Before the purchase transaction, Shell had made know to Carbonic Co the purpose and intended use of electrodes. In short, Shell company put their trust and reliance on the skill and expertise of Carbonic Co. So, Shell ordered 60,000 kilograms of welding electrodes from Carbonic Co. for use in a project involving the fabrication of a cross-country gas transmission line. It turned out the electrodes are incapable of producing satisfactory weld in a vertical position. Shell sued Carbonic Co for violation under the Sale of Goods Act. Does Shell action prosper? Please state your reasons.

Before the purchase transaction, Shell had made know to Carbonic Co the purpose and intended use of electrodes. In short, Shell company put their trust and reliance on the skill and expertise of Carbonic Co. So, Shell ordered 60,000 kilograms of welding electrodes from Carbonic Co. for use in a project involving the fabrication of a cross-country gas transmission line. It turned out the electrodes are incapable of producing satisfactory weld in a vertical position. Shell sued Carbonic Co for violation under the Sale of Goods Act. Does Shell action prosper? Please state your reasons.

Similar questions

Live The Dream Ltd provides a limousine and driver hire service. All of the company’s clients sign the company’s standard contract. The contract includes a clause, within the standard terms and conditions, that states: ‘Live The Dream Ltd accepts no liability whatsoever for any financial loss, property damage or personal injury incurred during the hire period’. Leona hired a limousine and driver for her 40th birthday night out. She signed the standard contract which included the standard terms and conditions and paid £500, the full cost of the hire, in advance. When Leona was getting into the limousine at the start of her night out, the vehicle was nudged from behind by a passing car. As a result, the limousine rolled forward and ran over Leona’s foot. Leona’s foot was badly bruised and Leona was in too much pain to continue with her birthday night out. The other vehicle involved drove off, and all subsequent attempts to identify the vehicle and the driver failed. Live The Dream Ltd…
1. Basic Research LLC advertised its products on television networks owned by Rainbow Media Holdings Inc through an ad agency Icebox Advertising Inc. As Basic’s agent Icebox had express authority to buy ads from Rainbow on Basics behalf, but the authority was limited to buying ad with cash in advance. Despite this limit Rainbow sold ads to Basic through Icebox on credit. Basic paid Icebox for the ads, but Icebox did not pass all of the payments on to Rainbow. Icebox filed for bankruptcy. Can Rainbow recoup the unpaid amounts from Basic? Explain.2. Western Fire truck Inc contracted with Emergency One Inc (EO) to be its exclusive dealer in Wyoming and Colorado through Dec. 2003. James Costello, a Western Salesperson, was authorized to order EO vehicles for hi customers. Without informing Western, Costello emailed EO about Westerns diffuclties obtaining cash to fund its operations. He asked about the viability of Westerns contract and his possible employment with EO. On EO’s…
Identify and state the relevant facts in the case: [*1058] In addition, the Agreement authorizes Defendants to establish and fund a reserve account from Schnucks' payment card transactions to offset its indemnity obligations in an amount not to "exceed ... any current and anticipated Association fees or fines." (Bankcard [**6] Addendum at § 22.1) Schnucks alleges that following the data breach, "First Data received a preliminary case management report from MasterCard outlining the case management fee and the amount of monitoring/card replacement and fraud loss reimbursement it was assessing against Citicorp." (Compl. at ¶ 28) Based on the amount of MasterCard's assessment, First Data then projected the total amount of Visa's assessment (id. at ¶ 29), and established the reserve account by withholding a percentage each day from the funds it collected for Schnucks from its payment card transactions. (Id. at ¶¶ 30-31) Schnucks further alleges that Defendants have breached the Agreement…
S insured his appliance store under an owner, landlords, and tenant’s policy that included products liability coverage. While he was demonstrating a microwave oven the door came open and injured a customer. Which of the following would protect S? The oven manufacture’s products liability policy The premises-operation section on S’s policy The products Liability section on S’s policy The incidental contracts section of S’s policy
Daniel, a property developer, is selling a house to Peter, who is 25 years old and intellectually impaired. Houses of an equivalent size and quality in the area generally go for about half the price that Daniel has negotiated with Peter. Peter has paid the deposit and waived the cooling off period under the contract. Peter’s cousin, Jeremy, learns of the deal and is very concerned. Jeremy is Peter’s legal guardian. What can he do legally to help Peter? (Explain how those laws may be interpreted by existing common law and equitable rules and applied to property laws).
