions fee and the optimal tax on output (assuming that only a single, constant fee or tax is applied)? MC = MCP + MC MCP The tax (or emissions fee) that would generate the optimal outcome for society is a tax on paper production of t=$. (Enter your response as a whole number.) n 282 240 198 MC 84 D 84 105 Q, Tons of paper per day Price of paper, p. S per ton

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Use the following diagram of the market for product X to answer the question below. Price Q₁ Qo Q₂ Quantity D₁ Curve S, embodies all costs (including externalities) and D, embodies all benefits (including externalities) associated with the production and consumption of X. Assuming the market equilibrium output is Q₁, we can conclude that the existence of external A) costs has resulted in an underallocation of resources to X. B) costs has resulted in an overallocation of resources to X. C) benefits has resulted in an overallocation of resources to X. D) benefits has resulted in an underallocation of resources to X.
Consider two firms with the following marginal abatement costs (MAC) as a function of emissions (E): MAC_1 = 25 - E_1 MAC_2 = 30 - 2E_2, and assume marginal external damages (MED) from the aggregate emissions of both firms (E_Agg = E_1 + E_2) is: MED = 2E_Agg. To achieve the socially efficient level of aggregate emissions (E*_Agg), the government institutes a cap and trade policy and sets the permit cap equal to ____.
Please no written by hand
Consider a market with the following supply and demand. (It may help to draw a graph for these questions.) P 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 QS 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 QD 800 750 700 650 600 550 500 450 400 350 If there is an external cost of $3, what is the efficient quantity? If there is an external benefit of $3, what is the efficient quantity? For the remaining questions assume that there is a $3 external COST. If the government wants to get the efficient quantity with a per/unit tax, how much should the tax be? Now imagine that they use tradable allowances. If they cap the quantity at 400 what would the value of these allowance be in the market? (Assume the market is perfectly competitive and that "one allowance" lets you…
Consider two firms with the following marginal abatement costs (MAC) as a function of emissions (E): MAC_1 = 11 - 2E_1 MAC_2 = 8.5 - E_2, and assume marginal external damages (MED) from the aggregate emissions of both firms (E_Agg = E_1 + E_2) is: MED = .5E_Agg. To achieve the socially efficient level of aggregate emissions (E*_Agg), the government institutes a per unit subsidy to abatement equal to $____. Answer:
Viral infections such as flu are highly contagious. The number of infections and thus the spread of the disease can be prevented by getting vaccinated. However, the decision to take vaccine is voluntary and some people choose not to go for it for various reasons.] [What type of externality occurs by getting vaccinated against contagious diseases? Explain your answer in 100 words or less. [In a diagram, show the market equilibrium quantity of the vaccine. Is the quantity also socially efficient? Explain in 100 words or less and demonstrate using the same diagram. [Suggest one method to achieve a socially efficient outcome. Explain your answer in 100 or less words.
Consider two firms with the following marginal abatement costs (MAC) as a function of emissions (E): MAC_1 = 24 - 2E_1 MAC_2 = 20 - E_2, and assume marginal external damages (MED) from the aggregate emissions of both firms (E_Agg = E_1 + E_2) is: MED = 2E_Agg. To achieve the socially efficient level of aggregate emissions (E*_Agg), the government institutes a cap and trade policy and sets the cap equal to the socially efficient level of emissions (E*_Agg). If firm 2 is initially grandfathered 5 permits, it will buy more permits. (Note: your answer can be positive or negative; if it is positive, the firm is buying additional permits; if it is negative, the firm sells permits. So, for example, an answer of -10 implies that the firm sells 10 permits)
ayor Grinch imposes a $1 tax on each bottle of Zlurp. Consumption per person is now bottles. This yields a per-person consumer surplus of not including the cost of pollution, a per-person external cost of , and government revenue of per person. Total surplus per person is now as a result of this policy. (Hint: Total surplus is equal to consumer surplus minus the external cost of pollution plus government revenue.) Based on your calculations, you support the mayor's policy because it welfare compared to before the tax.
The following is a copy of the information from Question 1: Consider Product NE, which has a negative externality associated with its production and use ( i.e., the “Incidental Cost” ( IC) of each unit of Product NE is greater than zero). You are told that : * The “Efficient” Output of Product NE = 9000 units * The Free-Market Equilibrium Output of Product NE = 10,000 units * The Consumer’s Surplus + Producer’s Surplus on Unit Number 6000 ( i.e., on that one unit ALONE) is equal to $ 70 ( i.e., the sum of CS + PS = $ 70) * The Cumulative Surplus on the first 9000 units produced is equal to $ 175,000 ( i.e., the sum of the surplus( to society) on ALL 9000 units adds up to $ 175,000) Is the Cumulative Surplus on the first 10,000 units ( i.e., ALL 10,000 units together) greater than $ 175,000, less than $ 175,000, or exactly equal to $ 175,000 ? a. Greater Than $…
If the government subsidizes vaccination against influenza to internalize the externality, should it impose the subsidy on consumers or producers of flu vaccines? How large should the subsidy be? How much less per flu vaccine would patients (i.e., consumers) pay? How much more would manufacturers (i.e., producers) of flu vaccines receive?
Consider two firms with the following marginal abatement costs (MAC) as a function of emissions (E): MAC_1 = 12-2E_1 MAC_2=9-E_2, and assume marginal external damages (MED) from aggregate emissions from the two firms (E_Agg) is: MED = E_Agg. Total external damages at the socially efficient level of aggregate emissions is Answer: 1
Consider two firms with the following marginal abatement costs (MAC) as a function of emissions (E): MAC 1 10 - .5E_1 = MAC 2 20 E_2, = - and assume marginal external damages (MED) from the aggregate emissions of both firms (E_Agg = E_1 + E_2) is: MED = .5E_Agg. To achieve the socially efficient level of aggregate emissions (E*_Agg), the government institutes a cap and trade policy and sets the permit cap equal to F