A risk averse individual faces a risk. The individual's utility function is U(W)= In(W) where W is the wealth of the individual. The individual has an initial amount of wealth of 1000$. 20% of the time, the individual will lose 200$. The other 80% of the time, his wealth remains at its initial level. a) An insurer offers a premium of 50$ to the individual. Should the risk averse individual accept the deal? b) Now suppose that the risk averse individual has an initial wealth of 400$ instead of 1000$. The premium is still 50$. Should he accept the deal? c) Would a risk neutral individual accept a premium of 50$? Show why or why not by calculating the expected utility of the risk neutral individual.

A risk averse individual faces a risk. The individual's utility function is U(W)= In(W) where W is the wealth of the individual. The individual has an initial amount of wealth of 1000$. 20% of the time, the individual will lose 200$. The other 80% of the time, his wealth remains at its initial level. a) An insurer offers a premium of 50$ to the individual. Should the risk averse individual accept the deal? b) Now suppose that the risk averse individual has an initial wealth of 400$ instead of 1000$. The premium is still 50$. Should he accept the deal? c) Would a risk neutral individual accept a premium of 50$? Show why or why not by calculating the expected utility of the risk neutral individual.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

19. An individual has initial wealth Wo = 3 and has the opportunity to invest some quantity of money x in an extremely risky corporate bond. With probability p= 1/4, the bond will be worth 10x at maturity. With probability 1 – p, it will be worth zero. The individual's utility function over final wealth is u(W) = W0.5. What is the level of investment x that maximizes expected utility? (а) 0 (b) 1 (c) 4/3 (d) V3 (e) 2
An expected utility maximiser owns a car worth £60 000 and has a bank account with £20 000. The money in the bank is safe, but there is a 50% probability that the car will be stolen. The utility of wealth for the agent is u(y) = In(y) and they have no other assets. Suppose that another firm provides car insurance in which the agent can buy each unit of indemnity at an actuarially fair rate. What insurace coverage would the consumer choose under the new price? O a. £60 000 O b. £30 000 O c. £20 000 O d. £40 000
Joey has utility function 1+√x where x is the amount of money he has. He is... A) Cannot tell from the information provided B) Risk averse C) Risk Netutral D) Risk Loving
Lucy and Henry each have $1652. Each knows that with 0.1 probability, they will lose 85% of their wealth. They both have the option of buying a units of insurance, with each unit costing $0.1. Each unit of insurance pays out $1 in the event the loss occurs. The cost of the insurance policy is paid regardless of whether the loss is incurred. Lucy's utility is given by u²(x) = x, Henry's utility is given by u¹(x) = √√x. Answer the following: (If rounding is needed, only round at the end and write your answer to three decimal places.) a) Without insurance, what is the expected value of the loss? b) c) d). e) ( For Henry, facing the "lottery " above without any insurance is as bad as losing how many dollars for sure? Find Lucy's utility maximising choice of a. If more than 1 exist, enter the largest a. Now suppose insurance costs $0.2. Find Lucy's utility maximising choice of a. If more than 1 exist, enter the largest a. What is Henry's utility maximising choice of a with the new price of…
The value of a successful project is $420,000; the probabilities of success are 1/2 with good supervision and 1/4 without. The manager is risk neutral, not risk averse as in the text, so his expected utility equals his expected income minus his disutility of effort. He can get other jobs paying $90,000, and his disutility for exerting the extra effort for good supervision on your project is $100,000. (a) Show that inducing high effort would require the firm to offer a compensation scheme with a negative base salary; that is, if the project fails, the manager pays the firm an amount stipulated in the scheme. (b) How might a negative base salary be implemented in reality? (c) Show that if a negative base salary is not feasible, then the firm does better to settle for the low-pay, low-effort situation.
Explain why the variance of an investment is a useful measure of the risk associated with it
Setup from Question 1) An expected utility maximiser owns a car worth £60 000 and has a bank account with £20 000. The money in the bank is safe, but there is a 50% probability that the car will be stolen. The utility of wealth for the agent is u(y) = In(y) and they have no other assets. Question 2)
David is an expected-utility maximizer that likes to drive fast (and reckless at times), so his probability of an accident is 2/3. David's preferences over wealth are u(w) = vw. Suppose that David's initial wealth is $100. If David has an accident, he incurs a $51 loss. How much is the risk premium David willing to pay to be as well off in case of accident or not?
Which of the following shapes is the most likely plot of the utility-of-wealth function for a risk-averse person? Utility OA B D B D A Wealth C
An investor has preferences represented by a utility function u(c) and initial wealth w > 0. Consider an asset that pays G with probability \pi and B with probability 1-\pi. 1.1 Suppose the investor owns this asset. What is the minimum price he would sell it for? (It is sufficient to formulate the condition that this price must satisfy). 1.2 Suppose he does not own it. What is the maximum price he would be willing to pay to buy it? (It is sufficient to formulate the condition that this price must satisfy). 1.3 Explain why (or under which conditions) the buy and sell prices you have found are or are not the same. 1.4 Suppose w = 10, G = 10, B = 5 and u(c) = √c. Compute the buy and sell prices.
9. Problems and Applications Q9 Dmitri has a utility function U = W, where W is his wealth in millions of dollars and U is the utility he obtains from that wealth. In the final stage of a game show, the host offers Dmitri a choice between (A) $4 million for sure, or (B) a gamble that pays $1 million with probability 0.4 and $9 million with probability 0.6. Use the blue curve (circle points) to graph Dmitri's utility function at wealth levels of $0, $1 million, $4 million, $9 million, and $16 million. Utility (Thousands) 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 0 2 4 8 6 10 12 14 Wealth (Millions of dollars) 16 18 20 V Utility Function ?
Priyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index . There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,000. a) Would Priyanka be willing to spend £500 to purchase an insurance policy that would fully insure her against this loss? Explain. b) What would be the highest price (premium) that she would be willing to pay for an insurance policy that fully insures her against the flooding damage?