A California Superior court in Los Angle County is deciding a case involving an issue that has never been addressed by the California courts or the Federal courts. The judge looks at the laws of Arizona which are very similar to California law and found an Arizona Supreme Court case identical to the case he was trying. Is the Judge obligated to use theArizona decision and why?

A California Superior court in Los Angle County is deciding a case involving an issue that has never been addressed by the California courts or the Federal courts. The judge looks at the laws of Arizona which are very similar to California law and found an Arizona Supreme Court case identical to the case he was trying. Is the Judge obligated to use theArizona decision and why?

Similar questions

1. What is the full name of the Tribunal? What are the types of cases that are heard? 2. What is the complete citation for the enabling legislation? 3. Aside from the enabling legislation - list any other statutes this tribunal has the jurisdiction to interpret. 4. What year was this tribunal created? 5. Who are the usual parties who appear at this tribunal? 6. What is the name of the rules of procedure for this tribunal? 7. What is the website address for the tribunal? 8. Is this tribunal inquisitorial or adversarial in nature? 9. Is this tribunal subject to…
At both federal and state levels there are civil and criminal courts. What types of cases are handled in civil courts? In criminal courts?
Frank places a sign in his front year supporting a law which would deport all non-Caucasian immigrants from the U.S. Emily places a sign in her front yard supporting a candidate in an upcoming election. Miguel places a sign in his front yard supporting a law which requires ride-sharing companies (like Lyft) to properly pay their drivers. Assuming their city adopts an ordinance which prohibits all signs being placed in any resident's front yard, who will be permitted to keep displaying their sign? Choose all of the correct answers. A. Frank B. Emily C. Miguel
The State of Florida has passed a statute nullifying any marriage that has previously been recognized, as well as outlawing any future marriages, for anyone who did not attend college. The statute gives no notice to any married couple and gives them no ability to challenge the statue. This statute has been challenged as unconstitutional by a group of married individuals as well as marriage equality groups. The groups have filed a Writ of Certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States, which was granted. You are a law clerk for one of the nine Supreme Court Justices. Your task is to outline what arguments might be filed in a brief filed by both sides of this issue, so your Justice will be prepared for the arguments made by either side. Please include arguments for those supporting and those opposing the law. These arguments should focus on: 1. The Equal Protection clause and the Due Process Clause (what analysis will a court perform to decide if there is a violation of these…
Analyze the role of the judiciary on administrative agency authority and rulemaking by focusing on how oversight by the courts is a check and balance on administrative agencies.
Assume that there are two conflicting statutes. One of the statutes is a state statute published in 1970, and the other statute is a federal statute published in 1995. Each of these two statutes is about interstate commerce. Which statute would prevail? O It depends on the jurisdiction. O The state statute, because interstate commerce is a state issue. O The federal statute, because it is newer. O The federal statute, because of the supremacy clause. O The state statute, because of the division of federalism.
Brad Pitt v. Sam Peterson, the hot dog vendor. Brad seeks the return of his car keys. If you could prove your point and relate it to another/differnt case that would be great
Following the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe, what rights do women have under theU.S. Constitution to determine whether to terminate their pregnancy? Explain your answerin detail
Assume Illinois passes a law requiring doctors to be certified before providing medical services to citizens of Illinois. You represent a client who is licensed to practice medicine in Indiana. Your client recently administered a drug to a patient in an emergency room of an Illinois hospital located right across the border of Indiana and Illinois. She is fined $50,000 and refuses to pay. What constitutional arguments can you make on your client’s behalf as to why this law is unconstitutional as applied to her.
Bobby is an investment banker in NYC. Although he currently has several criminal charges pending against him, Bobby is being sued by Alyssa in civil court for "emotional damages" due to a very public and embarrassing breakup in one of her favorite restaurants. Alyssa had already sued him once previously for this exact same issue in the exact same court of law. Alyssa's most recent lawsuit would be denied by this court of law on the grounds of what legal principle? O Dyads O Dicta O Double jeopardy O Lex Talionis O Res Judicata
Give an example of a statute at the Federal Level and at the State Level. Give an example of an Administrative Agency at the Federal level. Please list the 3 equitable remedies available to someone in a lawsuit.
When an offender is a corporation, should the court use different sentencing criteria?Do you concur with Stewart, J., who rendered a decision in the United Keno Hill Mines case, regarding the pertinent factors to be taken into account in environmental cases?Do you believe the most beneficial "creative sentencing" clauses?Any sentencing guidelines that haven't been covered in the text, in your opinion?What do you believe would serve as the most potent deterrent?