Brady leaves her diamond necklace to be repaired at Diamonds R Us, a jewelry store that sells new and used diamond jewelry, Diamonds R Us sells the necklace to Doris, who does not know that it belongs to Brad. a.Brad can successfully recover the necklace from Doris. b.Brad cannot recover from either Doris or Diamonds R Us. c.Brad can sue Diamonds R Us for the value of the necklace but cannot obtain the necklace back from Doris

Sales of goods means when ownership of the goods is transferred from one person to another person.…

Answered: Brady leaves her diamond necklace to be…

Similar questions

Caelan tells Ray, "I will sell you my computer for $2,000, and you need to let me know by tonight" Ray does not give Caelan an answer immediately. Caelan goes home and opens the laptop and it does not work. Caelan calls Ray and tells Ray the computer is no longer for sale. Ray may still force Caelan to sell the computer because Caelan made a valid offer. b. not force Caelan to sell the computer because Caelan revoked the offer. c. still force Caelan to sell the computer because it is not Ray's fault that Caelan's laptop no longer works. d. not force Caelan to sell the computer because Caelan rejected the offer. a.
Bob, an engineer, is a new employee at Airbag Industries, which specializes in manufacturing automotive airbags. Before his employment, Bob is required to sign various documents indicating that he would have access to confidential information related to Airbag Industries' business practices, customer lists, and other information that must remain confidential. It further provided that any new developments created by Bob would be the property of Airbag Industries. Further, it provided that if Bob left the company he could not compete against the company in the United States for 10 years. Bob leaves three years later to set up his own airbag company. Explain why protecting their intellectual property is important to Airbag Industries. What intellectual property issues are involved in this scenario?
Under what circumstances should a principal (employer) be responsible for the torts committed by an agent (employee)? If an agent injures a third party during the course of employment, to what extent should the employer be held liable? Under what circumstances should the agent be held personally liable? Provide an example to illustrate your opinion. What ethical considerations underlie the doctrine of respondeat superior?
Michael Hauck claimed that he was discharged by his employer, Sabine Pilot Service, because he refused its direction to perform the illegal act of pumping the bilges of the employer’s vessel into the waterways. Hauck was an employee at will, and Sabine contends that it therefore had the right to discharge him without having to show cause. Hauck brought a wrongful discharge action against Sabine. Decide.Please give your answer using the IRAC format. Issue: Call of the QuestionRule: Rule of Law to be applied to properly answer the questionAnalysis: Applying the rule of law to the facts of the problem presentedConclusion: Answer to the Issue
9
Sam Simpleton, a resident of Kansas, and Nellie Naive, a resident of Missouri, each bought $85,000 in stock at local offices in their home States from Evil Stockbrokers, Inc. (“Evil”), a business incorporated in Delaware, with its principal place of business in Kansas. Both Simpleton and Naive believe that they were cheated by Evil Stockbrokers and would like to sue Evil for fraud. Assuming that no Federal question is at issue, assess the accuracy of the following statements: a. Simpleton can sue Evil in a Kansas State trial court. b. Simpleton can sue Evil in a Federal district court in Kansas. c. Naive can sue Evil in a Missouri State trial court. d. Naive can sue Evil in a Federal district court in Missouri.
Ma3. Explain in brief. Sally Henderson is an employee of Good Eats Restaurant. Sally's contract with Good Eats Restaurant states: "Sally Henderson shall ensure the bathrooms and dining room area are reasonably clean during operating hours." Sally's good friend James is also employed by Good Eats Restaurant as a parking attendant, a person who parks customers’ cars. On a very busy night at Good Eats Restaurant, without the authorization of Good Eats Restaurant, Sally decided to help her friend James park cars. Sally injures a customer due to Sally's negligent driving while parking cars. The injured customer sues Sally and Good Eats Restaurant. Is it likely that Good Eats Restaurant will be determined to be liable to the injured customer. BRIEFLY EXPLAIN.
Skip and Jack are the shareholders of the Blue Fish Event Corporation. Skip and Jack regularly put on classy events on or near the beach, so they have a special insurance policy to protect their assets. Business has been slow as fewer large beach weddings are taking place, so Skip and Jack use a large fan to blow down and damage most of their décor assets, some of which were personal assets of Skip and Jack, to collect the insurance benefits. (a) Assuming their acts are proven, will a court allow Skip and Jack to recover the insurance money? (b) Is this a situation where the corporate veil may be pierced? Why or why not? (c) What would it mean for Skip and Jack if the corporate veil is pierced in this situation?
Federal laws such as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and HIPPA, apply to claims handling and to the professional activities of the claims representative. True False
88. when may an agent in Florida write controlled business If writing an amount of similar business equal to or greater than If writing an amount of similar business of at least twice the amount of controlled business If accepting no commissions on the controlled business If not advertising to the general public as an insurance agent
Upon becoming employed by a state-licensed mortgage company, an individual who works for a depository institution as a mortgage loan originator (MLO) shall not be deamed to have tamporary suthority to act as an MLO in an application state if which of the following events has occurred? A) The individual has been a witness in a trial where the defendant was convicted of felony fraud. B) The individual has been subject to a court order for payment of child support. C) The individual had an application for an MLO license denied or an MLO license revoked or suspended in any governmental jurisdiction. D) The individual has submitted an application to be a state-licensed MLO in the application state and was registered in the NMLS as an MLO by the prior omplover
Mona offers Ned, a building inspector, money to overlook the violations in her new warehouse. Ned accepts the money and overlooks the violations. Mona is charged with the crime of bribery. The crime occurred when a. Mona decided to offer the bribe. b. Mona offered the bribe. c. Ned overlooked the violations. d. Ned accepted the bribe.

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

	a.	Brad can successfully recover the necklace from Doris.
	b.	Brad cannot recover from either Doris or Diamonds R Us.
	c.	Brad can sue Diamonds R Us for the value of the necklace but cannot obtain the necklace back from Doris