A. 1. X, Y, and Z, co-owners, sold a inverter air-condition unit to A. They solidarity bound themselves to deliver the aircon unit in March 30. Through the fault of Y, the aircon unit was completely destroyed . Give the rights and obligations of the parties. B. 1. Joe, Nicolas, and Dante obliged themselves jointly to deliver to Ricky a particular racing horse on April 1. Their agreement which was made known to Ricky is that they will contribute the amount in buying the particular horse. However, the horse was not delivered on the date due because of failure of Nicolas to give his share of the purchase price. State the rights and obligations of the parties. 2. Dindo binds himself to pay his P20,000 loan in four (4) equal monthly installments. Is the obligation of Dindo divisible or indivisible? C. 1. Jaevis promised to deliver to Kyle a breeding cow. Their contract contains a penal clause that in the case of non-fulfillment, Jaevis Shall pay a penalty of P10,000. Jaevis wants to juts…
Accounting Ethics Case: Andy Frame and his supervisor are sent on an out-of-town assignment by their employer. At the supervisor’s suggestion, they stay at the Spartan Inn, across the street from the Luxury Inn. After three days of work, they settle their lodging bills and leave. On the return trip, the supervisor gives Andy what appears to be a copy of a receipt from the Luxury Inn for three nights of lodging. Actually, the supervisor indicates that he prepared the Luxury Inn receipt on his office computer and plans to complete his expense reimbursement request using the higher lodging costs from the Luxury Inn.Required: What are the ethical considerations that Andy faces when he prepares his expense reimbursement request and how often do you think this happens in the real world? Your post should be at least a couple of paragraphs.
Under a Commercial General Liability policy, which of the following actions is an obligation of the insurer? OA. To inspect the insured premises for safety OB. To renew the policy period from the date of loss OC. To pay claims only when there has been a judgment against the insured To pay a daim for which the insured has been found legally responsible OD
In 1961, Ford Motor Company acquired Autolite, a manufacturer of spark plugs, in order to enter the profitable aftermarket for spark plugs sold as replacement parts. Ford and the other major automobile manufacturers had previously purchased original equipment spark plugs (those installed in new cars when they leave the factory) from independent producers such as Autolite and Champion, either at or below the producer’s cost. The independents were willing to sell original equipment plugs so cheaply because aftermarket mechanics often replace original equipment plugs with the same brand of spark plug. GM had already moved into the spark plug market by developing its own division. Ford decided to do so by means of a vertical merger under which it acquired Autolite. Prior to the Autolite acquisition, Ford bought 10 percent of the total spark plug output. The merger left Champion as the only major independent spark plug producer. Champion’s market share thereafter declined because Chrysler…
Murray Osborne designs handbags and attaches his distinctive mark to all of them. He has registered this as a trademark in NSW. He notices that wallets are being sold at the market with the same mark, but they are not his designs. He can see that they are clearly of an inferior quality and is concerned that this will reflect poorly upon his handbags. What rights does Murray have with respect to his trademark? In your answer explain what remedies are available to him and how he should proceed. (Outline legal aspects of personal property law: intellectual property law, patents, copyrights, trademarks, personal property securities law).
A consumer entered into an agreement with Rent-It Corporation for the rental of a television set at a charge of $17 per week. The agreement also provides that if the renter chooses to rent the set for seventy-eight consecutive weeks, title would be transferred. The consumer now contends that the agreement was really a sales agreement, not a lease, and therefore is a credit sale subject to the Truth-in-Lending Act. Explain whether the consumer is correct.
The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has banned Mr Wang Can, a former licensed representative of China Galaxy International Securities (Hong Kong) Co., Limited (CGIS), for 30 months for misconduct (Note 1). The SFC found that Wang asked his friend to open a securities account in September 2014 and conducted personal trading in that account for at least nine months. Wang became privy to information regarding a proposed acquisition of Linmark Group Limited (Linmark) in November 2014 when he assisted CGIS to prepare pre-engagement documentation for a potential client. He went on to purchase shares of Linmark through his friend's account and sold them two days after Linmark announced the proposed acquisition on 3 December 2014 and made a profit of $7,800 (Note 2). Wang breached CGIS' staff dealing policy by failing to disclose to his then employer his personal trading activities and beneficial interests in his friend's account. He also breached CGIS's staff dealing policy in that…