Confused on how to answer states can have dramatically different ordering of preferences when they are driven by different interests (Hint: the parallel universe Vietnam example). Can you apply this concept to analyzing the U.S. ordering of preferences in South China Sea? Specially, what kind of interests do you think is driving the U.S. behaviors in South China Sea? And, how will this interest affect the U.S. leaders ordering of preference with regard to the following FOUR potential outcomes? 1. Denying China's control of the water without fighting a war with China. 2. Accepting China's control of the water without fighting a war with China. 3. Denying China's control of the water after fighting a war with China. 4. Accepting CHina's control of the water after fighting a war with China.

icon
Related questions
Question
Confused on how to answer states can have dramatically different ordering of preferences when they are driven by different interests (Hint: the parallel universe Vietnam example). Can you apply this concept to analyzing the U.S. ordering of preferences in South China Sea? Specially, what kind of interests do you think is driving the U.S. behaviors in South China Sea? And, how will this interest affect the U.S. leaders ordering of preference with regard to the following FOUR potential outcomes? 1. Denying China's control of the water without fighting a war with China. 2. Accepting China's control of the water without fighting a war with China. 3. Denying China's control of the water after fighting a war with China. 4. Accepting CHina's control of the water after fighting a war with China.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer