A property manager tells Marisa, who is Afro- Latina, that no apartments are available in an apartment complex. Marisa wonders if she has been discriminated against on the basis of her race. She asks her partner, who is white, to apply for the unit. Her partner's application is accepted. Marisa decides to file a discrimination complaint with HUD. How long does she have from the time of the violation to file? Marisa has one year to file with HUD. Marisa has six months to file with HUD. Marisa has 90 days to file with HUD. If she also wants to file a civil lawsuit, however, she has two years. Marisa has two years to file with HUD. However, it is unlikely that HUD will take the case since property managers are not covered

A property manager tells Marisa, who is Afro- Latina, that no apartments are available in an apartment complex. Marisa wonders if she has been discriminated against on the basis of her race. She asks her partner, who is white, to apply for the unit. Her partner's application is accepted. Marisa decides to file a discrimination complaint with HUD. How long does she have from the time of the violation to file? Marisa has one year to file with HUD. Marisa has six months to file with HUD. Marisa has 90 days to file with HUD. If she also wants to file a civil lawsuit, however, she has two years. Marisa has two years to file with HUD. However, it is unlikely that HUD will take the case since property managers are not covered

Principles Of Marketing

17th Edition

ISBN:9780134492513

Author:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)

Publisher:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)

Chapter1: Marketing: Creating Customer Value And Engagement

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.1DQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Describe the duty of fair representation.
Lisa applied and interviewed for a manager position at her company and was not selected. She was not given any feedback from the interview, Tony her male coworker was selected for the position. Lisa felt the promotion was unfair, since she had more seniority than Tony, and decided to file a gender discrimination and play with her local equal opportunity commissioner the EEOC investigated the complaint, and did not find any evidence of discrimination. Both Lisa and Tony’s employment was in good standing however, Tony had passed managerial experience, which was listed as a requirement on the job. This aspect, then made him a strong, stronger candidate for the job than Lisa, who had more seniority, but lacked the experience and the next several months, Lisa noticed the change from her manager prior to the complaint being filled he was very personable towards her and often made small talk around the office. After the complaint he was very short with her, and did not engage in any small…
Bill is a technician at a university chemistry lab and is in charge of safety inspections and prevention of injury due to faulty equipment. One morning, as a result of his inspection, Bill discovers a gas burner with a broken valve. Bill gets distracted and fails to put an “OUT OF ORDER/DO NOT USE” sign on the faulty burner. When the morning class arrives, Halle uses the faulty burner and is burned when it catches fire. Bill’s negligence is based on: nonfeasance. misfeasance. negligence per se. res ipsa loquitur. A person cannot be guilty of negligence if he or she has no duty owed to the plaintiff. True False Jessica was caught shoplifting at a department store both by employees who witnessed the act and by cameras in the store. The store’s management may hold her as long as it takes to get her to confess. True False he highest and most comprehensive duty owed by a landowner to a person on the owner’s property is owed to: an invitee. a licensee. an…
Identify 5 different acts that take place in The Firm (book or film) that are both torts and crimes. Fully explain the tort and crime (including the elements of each) and apply it to the act in the film by way of explanation. In addition, explain how the wrongdoers were brought to justice at the end of the film.
Susan alleges that her job application was rejected by Bob and Ben in because of her ethnicity to establish that she was discriminated against based on her ethnicity and file suit against the company. Susan must.
The State of Florida has passed a statute nullifying any marriage that has previously been recognized, as well as outlawing any future marriages, for anyone who did not attend college. The statute gives no notice to any married couple and gives them no ability to challenge the statue. This statute has been challenged as unconstitutional by a group of married individuals as well as marriage equality groups. The groups have filed a Writ of Certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States, which was granted. You are a law clerk for one of the nine Supreme Court Justices. Your task is to outline what arguments might be filed in a brief filed by both sides of this issue, so your Justice will be prepared for the arguments made by either side. Please include arguments for those supporting and those opposing the law. These arguments should focus on: 1. The Equal Protection clause and the Due Process Clause (what analysis will a court perform to decide if there is a violation of these…
World Color operated a printing plant. a written policy stated: “Baseball caps are prohibited except for [world Color] baseball caps.” The policy permitted employees to accessorize their uniforms “in good taste and in accordance with all safety rules.” The Graphic Communications Conference of the international Brotherhood of Teamsters filed an unfair labor practice charge with the NLRB claiming that the policy prohibited employees from wearing union insignia at work. it said world Color was interfering with its employees’ “right to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, . . . and to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining” as guaranteed by federal law. The NLRB agreed and world Color appealed. Was the baseball cap policy an unfair labor practice?
n employee was terminated for smoking in a no smoking area. The union claimed that he should be reinstated because the company failed to follow due rocess procedures. When the company and the union could not agree, this case was referred to arbitration and the arbitrator ruled in favor of the employee. How should the company respond? our Response The company should reinstate the employee and follow due process in the future. The company should appeal the case to the district court. The company should request a hearing by a three-member panel of administrative law judges. The company should appeal the case to the NLRB. Feedback
Moises and Rutledge are discussing their views on the law. Moises believes that people should give up some of their rights to the government, but they should be able to retain other inalienable rights. Rutledge believes that the law is a rule of civil conduct prescribed by the supreme power in a state which commands what is right and prohibits what is wrong. Kilroy overhears their conversation and jumps in with his own belief, saying that the law is a social construct that should provide stability. order, and security. He also said that he believes people should relinquish all of their rights to the state. Which philosophers would agree with Moises, Rutledge, and Kilroy, respectively? O Montesquieu, Hobbes, Locke O Blackstone, Hobbes, Montesquieu O Locke, Blackstone, Hobbes O Montesquieu, Blackstone, Hobbes O Locke, Montesquieu, Blackstone
Following the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe, what rights do women have under theU.S. Constitution to determine whether to terminate their pregnancy? Explain your answerin detail
Connor applied to be an officer in the Canadian Forces, but his application was denied because of his poor credit rating. He filed a human rights complaint on the basis that the requirement to provide a credit check was discriminatory. Do you think his human rights complaint will be successful?
Assume Illinois passes a law requiring doctors to be certified before providing medical services to citizens of Illinois. You represent a client who is licensed to practice medicine in Indiana. Your client recently administered a drug to a patient in an emergency room of an Illinois hospital located right across the border of Indiana and Illinois. She is fined $50,000 and refuses to pay. What constitutional arguments can you make on your client’s behalf as to why this law is unconstitutional as applied to her.