(b) Two hotels, Hotel Sandy and Hotel Magda, are competing for a limited number of tourists. The hotels have approval to either expand hotel operations, or add recreational water sports to their offerings. No one hotel has approval do both of these changes. A research company has determined that the following outcomes are likely: If Hotel Sandy expands, and Hotel Magda adds water sports, Hotel Sandy will increase its market share by 1%, and Hotel Magda will increase its market share by 3%. If Hotel Sandy adds water sports, and Hotel Magda expands, Hotel Sandy will decrease its market share by 5%, and Hotel Magda will increase its market share by 2%. If both hotels add water sports, Hotel Sandy will increase its market share by 4%, and Hotel Magda will increase its market share by 5%. If both hotels expand, Hotel Sandy will increase its market share by 2%, and Hotel Magda will decrease its market share by 5%. Given that both hotels employ game theory, what course of action would each hotel take?

(b) Two hotels, Hotel Sandy and Hotel Magda, are competing for a limited number of tourists. The hotels have approval to either expand hotel operations, or add recreational water sports to their offerings. No one hotel has approval do both of these changes. A research company has determined that the following outcomes are likely: If Hotel Sandy expands, and Hotel Magda adds water sports, Hotel Sandy will increase its market share by 1%, and Hotel Magda will increase its market share by 3%. If Hotel Sandy adds water sports, and Hotel Magda expands, Hotel Sandy will decrease its market share by 5%, and Hotel Magda will increase its market share by 2%. If both hotels add water sports, Hotel Sandy will increase its market share by 4%, and Hotel Magda will increase its market share by 5%. If both hotels expand, Hotel Sandy will increase its market share by 2%, and Hotel Magda will decrease its market share by 5%. Given that both hotels employ game theory, what course of action would each hotel take?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Two technology companies, Bapple and Hoogle, are interested in attracting more software engineers to work and are considering introducing a personal shopper for employees as a new perk. The following game depicts the strategic outcomes that result from the game. Increases in annual profits of the two growing technology companies are shown in the table below. Bapple Offer the new perk Do not offer the new perk A $80 million B $10 million C Hoogle $60 million D $30 million Offer the new perk Hoogle = $20 million Bapple = $30 million Hoogle = $60 million Bapple = $10 million Refer to the Table. If both companies follow a dominant strategy, Bapple's annual profit will grow by Use letters in alphabetical order to select options Do not offer the new perk Hoogle = $5 million Bapple = $80 million Hoogle = $40 million Bapple = $60 million
Three firms share a market. The demand function is P(q1, 92, 93) = 10 – q1 – 92 – 93, where q; is the output of firm i, Player i. The marginal cost per unit for each firm is zero. Suppose firm 1 is a market leader, and that firm 2, and firm 3 choose q2 and q3 simultaneously after observing q1 Find the SPE of this game. How much is produced by firm 2? Numerical answer How much is produced by firm 1, 2, and 3?
Refer to the images 'Facebook versus Google Plus'. And answer the question below Why did Google Plus fail as a social networking site?
Space 1 options: less than or equal to, equal to, greater than or equal to Space 2 options: 0 0.5 1 8 16
(a) Assuming that each fishery chooses fi ∈ (0, F), to maximize its payoff function, derive the players’ best response functions and find a Nash equilibrium. (b) Is the equilibrium you found in (a) unique or not? What are equilibrium payoffs? 4 (c) Suppose that a benevolent social planner wants maximize the utility of both fisheries. In other words, the social planner solves the following problem: max w(f1,f2) w(f1, f2) = u1(f1, f2) + u2(f1, f2) =2 ln(f1) + 2 ln(f2) + 2 ln(F − f1 − f2). Find the social planner’s solution. (d) What are the fisheries’ payoffs if the quantities of fish they catch are solutions to the social planner’s problem? What can you say about the Nash equilibrium quantities of fish being caught as compared to the social planner’s solution? (e) If fishery j decides to follow the recommendation of the social planner, how much fish will firm i catch?
a) The presence of network effects implies: (i) Higher barriers to exit for users, and higher barriers to entry for new competitors (ii)Higher margins in at least one market (iii)Tipping toward winner-take-all markets (iv) (i), (ii) and (iii) (v) (i) and (iii) only
(J)
Consider a game where a potential market Entrant is trying to decide whether or not to enter the market. An Incumbent monopolist is established and can choose to cut the price, maintain the price, or raise the price in hopes of deterring the Entrant from entering. Incumbent Entrant Enter Stay Out Cut Price -4,4 0,9 Maintain Price 4,6 0,12 Raise Price 5,5 0, 13 a) Suppose the Entrant and the Incumbent make their decisions simultaneously. Is there a pure strategy Nash equilibrium? If so, what is it? b) Suppose the players move sequentially, and that the Entrant moves first. Set up the game tree and solve for the equilibrium path. Can the Incumbent deter entry? Explain. c) Now suppose that the Incumbent moves first. Again, set up the game tree. What is the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium outcome now? Can the Incumbent deter entry now?
All problems below include an “unknown” parameter A, which is 1.5. Suppose that 2 firms are competing in a heterogeneous market whereby the demand functions of firm 1 and firm 2 are given by q1 = A − 3p1 + 2p2 and q2 = A − 3p2 + 2p1. Both firms have a marginal cost equal to 1. (a) [10] Calculate the optimal profits for the two firms when they compete in prices. (b) [20] If firm 1 spends an amount F to reduce its marginal cost to 0, what is the maximum value of F that it would be willing to pay? For the rest of the problem, suppose, instead, that firm 1 sets the quantity (q1) while simultaneously firm 2 sets the price (p2). (c) [15] Draw the two best response functions in a graph and indicate the Nash equilibrium. Be as detailed as possible in giving intuition. (Note: the graphs will be in the (p2, q1) space, but remember that you are not drawing any demand curves.) (d) [25] Compute both of the firms’ equilibrium prices, quantities, and profits. Which firm makes a higher profit?…
Suppose the market for a certain good is controlled by a single firm I (incumbent). Now, a second firm C (challenger) considers entering the market. In case of no entrance (ne), profits are TC = 0 and TI = 50 , respectively. In case of entry (e), firm I can either retaliate (r) which induces losses for both firms TC = T] = -10, or not retaliate (nr) which induces profits of TC respectively. 10 and TI = 20 (a) Depict this game in extensive form. (b) Find an equilibrium by backward induction. (c) Find all other equilibria (in pure and mixed strategies).
I am struggling with this question for a Game Theory course. It would be great to have a visual breakdown of how to solve it so that I understand what to do for the rest of the problems.
Two rival companies competing in the same market need to decide their plans for future expansion of their stores. The Table below shows the possible outcomes of their mutually interdependent actions (payoffs are profits in £m) Giga Company Titanic Conglomerate No Change Refurbishment of existing stores Large Expansion No Change 30, 40 25, 35 15, 24 Refurbishment of existing stores 35, 30 28, 32 18, 33 Large Expansion 12, 22 18, 20 20, 25 The Nash equilibrium: (A) does not exist. (B) occurs when both firms choose Refurbishment of existing stores. (C) occurs when both firms choose Large Expansion. (D) occurs when both firms choose No Change.