According to an article in Science Daily,† women who are having difficulty becoming pregnant sometimes use human growth hormone (HGH) in addition to in-vitro fertilization (IVF) to try to have a baby. A large study found that "there was no strong evidence" that the proportion of women who became pregnant while taking HGH along with IVF was greater than the success rate for IVF alone. Messages ll LTE10:04 PMO 56%A webassign.net5. [-/3 Рoints]DETAILSPECKSTAT2 10.E.005.MY NOTESAccording to an article in Science Daily,t women who are having difficultybecoming pregnant sometimes use human growth hormone (HGH) inaddition to in-vitro fertilization (IVF) to try to have a baby. A large studyfound that "there was no strong evidence" that the proportion of women whobecame pregnant while taking HGH along with IVF was greater than thesuccess rate for IVF alone.(a) Is this consistent with testingHo: HGH in addition to IVF increases the chance of getting pregnantversusH,: HGH in addition to IVF does not increase the chance of gettingpregnantor with testingHo:HGH in addition to IVF does not increase the chance of gettingpregnantversusH.: HGH in addition to IVF increases the chance of getting pregnant?Ho:: HGH in addition to IVF increases the chance of getting pregnantversusH3: HGH in addition to IVF does not increase the chance of gettingpregnantHo:: HGH in addition to IVF does not increase the chance of gettingpregnant versusH2: HGH in addition to IVF increases the chance of gettingpregnantExplain.The null hypothesis is considered a statement of difference, or non-equality. In this case, HGH in addition to IVF does increase thechance of getting pregnant.The null hypothesis is considered a statement of difference, or non-equality. In this case, HGH in addition to IVF doesn't decrease thechance of getting pregnant.The null hypothesis is considered a statement of no difference, orequality. In this case, HGH in addition to IVF does increase thechance of getting pregnant.The null hypothesis is considered a statement of difference, or non-equality. In this case, HGH in addition to IVF doesn't increase thechance of getting pregnant.The null hypothesis is considered a statement of no difference, orequality. In this case, HGH in addition to IVF doesn't increase thechance of getting pregnant.(b) Does the stated conclusion of "no strong evidence" indicate that the nullhypothesis was rejected? Explain.Yes. The statement of "no strong evidence" is referring to no strongevidence in support of the alternative hypothesis. Therefore, the nullhypothesis was rejected. .ll Metro by T-Mobile LTE10:04 PMO 56%webassign.netversusH2: HGH in addition to IVF does not increase the chance of gettingpregnantHo: HGH in addition to IVF does not increase the chance of gettingpregnant versusHa:: HGH in addition to IVF increases the chance of gettingpregnantExplain.The null hypothesis is considered a statement of difference, or non-equality. In this case, HGH in addition to IVF does increase thechance of getting pregnant.O The null hypothesis is considered a statement of difference, or non-equality. In this case, HGH in addition to IVF doesn't decrease thechance of getting pregnant.The null hypothesis is considered a statement of no difference, orequality. In this case, HGH in addition to IVF does increase thechance of getting pregnant.The null hypothesis is considered a statement of difference, or non-equality. In this case, HGH in addition to IVF doesn't increase thechance of getting pregnant.The null hypothesis is considered a statement of no difference, orequality. In this case, HGH in addition to IVF doesn't increase thechance of getting pregnant.(b) Does the stated conclusion of "no strong evidence" indicate that the nullhypothesis was rejected? Explain.Yes. The statement of "no strong evidence" is referring to no strongevidence in support of the alternative hypothesis. Therefore, the nullhypothesis was rejected.Yes. The statement of "no strong evidence" is referring to no strongevidence in support of the null hypothesis. Therefore, the nullhypothesis was rejected.No. The statement of "no strong evidence" is referring to no strongevidence in support of the null hypothesis. Therefore, the nullhypothesis was not rejected.No. The statement of "no strong evidence" is referring to no strongevidence in support of the null hypothesis. Therefore, the alternativehypothesis is accepted.No. The statement of "no strong evidence" is referring to no strongevidence in support of the alternative hypothesis. Therefore, the nullhypothesis was not rejected.Submit Answer6. [-/2 Points]DETAILSРЕCKSTAT2 10.E.006.MY NOTESIn a hypothesis test, what does it mean to say that the null hypothesis wasrejected?Rejecting the null hypothesis means that the sample data provide convincingevidence against the -Select--hypothesis and in favor of the---Select---

Name: According to an article in Science Daily,† women who are having diffic
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:00.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: According to an article in Science Daily,† women who are having difficulty becoming pregnant sometimes use human growth hormone (HGH) in addition to in-vitro fertilization (IVF) to try to have a baby. A large study found that "there was no strong evi