A shear pin made from a 4340 steel (0.4% C) fails by ductile fracture. It was supposed to be initially normalised, austenitised, quenched and tempered to 100% martensite to give a hardness of 5.5 GPa. The hardness was measured to be 4.5 GPa. Which of the following summaries most accurately accounts for what may have gone wrong? O Insufficiently heating the steel would result in partial austenitisation, leading to only partial martensite after quenching and a reduction in final hardness. The temper could still occur at the correct conditions and still lead to an insufficient strength and encouraging ductile failure. O Performing a full austenitisation but then cooling slower than the critical cooling rate for the alloy would allow some ferrite/pearlite to form after the martensite reaction has finished. This would be softer than the tempered martensite and so reduce the final hardness. O Assuming a full austenitisation and then cooling faster than the critical cooling rate, the hardness would exceed the required hardness. Tempering at an excessive temperature would reduce the hardness too much and also reduce the ductility, which is consistent with the mode of failure. O If the carbon content of the alloy was lower than expected then we might get incomplete austenitisation at a temperature sufficient to fully transform correct alloy, leading to retention of softer austenite at room temperature. The resulting hardness of the tempered martensite would also be lower than desired due to reduced solution strengthening by the carbon.

Elements Of Electromagnetics
7th Edition
ISBN:9780190698614
Author:Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
Publisher:Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
ChapterMA: Math Assessment
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1.1MA
icon
Related questions
Question
A shear pin made from a 4340 steel (0.4% C) fails by ductile fracture. It was supposed to be initially normalised, austenitised, quenched and tempered to 100% martensite to give
a hardness of 5.5 GPa. The hardness was measured to be 4.5 GPa. Which of the following summaries most accurately accounts for what may have gone wrong?
O Insufficiently heating the steel would result in partial austenitisation, leading to only partial martensite after quenching and a reduction in final hardness. The temper could
still occur at the correct conditions and still lead to an insufficient strength and encouraging ductile failure.
O Performing a full austenitisation but then cooling slower than the critical cooling rate for the alloy would allow some ferrite/pearlite to form after the martensite reaction
has finished. This would be softer than the tempered martensite and so reduce the final hardness.
O Assuming a full austenitisation and then cooling faster than the critical cooling rate, the hardness would exceed the required hardness. Tempering at an excessive
temperature would reduce the hardness too much and also reduce the ductility, which i consistent with the mode of failure.
O If the carbon content of the alloy was lower than expected then we might get incomplete austenitisation at a temperature sufficient to fully transform correct alloy, leading
to retention of softer austenite at room temperature. The resulting hardness of the tempered martensite would also be lower than desired due to reduced solution
strengthening by the carbon.
Transcribed Image Text:A shear pin made from a 4340 steel (0.4% C) fails by ductile fracture. It was supposed to be initially normalised, austenitised, quenched and tempered to 100% martensite to give a hardness of 5.5 GPa. The hardness was measured to be 4.5 GPa. Which of the following summaries most accurately accounts for what may have gone wrong? O Insufficiently heating the steel would result in partial austenitisation, leading to only partial martensite after quenching and a reduction in final hardness. The temper could still occur at the correct conditions and still lead to an insufficient strength and encouraging ductile failure. O Performing a full austenitisation but then cooling slower than the critical cooling rate for the alloy would allow some ferrite/pearlite to form after the martensite reaction has finished. This would be softer than the tempered martensite and so reduce the final hardness. O Assuming a full austenitisation and then cooling faster than the critical cooling rate, the hardness would exceed the required hardness. Tempering at an excessive temperature would reduce the hardness too much and also reduce the ductility, which i consistent with the mode of failure. O If the carbon content of the alloy was lower than expected then we might get incomplete austenitisation at a temperature sufficient to fully transform correct alloy, leading to retention of softer austenite at room temperature. The resulting hardness of the tempered martensite would also be lower than desired due to reduced solution strengthening by the carbon.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Theories of Failure
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, mechanical-engineering and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Elements Of Electromagnetics
Elements Of Electromagnetics
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9780190698614
Author:
Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Mechanics of Materials (10th Edition)
Mechanics of Materials (10th Edition)
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9780134319650
Author:
Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:
PEARSON
Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach
Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781259822674
Author:
Yunus A. Cengel Dr., Michael A. Boles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Control Systems Engineering
Control Systems Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781118170519
Author:
Norman S. Nise
Publisher:
WILEY
Mechanics of Materials (MindTap Course List)
Mechanics of Materials (MindTap Course List)
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781337093347
Author:
Barry J. Goodno, James M. Gere
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781118807330
Author:
James L. Meriam, L. G. Kraige, J. N. Bolton
Publisher:
WILEY