Assume we have a market with only two companies in it, Company X and Company Y. Now suppose that both companies have to choose one of two potential strategies for pricing their products: setting a low price or setting a high price. The table below shows the expected profits for each company under each pricing scenario. Assume both companies are in competition with each other and seek to maximize their profits. Under these conditions, how much profit should we expect both companies to earn?

Assume we have a market with only two companies in it, Company X and Company Y. Now suppose that both companies have to choose one of two potential strategies for pricing their products: setting a low price or setting a high price. The table below shows the expected profits for each company under each pricing scenario. Assume both companies are in competition with each other and seek to maximize their profits. Under these conditions, how much profit should we expect both companies to earn?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Question 3:Suppose the inverse demand for a good is given by P = 50 – 4Q, where Q is the totalquantity supplied by all firms in the market. Suppose each firm in the market has a constantmarginal cost of 18.Q3 a) Assume the market consists of two firms that set their quantities simultaneously.Calculate the duopoly levels of production and the equilibrium price. Q3 b) Now assume firm 1 chooses its production level before firm 2 does. What will be theequilibrium quantities, price and profits in this case?Q3 c) Now instead suppose that the two firms compete over prices rather than quantities.What will be the equilibrium price and profits of firms 1 and 2 in this case? Finally, if firm 1manages to lower its marginal cost to 14, what will be the new equilibrium price, quantitiesand profits?
Consider two oligopolists, each choosing between a “high” and a “low” level of production. Given their choices of how much to produce, their profits will be as follows: Explain how firm B will reason that it makes sense to produce the high amount, regardless of what firm A chooses. Then explain how firm A will reason that it makes sense to produce the high amount, regardless of what firm B chooses. How might collusion assist the two firms in this case?
Can you show me the answer of question c and d? Thank you so much for your help
Two firms compete on price every year. The inverse demand function each firm faces depends on which firm has chosen the lowest price that year. The one that did captures the entire market. If, on the other hand, both prices are the same then they split the market evenly. Consumers round up prices to the nearest integer. For the firm with the lowest price p, demand is given by: q = 24-2p: Marginal costs are constant and equal to $4 for both firms. a. Define the Normal form of the stage game and determine the Nash Equilibria, the Cooperative Equilibrium and the Optimal Deviation from cooperation. b. For the once repeated (2 stages) game, determine if a Nash Equilibrium exists that improves on simply playing the (better) Nash Equilibrium of the stage game twice c. For the infinitely repeated game, determine what the interest rate would have to be to prevent the firms from cooperating. d*. Determine the relation between the interest rate and the number of punishment periods in a…
The payoff matrix presents the profits for Firms X and Y under their two individual pricing strategies. Suppose both firms have agreed to maximize their combined profits by colluding on their pricing strategies. Use the information in this payoff matrix to answer the two questions. Firm Y strategy Low price 18 High price $ 16 Firm X strategy Low price Firm X Profit = 71 Firm Y Profit 71 Firm X Profit = 105 Firm Y Profit = 49 = Compare the profits of Firm X when both firms respect the collusive agreement to the profits of Firm X when Firm X secretly cheats on the agreement. How much additional profit would Firm X earn by secretly cheating on the agreement to collude? Round your answer to the nearest whole number. High price Firm X Profit = 49 Firm Y Profit = 105 Firm X Profit = 87 Firm Y Profit = 87 Compare the profits of Firm Y when both firms respect the collusive agreement to the profits of Firm Y when both firms cheat on the agreement. By how much would the profits of Firm Y fall if…
Suppose Giocattolo of Italy and American Toy Company of the United States are the only two firms producing toys for sale in the U.S. market. Each firm realizes constant long-term costs so that the average total cost (ATC) equals the marginal cost (MC) at each level of output. Thus, MCo = ATCO is the long-term market supply schedule for toys. Suppose Giocattolo and American Toy Company operate as competitors, and the cost schedules of each company are MCo = ATCO = $10. On the following graph, use the grey point (star symbol) to identify the competitive market equilibrium. Then, use the green triangle (triangle symbols) to identify consumer surplus in this case. Note: Select and drag the point from the palette to the graph. Dashed drop lines will automatically extend to both axes. Then select and drag the shaded region from the palette to the graph. To resize the shaded region, select one of the points and move to the desired position. ? PRICE (Dollars per toy) 20 18 16 14 10 00 6 4 2 0…
2. Four firms (A, B, C, and D) play a pricing game (i.e. Bertrand). Each firm (i) may choose any price Pi from 0 to ¥, with the goal of maximizing its own profit. Firms A and B have MC = 10, while firms C and D have MC = 20. The firms serve a market with the demand curve Q = 100 – P. All firms produce exactly the same product, so consumers purchase only from the firm with the lowest price. If multiple firms have the same low price, consumers divide their quantities evenly among the low-priced firms. Assume the firms choose price simultaneously. a. There are many equilibria in this simultaneous-move pricing game. Provide one equilibrium combination of prices, and argue that no firm has a unilateral incentive to deviate from these prices. Now assume firm A chooses price first. Firm B observes this choice and then chooses its own price second. Firm C chooses price third, and firm D chooses price last. b. Again, there are many equilibria in this sequential-move pricing game.…
Two firms, Incumbent & Entrant, can produce the same good. The market demand for the good is given by P = 180 – Q, where P is the market price and Q is the market quantity demanded. The firms must pay w = 45 per unit of output for labour and r = 45 per unit of output for capital (one unit of capital is used per unit of output), but Incumbent may choose capacity KI units of capital before Entrant decides whether to enter the market. Suppose firms each have fixed costs FI =600, FE=500. Incumbent chooses (as a Stackelberg leader) capacity KI equal to the monopoly profit- maximizing quantity. When you answer the following questions, show your work. a. Would Incumbent be able to prevent entry by choosing capacity KI equal to the monopoly profit-maximizing quantity? Explain. b. What is the Incumbent’s equilibrium choice of capacity KI in this Dixit game? c. Does the Incumbent’s choice of capacity KI in part (b) qualify as predatory conduct (here, limit output)? Explain.
The marginal cost of a product is fixed at MC = 20. The demand for the product is Q = 100 - 2P. (a) Now consider a Cournot model with two firms that are choosing quantities simultaneously. What is the best reply (best response) function for each firm? What is theNash equilibrium? What is the total surplus? (b)What do you expect the total surplus would be with three firms? Why? (You do not need to calculate an exact value. You can say ”total surplus is at least 100”, or ”total surplus is at most 80”)
In the Cournot equilibrium, how much profit does firm 1 and firm 2 make in profit? (Round off to at least 2 decimal places, use negative numbers for losses.)
Problem 3. Firm 1, Firm 2 and Firm 3 are the only competitors in a market for a good. The price in the market is given by the inverse demand equation P=10 (Q1+Q2+Q3) where Q, is the output of Firm i (i=1,2,3). Firm 1's total cost function is C₁ = 4Q₁+1, Firm 2's total cost function is C₂ = 2Q2 +3, and Firm 3's total cost function is C3 = 3Q3 + 2. Each firm wants to maximize its profits and they simultaneously choose their quantities. Determine a Nash equilibrium in this market.
An industry consists of two firms, firm 1 and firm 2. The demand function for the product of each firmsis given by q1 = 720 - 3p1 + 2p2 and q2 = 720 - 3p2 + 2p1. We assume for simplicity that the totalcost of production is zero:TC1 =TC2 =0. a) Are these two products substitutes or complements? Assuming that firms compete over prices, find theprice best-response functions for firm 1 and fin 2. Draw a diagram that shows the BRFs and theequilibrium. Are prices strategic substitutes or complements? Find the Bertrand Nash equilibrium inprices and outputs. Obtain the profits of each firm. b) Show that the duopolists have incentives to collude. Find their joint profit-maximizing price, output, andprofit: find each firm's price. output and protit. Is collusion a Nash equilibrium? If not, what is the optimaldefection for each firm? Show this game in a 2X2 matrix form. What does this imply about the Nashequilibrium or the stability of their collusive agreement? Is it a Prisoner's Dilemma…