A new viral disease has infected over 100 million people. The disease, however, appears to cause only mild symptoms that disappear after a couple of days, even though the virus lingers in the body for much longer than that. Therefore, the government has not invested in developing a medical cure.  According to the theoretical work of a team of well-credentialed, but controversial, biologists, this disease has the potential to cause serious harm a few years after the initial infection. Based on their computer simulations, they predict that the infection may prove lethal in almost half of cases unless patients are cured of the disease. Based on this, the researchers urge the government to rapidly invest in developing a cure.  The scientific community, however, predominantly rejects this view. According to a new scientific report, signed by over three hundred leading epidemiologists, medical experts, and biologists in the field, the infection is highly unlikely to cause any serious long-term harm. The report claims that prior laboratory data already rules out the possible biological mechanism that the research team proposed as the cause of long-term fatalities. So according to the majority of the scientific community, there is no cause for concern.  The government is considering whether to fund the development and distribution of a medical cure, which they believe would be relatively easy to accomplish. They estimate that this would cost approximately $5 million. Due to a limited budget, the government would need to take that amount from the part of the medical budget that was designated for the overdue upgrade of the technical equipment in the children’s hospital oncology (cancer) section. This upgrade is expected to save the lives of over 3,000 children over the next twenty-five years.

Social Psychology (10th Edition)
10th Edition
ISBN:9780134641287
Author:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers
Publisher:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers
Chapter1: Introducing Social Psychology
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ1
icon
Related questions
Question

Viral Disease

A new viral disease has infected over 100 million people. The disease, however, appears to cause only mild symptoms that disappear after a couple of days, even though the virus lingers in the body for much longer than that. Therefore, the government has not invested in developing a medical cure. 

According to the theoretical work of a team of well-credentialed, but controversial, biologists, this disease has the potential to cause serious harm a few years after the initial infection. Based on their computer simulations, they predict that the infection may prove lethal in almost half of cases unless patients are cured of the disease. Based on this, the researchers urge the government to rapidly invest in developing a cure. 

The scientific community, however, predominantly rejects this view. According to a new scientific report, signed by over three hundred leading epidemiologists, medical experts, and biologists in the field, the infection is highly unlikely to cause any serious long-term harm. The report claims that prior laboratory data already rules out the possible biological mechanism that the research team proposed as the cause of long-term fatalities. So according to the majority of the scientific community, there is no cause for concern. 

The government is considering whether to fund the development and distribution of a medical cure, which they believe would be relatively easy to accomplish. They estimate that this would cost approximately $5 million. Due to a limited budget, the government would need to take that amount from the part of the medical budget that was designated for the overdue upgrade of the technical equipment in the children’s hospital oncology (cancer) section. This upgrade is expected to save the lives of over 3,000 children over the next twenty-five years.

 

Should the government fund the development and distribution of this cure?

Please provide your answer as a number from -100 to 100, where -100 is "absolutely not" and 100 is "absolutely yes."
 
Viral Disease
A new viral disease has infected over 100 million people. The disease, however, appears
to cause only mild symptoms that disappear after a couple of days, even though the
virus lingers in the body for much longer than that. Therefore, the government has not
invested in developing a medical cure.
According to the theoretical work of a team of well-credentialed, but controversial,
biologists, this disease has the potential to cause serious harm a few years after the initial
infection. Based on their computer simulations, they predict that the infection may prove
lethal in almost half of cases unless patients are cured of the disease. Based on this, the
researchers urge the government to rapidly invest in developing a cure.
The scientific community, however, predominantly rejects this view. According to a new
scientific report, signed by over three hundred leading epidemiologists, medical experts,
and biologists in the field, the infection is highly unlikely to cause any serious long-term
harm. The report claims that prior laboratory data already rules out the possible
biological mechanism that the research team proposed as the cause of long-term
fatalities. So according to the majority of the scientific community, there is no cause for
concern.
The government is considering whether to fund the development and distribution of a
medical cure, which they believe would be relatively easy to accomplish. They estimate
that this would cost approximately $5 million. Due to a limited budget, the government
would need to take that amount from the part of the medical budget that was
designated for the overdue upgrade of the technical equipment in the children's hospital
oncology (cancer) section. This upgrade is expected to save the lives of over 3,000
children over the next twenty-five years.
Should the government fund the development and distribution of this cure?
Please provide your answer as a number from-100 to 100, where -100 is "absolutely not"
and 100 is "absolutely yes."
Transcribed Image Text:Viral Disease A new viral disease has infected over 100 million people. The disease, however, appears to cause only mild symptoms that disappear after a couple of days, even though the virus lingers in the body for much longer than that. Therefore, the government has not invested in developing a medical cure. According to the theoretical work of a team of well-credentialed, but controversial, biologists, this disease has the potential to cause serious harm a few years after the initial infection. Based on their computer simulations, they predict that the infection may prove lethal in almost half of cases unless patients are cured of the disease. Based on this, the researchers urge the government to rapidly invest in developing a cure. The scientific community, however, predominantly rejects this view. According to a new scientific report, signed by over three hundred leading epidemiologists, medical experts, and biologists in the field, the infection is highly unlikely to cause any serious long-term harm. The report claims that prior laboratory data already rules out the possible biological mechanism that the research team proposed as the cause of long-term fatalities. So according to the majority of the scientific community, there is no cause for concern. The government is considering whether to fund the development and distribution of a medical cure, which they believe would be relatively easy to accomplish. They estimate that this would cost approximately $5 million. Due to a limited budget, the government would need to take that amount from the part of the medical budget that was designated for the overdue upgrade of the technical equipment in the children's hospital oncology (cancer) section. This upgrade is expected to save the lives of over 3,000 children over the next twenty-five years. Should the government fund the development and distribution of this cure? Please provide your answer as a number from-100 to 100, where -100 is "absolutely not" and 100 is "absolutely yes."
Viral Disease
A new viral disease has infected over 100 million people. The disease, however, appears
to cause only mild symptoms that disappear after a couple of days, even though the
virus lingers in the body for much longer than that. Therefore, the government has not
invested in developing a medical cure.
According to the theoretical work of a team of well-credentialed, but controversial,
biologists, this disease has the potential to cause serious harm a few years after the initial
infection. Based on their computer simulations, they predict that the infection may prove
lethal in almost half of cases unless patients are cured of the disease. Based on this, the
researchers urge the government to rapidly invest in developing a cure.
The scientific community, however, predominantly rejects this view. According to a new
scientific report, signed by over three hundred leading epidemiologists, medical experts,
and biologists in the field, the infection is highly unlikely to cause any serious long-term
harm. The report claims that prior laboratory data already rules out the possible
biological mechanism that the research team proposed as the cause of long-term
fatalities. So according to the majority of the scientific community, there is no cause for
concern.
The government is considering whether to fund the development and distribution of a
medical cure, which they believe would be relatively easy to accomplish. They estimate
that this would cost approximately $5 million. Due to a limited budget, the government
would need to take that amount from the part of the medical budget that was
designated for the overdue upgrade of the technical equipment in the children's hospital
oncology (cancer) section. This upgrade is expected to save the lives of over 3,000
children over the next twenty-five years.
Should the government fund the development and distribution of this cure?
Please provide your answer as a number from-100 to 100, where -100 is "absolutely not"
and 100 is "absolutely yes."
Transcribed Image Text:Viral Disease A new viral disease has infected over 100 million people. The disease, however, appears to cause only mild symptoms that disappear after a couple of days, even though the virus lingers in the body for much longer than that. Therefore, the government has not invested in developing a medical cure. According to the theoretical work of a team of well-credentialed, but controversial, biologists, this disease has the potential to cause serious harm a few years after the initial infection. Based on their computer simulations, they predict that the infection may prove lethal in almost half of cases unless patients are cured of the disease. Based on this, the researchers urge the government to rapidly invest in developing a cure. The scientific community, however, predominantly rejects this view. According to a new scientific report, signed by over three hundred leading epidemiologists, medical experts, and biologists in the field, the infection is highly unlikely to cause any serious long-term harm. The report claims that prior laboratory data already rules out the possible biological mechanism that the research team proposed as the cause of long-term fatalities. So according to the majority of the scientific community, there is no cause for concern. The government is considering whether to fund the development and distribution of a medical cure, which they believe would be relatively easy to accomplish. They estimate that this would cost approximately $5 million. Due to a limited budget, the government would need to take that amount from the part of the medical budget that was designated for the overdue upgrade of the technical equipment in the children's hospital oncology (cancer) section. This upgrade is expected to save the lives of over 3,000 children over the next twenty-five years. Should the government fund the development and distribution of this cure? Please provide your answer as a number from-100 to 100, where -100 is "absolutely not" and 100 is "absolutely yes."
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Social Psychology (10th Edition)
Social Psychology (10th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134641287
Author:
Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers
Publisher:
Pearson College Div
Introduction to Sociology (Eleventh Edition)
Introduction to Sociology (Eleventh Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780393639407
Author:
Deborah Carr, Anthony Giddens, Mitchell Duneier, Richard P. Appelbaum
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
The Basics of Social Research (MindTap Course Lis…
The Basics of Social Research (MindTap Course Lis…
Sociology
ISBN:
9781305503076
Author:
Earl R. Babbie
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Scien…
Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Scien…
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134477596
Author:
Saferstein, Richard
Publisher:
PEARSON
Sociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach (13th Edition)
Sociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach (13th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134205571
Author:
James M. Henslin
Publisher:
PEARSON
Society: The Basics (14th Edition)
Society: The Basics (14th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134206325
Author:
John J. Macionis
Publisher:
PEARSON