Consider the following game: p 2,10 0,5 5,2 0,5 5,10 Which of the following is FALSE for the SPE of this game? a. If p in [0.6, 1], then playing x is an equilibrim strategy for player 1 b. If p in [0, 0.6], then playing y is an equilibrim strategy for player 1 C. For all possible p values in [0,1], playing x is an equilibrium strategy for player 1 y y R Nature 1 2 1-p y R X 2,10

Consider the following game: p 2,10 0,5 5,2 0,5 5,10 Which of the following is FALSE for the SPE of this game? a. If p in [0.6, 1], then playing x is an equilibrim strategy for player 1 b. If p in [0, 0.6], then playing y is an equilibrim strategy for player 1 C. For all possible p values in [0,1], playing x is an equilibrium strategy for player 1 y y R Nature 1 2 1-p y R X 2,10

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter15: Oligopoly And Strategic Behavior

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 17P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

GAME UUU B1 Player B B2 A1 7,13 5, 10 A2 3,8 9,16 Player A A3 5,8 4,7 In Game UUU (see table above), assuming players move simultaneously, Player A choosing A1 and Player B choosing B3 is a Nash equilibrium. Player A choosing A3 and Player B choosing B2 is a Nash equilibrium. Both Player A choosing A1 and Player B choosing B1 and Player A choosing A2 and player B choosing B2 are Nash equilibria in pure strategies Player A choosing A1 and Player B choosing B2 is a Nash equilibrium.
GAME 5 Player B B2 B1 Player A A1 7, 3 5, 10 A2 3, 8 9, 6 In Game 5 above, O there are no Nash equilibria in pure strategies. Player A choosing A1 and Player B choosing B2 is a Nash equilibrium. O Player A choosing A1 and Player B choosing B1 is a Nash equilibrium. O Player A choosing A2 and Player B choosing B1 is a Nash equilibrium.
Consider the following two-player game with three options for each player. (Payouts are listed for the row player first, then the column player.) player Y layery 3,3 A 1,5 4,4 6,2 K 8,1 3,7 5,2 0,6 1,1 Find a mixed Nash equilibrium for this game. Solution suggestion: Use two variables per player. If p and are the probabilities of selecting the first two strategies, then 1-p-q is the probability of selecting the third strategy. You will need to solve a system of equations.
Player 1 Player 2 2 X 4 2 y 1 3 X 2 2 b y O 6 3 1 4 2 X 1 5 y O Consider the game tree given above: a. Write out the set of pure strategies for all players. b. Find the Subgame Nash equilibria of this game.
Question 2: Consider the following game and let E be any possible number: Player 1 Player 2 A B 1,1 A B 2, E ɛ, 2 J 4,4
2. Consider the following Bayesian game with two players. Both players move simultaneously and player 1 can choose either H or L, while player 2's options are G, M, and D. With probability 1/2 the payoffs are given by "Game 1" : GMD H 1,2 1,0 1,3 L 2,4 0,0 0,5 and with probability 1/2 the payoffs are according to "Game 2" : G |M|D H 1,2 1,3 1,0 L 2,4 0,5 0,0 (a) Find the Nash Equilibria when neither player knows which game is actually played. (b) Assume now that player 2 knows which one among the two games is actually being played. Check that the game has a unique Bayesian Nash Equilibrium.
Player 2 C D A Player 1 2,3 В 6, —2 | 4, 3 7,8 Select the value corresponding to the probability with which player 2 plays C in the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium: O 1/8 O 1/6 1/5 O 1/4 1/3 1/2 2/3 O 3/4 4/5 O 5/6
Consider the following extensive form game between player 1 and player 2. T B (2, 2) L R R (3, 1) (0, 0) (5, 0) (0, 1) (a). Find the normal form representation of this game. (show the bimatrix) (b). Find all pure strategy NE. (c). Which of these equilibria are subgame perfect?
2- Consider the following game. Player 2 Player 1 U 12, 2 | 3, 9 5, 8 4, 2 D (a) Find all the Nash equilibria, pure and mixed. (b) Suppose that the payoff of the column player u:(D, L) is reduced from 8 to 6, but all other payoffs remain the same. Again, find all the pure- and mixed-strategy Nash equilibria. (c) Compare the mixed-strategy equilibria in parts (a) and (b). Did this worsening in one of player 2's payoffs change player 2's equilibrium mixed strategy? Did it change player l's? Give some intuition.
The following table contains the possible actions and payoffs of players 1 and 2. Player 1 U M D L 2,10 2,5 8,7 Player 2 C 5,2 11,8 8,4 R 5,4 2,9 8,3 This is a simultaneous move game. In a pure strategy Nash equilibrium of this game, Player 1 receives a payoff of ✓and player 2 receives a payoff of If, instead of playing simultaneously, player 2 moves first, then in the Nash equilibrium player 1 receives a payoff of ✓and player 2 receives a payoff of
1
Help me