Chicken Little is risk-neutral, but is concerned about the sky falling. She believes that there is a 20% chance of this happening. If it does, her egg collection (valued at $320,000) will be crushed. A backyard bunker salesman offers to sell her a disaster shelter, installed, for only $70,000. Given Chicken Little's beliefs, should she buy the shelter?

Chicken Little is risk-neutral, but is concerned about the sky falling. She believes that there is a 20% chance of this happening. If it does, her egg collection (valued at $320,000) will be crushed. A backyard bunker salesman offers to sell her a disaster shelter, installed, for only $70,000. Given Chicken Little's beliefs, should she buy the shelter?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Many clothing stores purchased new fashions from clothing manufacturers back in the Fall, expecting to sell new fashions to consumers this Spring. Because of the pandemic, however, people are not shopping for new clothing fashions as much as the clothing retailers had expected. So these stores have on hand lots of new clothing, just sitting on their shelves, going unsold. The question for these retailers is what to do with this clothing. One option is to hang on to it and hope to sell it to consumers next year. Another option is to sell the clothing now to so-called “deep discount retailers” such as Beall’s, Marshall’s, T.J. Maxx, and Ross Dress for Less. The problem with selling to deep discount stores is that the clothing retailers will probably receive less money than they paid to get the clothing from the manufacturers. Explain whether it makes good economic sense for clothing retailers to sell their unsold clothing to deep discounters for less than they paid for it. Identify the…
Matthew is playing snooker (more difficult variant of pool) with his friend. He is not sure which strategy to choose for his next shot. He can try and pot a relatively difficult red ball (strategy R1), which he will pot with probability 0.4. If he pots it, he will have to play the black ball, which he will pot with probability 0.3. His second option (strategy R2) is to try and pot a relatively easy red, which he will pot with probability 0.7. If he pots it, he will have to play the blue ball, which he will pot with probability 0.6. His third option, (strategy R3) is to play safe, meaning not trying to pot any ball and give a difficult shot for his opponent to then make a foul, which will give Matthew 4 points with probability 0.5. If potted, the red balls are worth 1 point each, while the blue ball is worth 5 points, and the black ball 7 points. If he does not pot any ball, he gets 0 point. By using the EMV rule, which strategy should Matthew choose? And what is his expected…
1. Mel is thinking of going on a cruise. Mel values a cruise in nice weather at $2,000 and values a cruise in bad weather at $50. The probability of nice weather is 60 percent and the probability of bad weather is 40 percent. Trip insurance is sometimes available. If purchased, it allows travelers to delay the cruise until the weather is nice. Suppose that the price of the cruise is $1,200. If Mel is risk-neutral, then Mel should: not buy trip insurance. only buy trip insurance if it costs less than $780. only buy trip insurance if it costs less than $20. only buy trip insurance if it costs less than $50. 2. Several web sites, like Pricewatch.com, allow consumers to input the name of a product, and the site then returns a list of suppliers with their respective prices for the product. This: increases the benefit of search.. increases the free-rider problem. reduces the benefit of search. reduces the cost of search.
To go from Location 1 to Location 2, you can either take a car or take transit. Your utility function is: U= -1Xminutes -5Xdollars +0.13Xcar (i.e. 0.13 is the car constant) Car= 15 minutes and $8 Transit= 40 minutes and $4 What is your probability of taking transit given the conditions above? What is your probability of taking transit if the number of buses on the route were doubled, meaning the headways are halved? Remember to include units.
David is an expected-utility maximizer that likes to drive fast (and reckless at times), so his probability of an accident is 2/3. David's preferences over wealth are u(w) = vw. Suppose that David's initial wealth is $100. If David has an accident, he incurs a $51 loss. How much is the risk premium David willing to pay to be as well off in case of accident or not?
Priyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index . There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,000. a) Would Priyanka be willing to spend £500 to purchase an insurance policy that would fully insure her against this loss? Explain. b) What would be the highest price (premium) that she would be willing to pay for an insurance policy that fully insures her against the flooding damage?