Consider a remote town in which two restaurants, All-You-Can-Eat Café and GoodGrub Diner, operate in a duopoly. Both restaurants disregard health and safety regulations, but they continue to have customers because they are the only restaurants within 80 miles of town. Both restaurants know that if they clean up, they will attract more customers, but this also means that they will have to pay workers to do the cleaning. If neither restaurant cleans, each will earn $14,000; alternatively, if they both hire workers to clean, each will earn only $11,000. However, if one cleans and the other doesn't, more customers will choose the cleaner restaurant; the cleaner restaurant will make $18,000, and the other restaurant will make only $6,000. Complete the following payoff matrix using the information just given. (Note: All-You-Can-Eat Café and GoodGrub Diner are both profit-maximizing firms.) GoodGrub Diner Cleans Up Doesn't Clean Up Cleans Up %24 All-You-Can-Eat Café Doesn't Clean Up 24 %24 %24

Consider a remote town in which two restaurants, All-You-Can-Eat Café and GoodGrub Diner, operate in a duopoly. Both restaurants disregard health and safety regulations, but they continue to have customers because they are the only restaurants within 80 miles of town. Both restaurants know that if they clean up, they will attract more customers, but this also means that they will have to pay workers to do the cleaning. If neither restaurant cleans, each will earn $14,000; alternatively, if they both hire workers to clean, each will earn only $11,000. However, if one cleans and the other doesn't, more customers will choose the cleaner restaurant; the cleaner restaurant will make $18,000, and the other restaurant will make only $6,000. Complete the following payoff matrix using the information just given. (Note: All-You-Can-Eat Café and GoodGrub Diner are both profit-maximizing firms.) GoodGrub Diner Cleans Up Doesn't Clean Up Cleans Up %24 All-You-Can-Eat Café Doesn't Clean Up 24 %24 %24

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose two firms, Genera Pharma and Futura Pharma, are the only two producers of a specific drug. Genera and Futura have the same formula and sell the drug for the same price, but they are considering whether or not to spend money on an advertising campaign. Each firm can either buy the advertising campaign or not buy it and the following table shows profits for four different scenarios. Futura AD No AD AD (4,4) (12,0) Genera No AD (0,12) (8,8) 1. What is the scenario that maximizes the sum of profits of the two companies? 2. Is there a dominant strategy for each firm? 3. What is the pure strategy Nash Equilibrium? Find 4. Denote the probability of choosing AD for Futura as f and for Genera as 9. the best response function for Futura, bƒ (g), and Genera, bg (ƒ).
After graduation from business school, Pete wanted to start a new business. In competition with another firm, he became involved in developing a new technology that would allow consumers to sample food over the Internet. Given the newness of this market, technological compatibility across firms is important. Pete’s firm, DigiOdor, is far advanced in developing its Sniff technology. His competitor, WebTaste, has been working on an incompatible technology, Smell. If they both adopt the same technology, Sniff or Smell, they each may gross $150 million from the developing industry. If they adopt different technologies, consumers will later decide to purchase neither product, leading to gross sales of $0 each. In addition to the above considerations, switching over to the other technology would cost WebTaste $100 million right away and DigiOdor $250 million. In other words, WebTaste would incur additional costs of $100 million if it switched to Sniff technology, and DigiOdor would incur…
Two firms produce goods that are imperfect substitutes. If firm 1 charges price p1 and firm 2 charges price p2, then their respective demands are q1 = 12 - 2p1 + p2 and q2 = 12 + p1 - 2p2 So this is like Bertrand competition, except that when p1 > p2, firm 1 still gets a positive demand for its product. Regulation does not allow either firm to charge a price higher than 20. Both firms have a constant marginal cost c = 4. (a) Construct the best reply function BR1(p2) for firm 1. That is, p1 = BR1(p2) is the optimal price for firm 1 if it is known that firm 2 charges a price p2. Construct a Nash equilibrium in pure strategies for this game. Are there any Nash equilibria in mixed strategies? If yes, construct one; if no provide a justification. (b) Notice that for any given price p1, firm 1’s demand increases with p2, so firm 1 is better off when firm 2 charges a high price p2. What is the best reply to p2 = 20? What is the best reply to p2 = 0 (c) What prices for firm 1 are…
Janeek and Raj are the only two growers who provide organically grown com to a local grocery store. They know that if they cooperated and produced less com, they could raise the price of the corn. If they work independently, they will each earn $100. If they decide to work together and both lower their output, they can each earn $150. if one person lowers output and the other does not, the person who lowers output will earn $0 and the other person will capture the entire market and will earn $200. Reference the game illustrated below where the first payout in each cell is for Janeek and the second is for Raj. (J.R) Independent Cooperate Independent ($100, $100) ($0, $200) What is the Nash Equilibrium for this game? Ⓒ(Cooperate, Cooperate) (Cooperate, Independent) (Independent, Cooperate) (Independent, Independent) Cooperate ($200, 50) ($150, $150)
Megan and Martha own competing hair salons that are in the same neighborhood. They are both considering offering their clients discounts in order to increase business. The payoff matrix shows their yearly incomes in thousands of dollars if they offer and do not offer discounts to their customers. Martha Megan Discount No Discount Discount $50, $75 $75, $60 No Discount $35, $90 $70, $85 If both Megan and Martha did not discount, what would each earn in yearly income? Megan would earn $50,000; Martha would earn $75,000. Megan would earn $75,000; Martha would earn $60,000. Megan would earn $35,000; Martha would earn $90,000. Megan would earn $70,000; Martha would earn $85,000. Megan would earn $35,000; Martha would earn $85,000.
Two firms produce goods that are imperfect substitutes. If firm 1 charges price p1 and firm 2 charges price p2, then their respective demands are q1 = 12 - 2p1 + p2 and q2 = 12 + p1 - 2p2 So this is like Bertrand competition, except that when p1 > p2, firm 1 still gets a positive demand for its product. Regulation does not allow either firm to charge a price higher than 20. Both firms have a constant marginal cost c = 4. (a) Construct the best reply function BR1(p2) for firm 1. That is, p1 = BR1(p2) is the optimal price for firm 1 if it is known that firm 2 charges a price p2. Construct a Nash equilibrium in pure strategies for this game. Are there any Nash equilibria in mixed strategies? If yes, construct one; if no provide a justification. (b) Notice that for any given price p1, firm 1’s demand increases with p2, so firm 1 is better off when firm 2 charges a high price p2. What is the best reply to p2 = 20? What is the best reply to p2 = 0 (c) What prices for firm 1 are…
Two gas stations in a rural town can engage in collusion over pricing. Because drivers often just stop at the first station they see as they go through town, price competition is not that severe in the first place. Assume either station can price gas at $0.30 above average total cost or $0.50 above average total cost. If they have equal prices, they split the market. If they have unequal prices, the lower price station gets 75% of the market (assume for simplicity no change in the size of the market; price elasticity of demand is very low for short term changes in the price of oil).a. Draw the normal form representation of this game. Identify the key aspects of the game.b. Identify the dominant strategy, if any, for each player.c. Identify any Nash equilibria.
Two Bertrand competitors sell identical products. Each firm is located at either end of a one-mile street. Both firms have marginal costs equal to 10 per unit and no fixed costs. There are 1000 consumers located evenly along the one-mile street who incur (there-and-back) travel costs of 5 per mile. Consumers share a common valuation of 20 for the product and purchase the product so long as this value exceeds the effective price (i.e. price plus travel costs). Suppose the firms set prices sequentially (with firm 1 moving first), what is the combined total profit of both firms?
There are two oil producers, Saudi Arabia and Iran (these are countries which we are treating as players in this example). The market price will be $60/barrel if the total volume of sales is 9 million barrels daily, $50 if the total volume of sales is 11 million barrels daily, and $35 if the total volume of sales is 13 million barrels daily. Saudi Arabia has two strategies; either produce 8 million barrels daily or 6 million. Iran has two strategies; either produce 3 million barrels daily or 5 million. Assume for simplicity that marginal cost of production is zero for both countries. Here is the normal form representation of this game (where Saudi Arabia and Iran are players, they can choose strategies over what quantity to produce and they face payoffs in terms of profits). Note that the following paragraph is simply an explanation of this representation of the game. If you are already comfortable with the structure, feel free to skip to the questions below the horizontal line…
16-1. Two equal sized newspaper have an overlap in circulation of 10% (10% of the subscribers subscribe to both newspaper). Advertisers are willing to pay $10 to advertise in one newspaper but only $19 to advertise in both , because they’re are unwilling to pay twice to reach the same subscribers. What’s the likely bargaining negotiation outcome if the advertisers bargain by telling each newspaper that they’re going to reach an agreement with the other newspaper so the gains to reaching agreement are only $9? Suppose the two newspaper merge. What is the likely post merger bargaining outcome?
Deviating from the collusive outcome Mays and McCovey are beer-brewing companies that operate in a duopoly (two-firm oligopoly). The daily marginal cost (MCMC) of producing a can of beer is constant and equals $0.60 per can. Assume that neither firm had any startup costs, so marginal cost equals average total cost (ATCATC) for each firm. Suppose that Mays and McCovey form a cartel, and the firms divide the output evenly. (Note: This is only for convenience; nothing in this model requires that the two companies must equally share the output.) Place the black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate the profit-maximizing price and combined quantity of output if Mays and McCovey choose to work together. table 1 When they act as a profit-maximizing cartel, each company will produce $____ cans and charge $______per can. Given this information, each firm earns a daily profit of $______, so the daily total industry profit in the beer market is $_______.…
Suppose Fiat recently entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Case for $4.3 billion. Prior to the merger, the market for four-wheel-drive tractors consisted of five firms. The market was highly concentrated, with a Herfindahl- Hirschman index of 2,650. Case's share of that market was 18 percent, while Fiat comprised just 9 percent of the market. If approved, by how much would the postmerger Herfindahl-Hirschman index increase? Based only on this information, is the Justice Department likely to challenge the merger according to the Horizontal Merger Guidelines? Possibly - but other factors will be considered Yes Ο NO