A risk-averse expected-utility maximizer has initial wealth w0 and utility function u. She facesa risk of a financial loss of L dollars, which occurs with probability π. An insurance companyoffers to sell a policy that costs p dollars per dollar of coverage (per dollar paid back in theevent of a loss). Denote by x the number of dollars of coverage.(a) Give the formula for her expected utility V (x) as a function of x.(b)  Suppose that u(z) = −e−zλ, π = 1/4, L = 100 and p = 1/3. Write V (x)using these values. There should be three variables, x, λ and w. Find the optimal value of x,as a function of λ and w, by solving the first-order condition (set the derivative of the expectedutility with respect to x equal to zero). (The second-order condition for this problem holds butyou do not need to check it.) Does the optimal amount of coverage increase or decrease in λ,where λ > 0?(c)  Repeat exercise (b), but with p = 1/6.(d) You should find that for either (b) or (c), the optimal coverage is increasing in λ,and that in the other case it is decreasing in λ. Reconcile these two results.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question

A risk-averse expected-utility maximizer has initial wealth w0 and utility function u. She faces
a risk of a financial loss of L dollars, which occurs with probability π. An insurance company
offers to sell a policy that costs p dollars per dollar of coverage (per dollar paid back in the
event of a loss). Denote by x the number of dollars of coverage.
(a) Give the formula for her expected utility V (x) as a function of x.
(b)  Suppose that u(z) = −e
−zλ
, π = 1/4, L = 100 and p = 1/3. Write V (x)
using these values. There should be three variables, x, λ and w. Find the optimal value of x,
as a function of λ and w, by solving the first-order condition (set the derivative of the expected
utility with respect to x equal to zero). (The second-order condition for this problem holds but
you do not need to check it.) Does the optimal amount of coverage increase or decrease in λ,
where λ > 0?
(c)  Repeat exercise (b), but with p = 1/6.
(d) You should find that for either (b) or (c), the optimal coverage is increasing in λ,
and that in the other case it is decreasing in λ. Reconcile these two results.

AI-Generated Solution
AI-generated content may present inaccurate or offensive content that does not represent bartleby’s views.
steps

Unlock instant AI solutions

Tap the button
to generate a solution

Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education