Assume that the world economy is composed of only two countries (Canada and the United States) and only two goods (steel andwheat). The table below reports the units of steel or wheat per unit of labor in Canada and in the United StatesSteel perWheat perunit of laborunit of laborCanadaUnited States9.3Suppose both the US and Canada have 10 units of labor. Use the joint PPF to answer the following: If the two countries areproducing 25 units of wheat, what is the opportunity cost of wheat? Hint: draw the PPF and ask what is the slope when 25 units arebeing produced?2.52.753

When Canada and the US have 1 unit of labor they can produce 9 and 5 units of steel respectively or…

Answered: Assume that the world economy is…

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Below are hypothetical production possibilities tables for New Zealand and Spain. Each country can produce apples and plums. Referring to the tables, answer the following: Suppose the optimal product mixes before specialization and trade are alternative B in New Zealand and alternative S in Spain and the actual terms of trade are 1 plum for 2 apples. What will be the gains from specialization and trade?
Suppose that France and Italy both produce wine and cheese. France's opportunity cost of producing a case of cheese is 5 barrels of wine, while Italy's opportunity cost of producing a case of cheese is 10 barrels of wine. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing cheese in the two countries, you can tell that comparative advantage in the production of cheese and has a comparative advantage in the production of wine. Suppose that France and Italy consider trading cheese and wine. France can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than of wine for each case of cheese it exports to Italy. Similarly, Italy can gain from trade as long as it receives of cheese for each barrel of wine it exports to France. more than Based on your answer to the last question, a price ratio between benefit both countries. has a barrels of wine per case of cheese will
Happyland can produce 40 tones of marshmallows or 20 tones of chocolate in a year. Friendshipland can produce 80 tones of marshmallows or 40 tones of chocolate in a year. Can these countries benefit from trade with each other based on specialization and comparative advantage? Yes No
Say that Alland can produce 32 units of food per person per year or 16 units of clothing per person per year, but Georgeland can produce 16 units of food per year or 8 units of clothing. Which of the following is true? Question 35 options: Georgeland has a comparative advantage, but not an absolute advantage, in producing clothing. Georgeland has both a comparative and absolute advantage in producing clothing. Alland has a comparative advantage, but not an absolute advantage, in producing food. Alland has an absolute advantage, but not comparative advantage, in producing food.
The table below for the United States and Mexico shows maximum feasible production rates per acre of wheat if no rice is produced and maximum feasible production rates per acre of rice if no wheat are produced. Assume that the opportunity costs of producing these goods are constant in both countries. Output per Acre with Trade Wheat 80 tons United States Mexico 55 tons For the United States, the opportunity cost of 1 ton of wheat is tons of rice. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) has a comparative advantage in wheat, and has a comparative advantage in rice. Now consider the following table that shows the production and consumption of wheat and rice if there is no trade. Output per Acre with No Trade Wheat 40.0 tons 27.5 tons United States Mexico Total output of wheat if the two countries do not trade tons. (Enter your response rounded to one decimal place.) Total output of rice if the two countries do not trade tons. (Enter your response rounded to one decimal place)…
Assume that Bangladesh can make 100 square yards of textiles (T) OR 20 computer chips (CC) per day, while Taiwanese worker can make 60 square yards of textiles (T) OR 90 computer chips (CC) per day. Assume that: at of 1) in autarky, each country produced at the midpoint of their PPCS uestion 2) each country completely specializes in the appropriate product 3) 40 square yards of T are exchanged for 40 units of CC. What are their gains from trade? Select one: O a. Bangladesh 10 T and 30 CC: Taiwan 10 Tand 5 C. O b. None of the answers offered are correct. O C. Bangladesh 40 T ahd 60 CC Taiwan 50 T and 40 C. O d. Bangladesh 0 T and 30 CC Taiwan 20 Tand 0 C. Oe. Bangladesh 10 T and 10 CC Taiwan 15 Tand 15 C
4.3 Suppose that Britain can produce 10 units of cloth or 5 units of food per day (or any linear combination) with available resources and that Greece can produce 2 units of food per day or 1 unit of cloth (or any combination). Britain has an absolute advantage over Greece in producing both goods. Does it still make sense for these countries to trade? Explain.
When a country specializes in the production of a good, this means that it can produce this good at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partner. Because of this comparative advantage, both countries benefit when they specialize and trade with each other. The following graphs show the production possibilities frontiers (PPFS) for Maldonia and Lamponia. Both countries produce lemons and sugar, each initially (i.e., before specialization and trade) producing 24 million pounds of lemons and 12 million pounds of sugar, as indicated by the grey stars marked with the letter A. (? (?) Maldonia Lamponia 64 64 56 56 48 PPF 48 40 40 32 32 24 24 PPF 16 16 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 LEMONS (Millions of pounds) LEMONS (Millions of pounds) Maldonia has a comparative advantage in the production of production of while Lamponia has a comparative advantage in the . Suppose that Maldonia and Lamponia specialize in the production of the goods in which each has a comparative advantage.…
On the same graph, draw two PPFs: one for Arizona and one for North Dakota. Assume Arizona can produce 80 bales of hay or 20 pounds of sunflowers. North Dakota can produce 30 bales of hay or 120 pounds of sunflowers. For both states, points in between these limits are possible. Show how the total production of hay and sunflowers is greater with specialization than with self-sufficiency. Assume that the states trade 20 bales of hay for 30 pounds of sunflowers. Demonstrate the gains from trade with points on your graph. 1. Explain the opportunity costs of producing 1 bale of hay and 1 pound of sunflowers for each state. 2. Draw your own PPF graph on a piece of paper. 3. Clearly label all axes and lines. Include all relevant information.
Suppose that Croatia and Wales both produce beets and wheat. Croatia's opportunity cost of producing a bushel of wheat is 4 bushels of beets while Wales's opportunity cost of producing a bushel of wheat is 11 bushels of beets. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing wheat in the two countries, you can tell that production of wheat and has a comparative advantage in the production of beets. Suppose that Croatia and Wales consider trading wheat and beets with each other. Croatia can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than ▼ of beets for each bushel of wheat it exports to Wales. Similarly, Wales can gain from trade as long as it receives more of wheat for each bushel of beets it exports to Croatia. than has a comparative advantage in the Based on your answer to the last question, which of the following prices of trade (that is, price of wheat in terms of beets) would allow both Wales and Croatia to gain from trade? Check all that apply. ☐ 6 bushels of…

Recommended textbooks for you

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Economics

ISBN:

9780190931919

Author:

NEWNAN

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Principles of Economics (12th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134078779

Author:

Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster

Publisher:

PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134870069

Author:

William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling

Publisher:

PEARSON

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Economics

ISBN:

9780190931919

Author:

NEWNAN

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Principles of Economics (12th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134078779

Author:

Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster

Publisher:

PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134870069

Author:

William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling

Publisher:

PEARSON

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)

Economics

ISBN:

9781305585126

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

Economics

ISBN:

9781337106665

Author:

Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…

Economics

ISBN:

9781259290619

Author:

Michael Baye, Jeff Prince

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS