Cardiology, Radiology The conventions of cardiac echocardiography are derived from comprehensive studies performed by technicians and cardiologists. Traditionally, patients are positioned supine (i.e., lying on their back), although there is no evidence to support this practice. Clinicians in the emergency department (ED) are sometimes faced with acutely ill patients who cannot tolerate the supine position. For this reason, a study is planned to compare ultrasound studies performed while a patient is supine vs. while a patient is upright. Patients > 18 years of age who present to the ED with chest pain or shortness of breath and consent to the study will be enrolled. Each patient will receive two ultrasound studies, one in the supine position and one in the upright position. The order of administration of the two studies will be at random. Readers will review the images in a blinded manner and assess a number of clinical characteristics. An important endpoint is pericardial effusion (or fluid around the heart). Suppose 50 patients are enrolled in the pilot phase of the study. i. For 28 patients it is determined from both images that there is no fluid around the heart. ii. For 9 patients it is determined from both images that there is fluid around the heart. iii. For 10 patients it is determined from the supine image, but not the upright image, that there is fluid around the heart. iv. For 3 patients it is determined from the upright image, but not the supine image, that there is fluid around the heart. You can use the Distribution Calculators page in SALT to find critical values and/or p-values to answer parts of this question. 2 (a) If we focus on patients where there are different results for the supine and upright images [i.e., groups iii and iv above], what test can be performed to assess whether there is a significant difference in determinations for supine vs. upright images? O Yates-corrected chi-square test for 2 x 2 contingency table O McNemar's test for correlated proportions (normal theory test) Mantel-Haenszel test McNemar's test for correlated proportions (exact test) Correct R (b) Perform the test in (a) and report a p-value (two-tailed). (Use a = 0.05. Let p be the proportion of images where fluid is detected in the supine image but not the upright image out of the images where different results were obtained from the two positions.) State the null and alternative hypotheses. (Enter != for # as needed.) Ho: P = 0.5 correct

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
A
Cardiology, Radiology
The conventions of cardiac echocardiography are derived from comprehensive studies performed by
technicians and cardiologists. Traditionally, patients are positioned supine (i.e., lying on their back),
although there is no evidence to support this practice. Clinicians in the emergency department (ED) are
sometimes faced with acutely ill patients who cannot tolerate the supine position. For this reason, a study is
planned to compare ultrasound studies performed while a patient is supine vs. while a patient is upright.
$
Patients 18 years of age who present to the ED with chest pain or shortness of breath and consent to the
study will be enrolled. Each patient will receive two ultrasound studies, one in the supine position and one
in the upright position. The order of administration of the two studies will be at random. Readers will review
the images in a blinded manner and assess a number of clinical characteristics. An important endpoint is
pericardial effusion (or fluid around the heart).
Suppose 50 patients are enrolled in the pilot phase of the study.
i. For 28 patients it is determined from both images that there is no fluid around the heart.
ii. For 9 patients it is determined from both images that there is fluid around the heart.
iii. For 10 patients it is determined from the supine image, but not the upright image, that
there is fluid around the heart.
iv. For 3 patients it is determined from the upright image, but not the supine image, that there
is fluid around the heart.
You can use the Distribution Calculators page in SALT to find critical values and/or p-values to answer
parts of this question.
(a) If we focus on patients where there are different results for the supine and upright images [i.e.,
groups iii and iv above], what test can be performed to assess whether there is a significant
difference in determinations for supine vs. upright images?
O Yates-corrected chi-square test for 2 x 2 contingency table
O McNemar's test for correlated proportions (normal theory test)
Mantel-Haenszel test
McNemar's test for correlated proportions (exact test)
Correct
(b) Perform the test in (a) and report a p-value (two-tailed). (Use a = 0.05. Let p be the proportion of
images where fluid is detected in the supine image but not the upright image out of the images where
different results were obtained from the two positions.)
State the null and alternative hypotheses. (Enter != for # as needed.)
Hoi
P = 0.5 correct
wh tem l
Transcribed Image Text:A Cardiology, Radiology The conventions of cardiac echocardiography are derived from comprehensive studies performed by technicians and cardiologists. Traditionally, patients are positioned supine (i.e., lying on their back), although there is no evidence to support this practice. Clinicians in the emergency department (ED) are sometimes faced with acutely ill patients who cannot tolerate the supine position. For this reason, a study is planned to compare ultrasound studies performed while a patient is supine vs. while a patient is upright. $ Patients 18 years of age who present to the ED with chest pain or shortness of breath and consent to the study will be enrolled. Each patient will receive two ultrasound studies, one in the supine position and one in the upright position. The order of administration of the two studies will be at random. Readers will review the images in a blinded manner and assess a number of clinical characteristics. An important endpoint is pericardial effusion (or fluid around the heart). Suppose 50 patients are enrolled in the pilot phase of the study. i. For 28 patients it is determined from both images that there is no fluid around the heart. ii. For 9 patients it is determined from both images that there is fluid around the heart. iii. For 10 patients it is determined from the supine image, but not the upright image, that there is fluid around the heart. iv. For 3 patients it is determined from the upright image, but not the supine image, that there is fluid around the heart. You can use the Distribution Calculators page in SALT to find critical values and/or p-values to answer parts of this question. (a) If we focus on patients where there are different results for the supine and upright images [i.e., groups iii and iv above], what test can be performed to assess whether there is a significant difference in determinations for supine vs. upright images? O Yates-corrected chi-square test for 2 x 2 contingency table O McNemar's test for correlated proportions (normal theory test) Mantel-Haenszel test McNemar's test for correlated proportions (exact test) Correct (b) Perform the test in (a) and report a p-value (two-tailed). (Use a = 0.05. Let p be the proportion of images where fluid is detected in the supine image but not the upright image out of the images where different results were obtained from the two positions.) State the null and alternative hypotheses. (Enter != for # as needed.) Hoi P = 0.5 correct wh tem l
*
X
H₁:
P‡ 0.5 correct
Find the test statistic. (If the test does not have a defined test statistic, enter DNE. Round your
answer to two decimal places.)
DNE
correct
Use technology to find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
p-value =
0.192
Interpret the results in words.
Reject Ho. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in
determinations for supine vs. upright images.
Fail to reject Ho. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference
in determinations for supine vs. upright images.
Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in
determinations for supine vs. upright images.
Fail to reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in
determinations for supine vs. upright images.
Need Help? Read It
PLEASE note! The continuity Correction formala
does not give the correct
answere.
0.192 is incorrect.
Please explain without having a test statistie
how to get the P Value using technology
Thank you!!
Transcribed Image Text:* X H₁: P‡ 0.5 correct Find the test statistic. (If the test does not have a defined test statistic, enter DNE. Round your answer to two decimal places.) DNE correct Use technology to find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) p-value = 0.192 Interpret the results in words. Reject Ho. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in determinations for supine vs. upright images. Fail to reject Ho. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in determinations for supine vs. upright images. Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in determinations for supine vs. upright images. Fail to reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in determinations for supine vs. upright images. Need Help? Read It PLEASE note! The continuity Correction formala does not give the correct answere. 0.192 is incorrect. Please explain without having a test statistie how to get the P Value using technology Thank you!!
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman