Assume that the countries of Irun and Urun are the only two producers of crude oil. Further assume that both countries have entered into an agreement to maintain certain production levels in order to maximize profits. In the world market for oil, the demand curve is downward sloping. Refer to Scenario 16-1. The fact that both countries have colluded to earn higher profit shows their desire to keep production levels above the monopoly level of output. below the Nash equilibrium level of output. equal to the Nash equilibrium level of output above the Nash equilibrium level of output.

Assume that the countries of Irun and Urun are the only two producers of crude oil. Further assume that both countries have entered into an agreement to maintain certain production levels in order to maximize profits. In the world market for oil, the demand curve is downward sloping. Refer to Scenario 16-1. The fact that both countries have colluded to earn higher profit shows their desire to keep production levels above the monopoly level of output. below the Nash equilibrium level of output. equal to the Nash equilibrium level of output above the Nash equilibrium level of output.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter15: Imperfect Competition

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 15.1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider trade relations between the United States and Mexico. Assume that the leaders of the two countries believe the payoffs to alternative trade policies are as follows a. What is the dominant strategy for the United States? For Mexico? Explain. b. Define Nash equilibrium. What is the Nash equilibrium for trade policy? c. In 1993, the U.S.Congress ratified the North American Free Trade Agreement, in which the United States and Mexico agreed to reduce trade barriers simultaneously. Do the perceived payoffs shown here justify this approach to trade policy? Explain. d. Based on your understanding of the gains from trade (discussed in Chapters 3 and 9), do you think that these payoffs actually reflect a nation's welfare under the four possible outcomes?
Give a discussion from the economies of scale perspective on the statement “trade need not be the result of comparative advantage”. And derive the relationship between the number of firms (n) and the price each firm charges (P) for the model of monopolistic competition. [Hint: P = c + 1/ (b * n); c is the marginal cost; b is a positive constant term representing the responsiveness of a firm’s sales to its prices]
the set of Fationalizable strategies will be the same for party R.) Explain your reasoning. ve Intel and AMD, the primary producers of computer central processing units (CPUS), compete with one another in the mid-range chip category (among other categories). Assume that global demand for mid-range chips depends on the quantity that the two firms make, so that the price (in dollars) for mid-range chips is given by P = 210 – Q, where Q = qin- || GAMD and where the quantities are measured in millions. Each mid- + 9AMD tel range chip costs Intel $60 to produce. AMD's production process is more streamlined; each chip costs them only $48 to produce. (a) Write the profit function for each firm in terms of qintel and qAMD- Find each firm's best-response rule. (b) Find the Nash equilibrium price, quantity, and profit for each firm. (c) (Optional) Suppose Intel acquires AMD, so that it now has two sep- arate divisions with two different production costs. The merged firm wishes to maximize total…
AT&T and Verizon have two pricing strategies: Set a high (monopoly) price or set a low (competitive) price. Suppose that if they both set a competitive price, economic profit for both is zero. If both set a monopoly price, AT&T makes an economic profit of $100 million and Verizon makes an economic profit of $200 million. If AT&T sets a low price and Verizon sets a high price, AT&T makes an economic profit of $200 mil- lion and Verizon incurs an economic loss of $100 million; if AT&T sets a high price and Verizon sets a low price, AT&T incurs an economic loss of $50 million and Verizon makes an economic profit of $250 million. Create the payoff matrix for this game. What is the equilibrium of this game? Is the equilibrium efficient?
mether to produce a low output or a high output. nese output strategies with corresponding profits are depicted in the ayoff matrix to the right. Kuwait's profits are in red and Saudi Arabia's are in blue. Suppose the two countries form a cartel. What is the cooperative equilibrium? Kuwait O A. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high output and Kuwait to produce a high output. Low Output High Output O B. A cooperative equilibrium does not exist for this game. $125 $75 Low Output O C. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a low output and Kuwait to produce a high output. $8 $13 Saudi Arabia O D. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high output and Kuwait to produce a low output. $98 $70 E. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to broduce a low output and Kuwait to produce a low output. High Output What is the Nash equilibrium for this game? O A. The Nash equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high…
Table 18-14 Suppose that two oil companies-BP and Exxon-own adjacent natural gas fields. The profits that each firm earus depends on both the member of wells it drills and the number of wells drilled by the other firm. The table below lists each firm's individual profits: Exxon Drill one well Drill two wells BP Drill one well BP Drill two wells Exxon's profit $10 million BP's profit $10 million Exxon's profit $6 million BP's profit $12 million Exxon's profit $12 million BP's profit $6 million Exxon's profit $8 million. BP's profit $8 million Refer to Table 18-14. Does BP have a dominant strategy? If so, describe it. For the toolbar, press ALT+F10 (PC) or ALT+FN+F10 (Mac) BIUS Paragraph Arial 5 田田田园 10pt 89. M XX, 833 >>() ⒸO HE [+ V A AV ✓ Z X T 94 ΩΘΙ *** 68.88
Melanie and Oli are competing Pacific halibut fishers. Both have been allocated ITQs that limit their catch to 1,000 tons of Pacific halibut each. Melanie's cost per ton is $20; Oli's cost per ton is $28.Refer to the information given and assume that the market price of Pacific halibut is $40 per ton. If Melanie pays Oli $10 per ton for his ITQs and then catches her new limit of 2,000 tons, their combined profit would be: $28,000. $32,000. $40,000. $54,000.
In the domestic airline market, where companies compete on the number of seats they make available in the market measured in millions (x), the inverse of the demand for seats is pd(x) = 40 - 4x.Assume that there are 2 airlines: LON and Pacific Airlines. The marginal cost per seat of both airlines is 10:(a) Determine the market equilibrium (quantity produced by each firm, market price and profits). Graph(b) Assume that LON and Aerolineas del Pacifico collude and act as a monopoly. Calculate the number of seats (x) and the selling price.(c) What is the efficient number of seats that should be made available to consumers, and at what price would each seat be sold?
consider the market for oil. Suppose for simplicity that there are only two oil roducing countries-Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Both countries must choose hether to produce a low output or a high output. These output strategies with corresponding profits are depicted in the ayoff matrix to the right. Kuwait's profits are in red and Saudi Arabia's are in blue. Kuwait Suppose the two countries form a cartel. What is the cooperative equilibrium? Low Output High Output O A. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high output and Kuwait to produce a high output. $125 $75 Low Output $8 $13 O B. A cooperative equilibrium does not exist for this game. O C. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a low output and Kuwait to produce a high output. Saudi Arabia $98 $70 O D. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high output and Kuwait to produce a low output. High Output $5 $8 O E. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce…
Melanie and Oli are competing Pacific halibut fishers. Both have been allocated ITQs that limit their catch to 1,000 tons of Pacific halibut each. Melanie's cost per ton is $20; Oli's cost per ton is $25. Assume that the market price of Pacific halibut is $35 per ton. If Melanie pays Oli $11 per ton for his ITQs and then catches her new limit of 2,000 tons, her profit would be Multiple Choice $39,000. $19,000. $25,000. $15,000.
Consider a "Betrand price competition model" between two profit maximizing widget producers say A and B. The marginal cost of producing a widget is 4 for each producer. Each widget producer has a capacity constraint to produce only 5 widgets. There are 8 identical individuals who demand 1 widget only, and individuals value each widget at 6. If the firms are maximizing profits, then which of the following statement is true: a) Firm A and Firm B will charge 4 b) Firm A and Firm B will charge 6 c) Firm A and Firm B will charge greater than or equal to 5 d) None of the options are correct. Explain clearly.
Imagine a small town in a remote area where only two residents, Maria and Miguel, own dairies that produce milk that is safe to drink. Each week Maria and Miguel work together to decide how many gallons of milk to produce. They bring milk to town and sell it at whatever price the market will bear. To keep things simple, suppose that Maria and Miguel can produce as much milk as they want without cost so that the marginal cost is zero. The weekly town demand schedule and total revenue schedule for milk is shown in the table below: Quantity (in gallons) 10 |1 O b. $12 O c. $10 d. S8 2 113 14 לן 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 Price $24 $22 $20 $18 $16 $14 $12 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 $0 Total Revenue (and Total Profit) $0 $22 $40 $54 $64 $70 $72 $70 $64 $54 $40 $22 $0 Refer to Table 17-3. Suppose the town enacts new antitrust laws that prohibit Maria and Miguel from operating as a monopoly. What will be the price of milk once Maria and Miguel reach a Nash equilibrium? a. $14