A survey is conducted on 700 Californians older than 30 years of age. The study wants to obtain inference on the relationship between years of education and yearly income in dollars. The response variable is income in dollars and the explanatory variable is years of education. A simple linear regression model is fit, and the output from R is below:

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
### Study on the Relationship Between Education and Yearly Income in Californians Over 30

A survey is conducted on 700 Californians older than 30 years of age. The study aims to obtain inference on the relationship between years of education and yearly income in dollars. The response variable is income in dollars, and the explanatory variable is years of education.

A simple linear regression model is fit, and the output from R is below:

```R
lm(formula = Income ~ Education, data = CA)
```

**Coefficients:**

|              | Estimate | Std. Error | t value | Pr(>|t|)            |
|--------------|----------|------------|---------|---------------------|
| (Intercept)  | 25200.25 | 1488.94    | 16.93   | 3.08e-10 ***        |
| Education    | 2905.35  | 112.61     | 25.80   | 1.49e-12 ***        |

**Additional Model Information:**

- **Residual standard error:** 32400 on 698 degrees of freedom
- **Multiple R-squared:** 0.7602

**Explanation of Results:**

- **Intercept (25200.25):** This is the estimated income (in dollars) for a person with zero years of education.
- **Education (2905.35):** This coefficient indicates the increase in yearly income (in dollars) for each additional year of education. In this case, each additional year of education corresponds to an increase of approximately $2905.35 in yearly income.
  
**Significance Codes:**

The significance codes indicate the statistical significance of the coefficients. Generally, the smaller the p-value, the stronger the evidence against the null hypothesis, suggesting that the coefficient is not zero and the variable has a meaningful impact on the response variable.

- '***': p-value < 0.001 : Highly significant
Transcribed Image Text:### Study on the Relationship Between Education and Yearly Income in Californians Over 30 A survey is conducted on 700 Californians older than 30 years of age. The study aims to obtain inference on the relationship between years of education and yearly income in dollars. The response variable is income in dollars, and the explanatory variable is years of education. A simple linear regression model is fit, and the output from R is below: ```R lm(formula = Income ~ Education, data = CA) ``` **Coefficients:** | | Estimate | Std. Error | t value | Pr(>|t|) | |--------------|----------|------------|---------|---------------------| | (Intercept) | 25200.25 | 1488.94 | 16.93 | 3.08e-10 *** | | Education | 2905.35 | 112.61 | 25.80 | 1.49e-12 *** | **Additional Model Information:** - **Residual standard error:** 32400 on 698 degrees of freedom - **Multiple R-squared:** 0.7602 **Explanation of Results:** - **Intercept (25200.25):** This is the estimated income (in dollars) for a person with zero years of education. - **Education (2905.35):** This coefficient indicates the increase in yearly income (in dollars) for each additional year of education. In this case, each additional year of education corresponds to an increase of approximately $2905.35 in yearly income. **Significance Codes:** The significance codes indicate the statistical significance of the coefficients. Generally, the smaller the p-value, the stronger the evidence against the null hypothesis, suggesting that the coefficient is not zero and the variable has a meaningful impact on the response variable. - '***': p-value < 0.001 : Highly significant
**Question:**
Assume someone can have 0 years of education. Does the intercept have a useful interpretation? And if so, what is that interpretation?

**Answer Options:**
1. ( ) No useful interpretation.
2. ( ) Yes, it is the estimated expected income of someone with 1 year of education.
3. ( ) Yes, it is the estimated expected income of someone with 0 years of education.
4. ( ) Yes, it is the estimated expected income of someone with the most years of education.
Transcribed Image Text:**Question:** Assume someone can have 0 years of education. Does the intercept have a useful interpretation? And if so, what is that interpretation? **Answer Options:** 1. ( ) No useful interpretation. 2. ( ) Yes, it is the estimated expected income of someone with 1 year of education. 3. ( ) Yes, it is the estimated expected income of someone with 0 years of education. 4. ( ) Yes, it is the estimated expected income of someone with the most years of education.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman