6.Nash BargainingPlayers 1 and 2 bargain over how to split a pie of size 1. Suppose the playerssimultaneously announce how much of the pie they claim for themselves. Letx; denote the claim of player i e {1,2}. Claims have to satisfy 0 < r; < 1. Ifx1 + x2 <1 then each player gets her claim, i.e. player 1 gets 1 and player 2gets x2. If r1 + x2 > 1, then neither player gets anything. Suppose that eachplayer's utility is strictly increasing in the amount of pie she gets. Find all Nashequilibria.

Given information 2 players= player 1 and player 2 size of pie=1 X1 and X2 = claim for pie Both…

6 Nash Bargaining Players 1 and 2 bargain over how to split a pie of size 1. Suppose the players simultaneously announce how much of the pie they claim for themselves. Let T; denote the claim of player i e {1,2}. Claims have to satisfy 0 < x; < 1. If xi + x2 <1 then each player gets her claim, i.e. player 1 gets r1 and player 2 gets r2. If r1 + x2 > 1, then neither player gets anything. Suppose that each player's utility is strictly increasing in the amount of pie she gets. Find all Nash equilibria.

6 Nash Bargaining Players 1 and 2 bargain over how to split a pie of size 1. Suppose the players simultaneously announce how much of the pie they claim for themselves. Let T; denote the claim of player i e {1,2}. Claims have to satisfy 0 < x; < 1. If xi + x2 <1 then each player gets her claim, i.e. player 1 gets r1 and player 2 gets r2. If r1 + x2 > 1, then neither player gets anything. Suppose that each player's utility is strictly increasing in the amount of pie she gets. Find all Nash equilibria.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Please no written by hand and no emage
2. Consider a two-stage game of complete but imperfect information where players 1 and 2 simultaneously choose actions a₁ and a₂ in stage 1 and players 3 and 4 simultaneously choose actions a3 and a in stage 2. Provide the notation for the Nash equilibrium in stage 2. How come players 1 and 2 can anticipate this outcome in stage 2?
Here is a Bayesian BOS game. Man has a special preference t1 on boxing while woman has a special preference t2 on opera. Both are in [0,2]. The preference information is private. i.e. Each knows his (her) own preference but does not know the other's preference. The below is the payoff. M/W Boxing Opera Воxing 3+t1,1 0,0 Opera 0,0 1,3+t2 We are checking whether the below strategy profile is a Bayesian Nash Equilibrium. "Man chooses boxing if t1>p while woman chooses opera if t2>g." 1) Given t1, man will choose boxing if t1> /g- 2) Given t2, woman will choose opera if t2> /p- 4) By shoving the simultaneous equations, we get p=q=sqrt(6)-
Consider the infinite repeated two-player game where at each stage the play- ers play the non-zero-sum game given by A В A (5, 5) (0,7) В (7, 0) | (2, 2) (a) Consider the following strategies: SA: always play A. SB: always play B. • St: play A on the first stage, thereafter copy what the other player did in the preceding stage. Suppose that the total payoff involves a discount factor 8, and that both players are restricted to the pure strategies SA, SB, and sT. Determine the set of d for which (ST, ST) is a Nash equilibrium. (b) Use the one stage deviation principle to determine whether the pair (ST, ST) is a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium for some range of val- ues of 8.
Consider the following payoff matrix B R U 7, 7 4,17 A 17,4 6,6 Players A and B repeatedly play this game with an infinite horizon. Future payoffs are discounted with 1/(1+r), where r is the long-term interest rate. Determine the interval of r for which the Carrot-and-Stick strategy does form a Nash-equilibrium when the opponent can discover any deviation immediately. Remember the following relation TA+Lt-1 (14+t) TB TB = TA + O r>0.1 O r0.2 Or-1 O r1
Consider the following game: p 2,10 0,5 5,2 0,5 5,10 Which of the following is FALSE for the SPE of this game? a. If p in [0.6, 1], then playing x is an equilibrim strategy for player 1 b. If p in [0, 0.6], then playing y is an equilibrim strategy for player 1 C. For all possible p values in [0,1], playing x is an equilibrium strategy for player 1 y y R Nature 1 2 1-p y R X 2,10
You should show that the best response map gives a fixed-point in symmetric strategies help please
3. Repeated Game Consider the game in which the stage game depicted below is infinitely repeated and in which both players discount future payoffs with discount factor 6 € [0, 1]. Player 1 E S Player 2 E 3,3 4, -1 S -1.4 1,1 (a) Suppose that both players play the tit-for-tat strategy. This strategy is characterized by exerting effort (playing E) in the first round. Then in future rounds, a player copies the action chosen by his opponent in the previous period (i.e if Player 2 shirks (plays S) in period 2, then Player 1 plays S in period 3). Then, for what values of d can tit-for-tat be supported on the equilibrium path of play? (b) Suppose that both players play the perfect tit-for-tat strategy. This strategy is characterized by exerting effort (playing E) in the first round. Then in future rounds, a player plays E unless the actions are disagreed in the previous period. Then, for what values of d can perfect tit-for-tat be supported on the equilibrium path of play?