Before the furniture store began its ad campaign, it averaged 170 customers per day. The manager is investigating if the average is larger since the ad came out. The data for the 15 randomly selected days since the ad campaign began is shown below: 183, 188, 187, 153, 194, 174, 167, 199, 162, 165, 200, 155, 178, 163, 183 Assuming that the distribution is normal, what can be concluded at the αα = 0.01 level of significance? A. For this study, we should use Select an answer t-test for a population mean z-test for a population proportion B. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: H0:H0: ? p μ Select an answer > = < ≠ H1:H1: ? μ p Select an answer > ≠ < = C. The test statistic ? z t = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) D. The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) e. The p-value is ? ≤ > αα F. Based on this, we should accept, reject, or fail to reject the null hypothesis. G. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The data suggest that the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is not significantly more than 170 at αα = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is more than 170. The data suggest the populaton mean is significantly more than 170 at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is more than 170. The data suggest the population mean is not significantly more than 170 at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is equal to 170. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. There is a 5.6467421% chance of a Type I error. There is a 5.6467421% chance that the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is greater than 170. If the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is 170 and if you collect data for another 15 days since the ad campaign began then there would be a 5.6467421% chance that the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began would be greater than 170. If the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is 170 and if you collect data for another 15 days since the ad campaign began then there would be a 5.6467421% chance that the sample mean for these 15 days would be greater than 176.7. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study. There is a 1% chance that the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is more than 170. If the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is 170 and if you collect data for another 15 days since the ad campaign began, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is more than 170. There is a 1% chance that there will be no customers since everyone shops online nowadays. If the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is more than 170 and if you collect data for another 15 days since the ad campaign began, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign is equal to 170.
Before the furniture store began its ad campaign, it averaged 170 customers per day. The manager is investigating if the average is larger since the ad came out. The data for the 15 randomly selected days since the ad campaign began is shown below:
183, 188, 187, 153, 194, 174, 167, 199, 162, 165, 200, 155, 178, 163, 183
Assuming that the distribution is normal, what can be concluded at the αα = 0.01 level of significance?
A. For this study, we should use Select an answer t-test for a population
B. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
H0:H0: ? p μ Select an answer > = < ≠
H1:H1: ? μ p Select an answer > ≠ < =
C. The test statistic ? z t = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
D. The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
e. The p-value is ? ≤ > αα
F. Based on this, we should accept, reject, or fail to reject the null hypothesis.
G. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
- The data suggest that the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is not significantly more than 170 at αα = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is more than 170.
- The data suggest the populaton mean is significantly more than 170 at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is more than 170.
- The data suggest the population mean is not significantly more than 170 at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is equal to 170.
- Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.
- There is a 5.6467421% chance of a Type I error.
- There is a 5.6467421% chance that the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is greater than 170.
- If the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is 170 and if you collect data for another 15 days since the ad campaign began then there would be a 5.6467421% chance that the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began would be greater than 170.
- If the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is 170 and if you collect data for another 15 days since the ad campaign began then there would be a 5.6467421% chance that the sample mean for these 15 days would be greater than 176.7.
- Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.
- There is a 1% chance that the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is more than 170.
- If the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is 170 and if you collect data for another 15 days since the ad campaign began, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is more than 170.
- There is a 1% chance that there will be no customers since everyone shops online nowadays.
- If the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign began is more than 170 and if you collect data for another 15 days since the ad campaign began, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the population mean number of customers since the ad campaign is equal to 170.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 5 images