A statistical program is recommended. The Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University reported data showing the odds of an Internal Revenue Service audit. The following table shows the average adjusted gross income reported (in dollars) and the percent of the returns that were audited for 20 selected IRS districts. District AdjustedGross Income ($) PercentAudited Los Angeles 36,664 1.3 Sacramento 38,845 1.1 Atlanta 34,886 1.1 Boise 32,512 1.1 Dallas 34,531 1.0 Providence 35,995 1.0 San Jose 37,799 0.9 Cheyenne 33,876 0.9 Fargo 30,513 0.9 New Orleans 30,174 0.9 Oklahoma City 30,060 0.8 Houston 37,153 0.8 Portland 34,918 0.7 Phoenix 33,291 0.7 Augusta 31,504 0.7 Albuquerque 29,199 0.6 Greensboro 33,072 0.6 Columbia 30,859 0.5 Nashville 32,566 0.5 Buffalo 34,296 0.5 (a) Develop the estimated regression equation that could be used to predict the percent audited given the average adjusted gross income reported (in dollars). (Round your value for the y-intercept to three decimal places and your value for the slope to six decimal places.) ŷ = −0.471+0.000039x (b) At the 0.05 level of significance, determine whether the adjusted gross income (in dollars) and the percent audited are related. (Use the F test.) State the null and alternative hypotheses. H0: β0 ≠ 0Ha: β0 = 0H0: β1 ≥ 0Ha: β1 < 0 H0: β1 ≠ 0Ha: β1 = 0H0: β1 = 0Ha: β1 ≠ 0H0: β0 = 0Ha: β0 ≠ 0 Find the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) Find the p-value. (Round your answer to three decimal places.) p-value = State your conclusion. Reject H0. We cannot conclude that the relationship between the adjusted gross income (in dollars) and the percent audited is significant.Reject H0. We conclude that the relationship between the adjusted gross income (in dollars) and the percent audited is significant. Do not reject H0. We conclude that the relationship between the adjusted gross income (in dollars) and the percent audited is significant.Do not reject H0. We cannot conclude that the relationship between the adjusted gross income (in dollars) and the percent audited is significant. (c) Did the estimated regression equation provide a good fit? Explain. (Round your answer to three decimal places.) Since r2 = is ---Select--- at least 0.55 less than 0.55 , the estimated regression equation ---Select--- did not provide provided a good fit. (d) Use the estimated regression equation developed in part (a) to calculate a 95% confidence interval for the expected percent audited for districts with an average adjusted gross income of $30,000. (Round your answers to two decimal places.) % to %
A statistical program is recommended. The Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University reported data showing the odds of an Internal Revenue Service audit. The following table shows the average adjusted gross income reported (in dollars) and the percent of the returns that were audited for 20 selected IRS districts. District AdjustedGross Income ($) PercentAudited Los Angeles 36,664 1.3 Sacramento 38,845 1.1 Atlanta 34,886 1.1 Boise 32,512 1.1 Dallas 34,531 1.0 Providence 35,995 1.0 San Jose 37,799 0.9 Cheyenne 33,876 0.9 Fargo 30,513 0.9 New Orleans 30,174 0.9 Oklahoma City 30,060 0.8 Houston 37,153 0.8 Portland 34,918 0.7 Phoenix 33,291 0.7 Augusta 31,504 0.7 Albuquerque 29,199 0.6 Greensboro 33,072 0.6 Columbia 30,859 0.5 Nashville 32,566 0.5 Buffalo 34,296 0.5 (a) Develop the estimated regression equation that could be used to predict the percent audited given the average adjusted gross income reported (in dollars). (Round your value for the y-intercept to three decimal places and your value for the slope to six decimal places.) ŷ = −0.471+0.000039x (b) At the 0.05 level of significance, determine whether the adjusted gross income (in dollars) and the percent audited are related. (Use the F test.) State the null and alternative hypotheses. H0: β0 ≠ 0Ha: β0 = 0H0: β1 ≥ 0Ha: β1 < 0 H0: β1 ≠ 0Ha: β1 = 0H0: β1 = 0Ha: β1 ≠ 0H0: β0 = 0Ha: β0 ≠ 0 Find the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) Find the p-value. (Round your answer to three decimal places.) p-value = State your conclusion. Reject H0. We cannot conclude that the relationship between the adjusted gross income (in dollars) and the percent audited is significant.Reject H0. We conclude that the relationship between the adjusted gross income (in dollars) and the percent audited is significant. Do not reject H0. We conclude that the relationship between the adjusted gross income (in dollars) and the percent audited is significant.Do not reject H0. We cannot conclude that the relationship between the adjusted gross income (in dollars) and the percent audited is significant. (c) Did the estimated regression equation provide a good fit? Explain. (Round your answer to three decimal places.) Since r2 = is ---Select--- at least 0.55 less than 0.55 , the estimated regression equation ---Select--- did not provide provided a good fit. (d) Use the estimated regression equation developed in part (a) to calculate a 95% confidence interval for the expected percent audited for districts with an average adjusted gross income of $30,000. (Round your answers to two decimal places.) % to %
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
A statistical program is recommended.
The Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University reported data showing the odds of an Internal Revenue Service audit. The following table shows the average adjusted gross income reported (in dollars) and the percent of the returns that were audited for 20 selected IRS districts.
District | Adjusted Gross Income ($) |
Percent Audited |
---|---|---|
Los Angeles | 36,664 | 1.3 |
Sacramento | 38,845 | 1.1 |
Atlanta | 34,886 | 1.1 |
Boise | 32,512 | 1.1 |
Dallas | 34,531 | 1.0 |
Providence | 35,995 | 1.0 |
San Jose | 37,799 | 0.9 |
Cheyenne | 33,876 | 0.9 |
Fargo | 30,513 | 0.9 |
New Orleans | 30,174 | 0.9 |
Oklahoma City | 30,060 | 0.8 |
Houston | 37,153 | 0.8 |
Portland | 34,918 | 0.7 |
Phoenix | 33,291 | 0.7 |
Augusta | 31,504 | 0.7 |
Albuquerque | 29,199 | 0.6 |
Greensboro | 33,072 | 0.6 |
Columbia | 30,859 | 0.5 |
Nashville | 32,566 | 0.5 |
Buffalo | 34,296 | 0.5 |
(a)
Develop the estimated regression equation that could be used to predict the percent audited given the average adjusted gross income reported (in dollars). (Round your value for the y-intercept to three decimal places and your value for the slope to six decimal places.)
ŷ =
−0.471+0.000039x
(b)
At the 0.05 level of significance, determine whether the adjusted gross income (in dollars) and the percent audited are related. (Use the F test.)
State the null and alternative hypotheses.
H0: β0 ≠ 0
Ha: β0 = 0H0: β1 ≥ 0
Ha: β1 < 0 H0: β1 ≠ 0
Ha: β1 = 0H0: β1 = 0
Ha: β1 ≠ 0H0: β0 = 0
Ha: β0 ≠ 0
Ha: β0 = 0H0: β1 ≥ 0
Ha: β1 < 0 H0: β1 ≠ 0
Ha: β1 = 0H0: β1 = 0
Ha: β1 ≠ 0H0: β0 = 0
Ha: β0 ≠ 0
Find the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
Find the p-value. (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
p-value =
State your conclusion.
Reject H0. We cannot conclude that the relationship between the adjusted gross income (in dollars) and the percent audited is significant.Reject H0. We conclude that the relationship between the adjusted gross income (in dollars) and the percent audited is significant. Do not reject H0. We conclude that the relationship between the adjusted gross income (in dollars) and the percent audited is significant.Do not reject H0. We cannot conclude that the relationship between the adjusted gross income (in dollars) and the percent audited is significant.
(c)
Did the estimated regression equation provide a good fit? Explain. (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
Since
r2 =
is ---Select--- at least 0.55 less than 0.55 , the estimated regression equation ---Select--- did not provide provided a good fit.(d)
Use the estimated regression equation developed in part (a) to calculate a 95% confidence interval for the expected percent audited for districts with an average adjusted gross income of $30,000. (Round your answers to two decimal places.)
% to %
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 5 steps with 4 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman