mall Dynaco Jains Pynaco gains4. Synergy and Dynaco are the only two firms in a specific high - tech industry. They facethe following payoff matrix as they determine the size of their research budget:Synergy's DeeisionSmall BodgetLange BudgetSynergy gain$420MSymedgyDynaco insLargebudget Dynarogains $30MSynergySmall Dynaco JainsBudget Jains zeroDynae's2erogains $70mSynergyPynaco gainsgains #50MDecisiona. Does Synergy have a dominant strategy? Explain.b. Does Dynaco have a dominant strategy? Explain.c. Is there a Nash equilibrium for this scenario? Explain. (Hint: Look closely at thedefinition of Nash equilibrium.)

a) Dominant strategy is the one which the player always chooses ie irrespective of what other player…

4. Synergy and Dynaco are the only two firms in a specific high - tech industry. They face the following payoff matrix as they determine the size of their research budget: Synergy's Deision Lange Budget Srall bodget Symelgy Dynaco ins Large Synergy gain Dynmeo's budget Dynaro $420M Zero gains $707 lgains $30M Synergy Synergy gains Decision Smell Dynaco gains Pynaco gains $50M Budget Jains zero a. Does Synergy have a dominant strategy? Explain. b. Does Dynaco have a dominant strategy? Explain. c. Is there a Nash equilibrium for this scenario? Explain. (Hint: Look closely at the definition of Nash equilibrium.)

4. Synergy and Dynaco are the only two firms in a specific high - tech industry. They face the following payoff matrix as they determine the size of their research budget: Synergy's Deision Lange Budget Srall bodget Symelgy Dynaco ins Large Synergy gain Dynmeo's budget Dynaro $420M Zero gains $707 lgains $30M Synergy Synergy gains Decision Smell Dynaco gains Pynaco gains $50M Budget Jains zero a. Does Synergy have a dominant strategy? Explain. b. Does Dynaco have a dominant strategy? Explain. c. Is there a Nash equilibrium for this scenario? Explain. (Hint: Look closely at the definition of Nash equilibrium.)

Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305971493

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter17: Oligopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Sometimes oligopolies in the same industry are very different in size. Suppose we have a duopoly where one firm (Film A) is large and the other film (Film B) is small, as the prisoners dilemma box in Table 10.4 shows. Assuming that both films know the payoffs, what is the likely outcome in this case?
fnan421 WWord Gozden Geç r Gorunum Varc m Ne yaomak steci gnz soy evn 1) Two firms, X and Y, are planning to market their new products. Each firm can develop either TV or Laptop. Market research indicates that the resulting profits to each firm for the alternative strategies are given by the following payoff matrix: FIRM Y TV LAPTOP FIRM X TV 30, 30 50, 35 LAPTOP 40,70 20, 20 A) If both firms make their decisions at the same time and follow maximin (low-risk) strategies, what will the outcome be? B) Suppose both firms try to maximize profits, but Firm X has a head start in planning, and can commit first. Now what will the outcome be? What will the outcome be if Firm Y has a head start in planning and can commit first? I
Would it be wise for a brick-and-mortar retailer thatwants to stop showrooming to use wireless-jammingtechnologies to prevent people from using smartphonesinside its stores? Why or why not?
fnan421 Word Gozden Geçir Górunum Vard m e vaomak sted nz sOv eyin 1) Two firms, X and Y, are planning to market their new products. Each firm can develop either TV or Laptop. Market research indicates that the resulting profits to each firm for the alternative strategies are given by the following payoff matrix: FIRM Y TV LAPTOP FIRM X TV 30, 30 20, 35 LAPTOP 40,70 20, 20 A) What is the cooperative outcome? B) Which firm benefits most from the cooperative outcome? How much would that firm need to offer the other?
. When Chinese automakers began exporting cars, rather thanfocusing on developed nations in the West, they shippedautos to emerging markets in countries such as Algeria, Russia,Chile, and South Africa. In these markets, even used vehiclesfrom multinational manufacturers are relatively scarce—andrelatively expensive. The Chinese automakers, who prioritizelow cost rather than design or even safety, applied a penetration-pricing strategy. A woman in Santiago, Chile, who boughta new Chery S21 explained, “The price factor is fairly decisive.I paid $5,500 new and full. Toyota with similar features costsaround $12,000.” Why do you think Chinese automakerschose that pricing strategy? Do you think it was successful?As Chinese regulators pressure these manufacturers to maketheir cars safer, do you think they will be able to keep theirprices low compared with those of the international automakers? Why or why not?26
fnan421 Word Gözden Geçir Görünüm Varam V Ne yapmak isted ginzi soyieyin 2) Two firms, X and Y, are planning to market their new products. Each firm can develop TV, Laptop. Market research indicates that the resulting profits to each firm for the alternative strategies are given by the following payoff matrix: FIRM Y TV LAPTOP PHONE FIRM X TV 30, 30 50, 35 20, 50 LAPTOP 40,70 20, 20 50,80 PHONE 50,20 80,50 10,10 A) Find the Nash equilibria for this game, assuming that both firms make their decisions at the same time. (explain the decision step by step)i B) If each firm is risk averse and uses a maximin strategy, what will be the resulting equilibrium? (explain the decision step by step);
Kate and Alice are small-town ready-mix concrete duopolints. The market demand tunction is o- 20,000 - 200Pwhere Pis the price of a cubic yard of concrete and Ois the number of cubic yards demanded per year. Marginal cost is sa0 per cubic yard. Suppose Kate onters the market first and chooses her output belore Alice. What is the difference in Alice's profit when Kata enters the market tirst, compared to when they simultanecusly select ther outputa? When Kate entors the markat first, Alice's profit is $3,888.a0 lower. O When Kate enters the market fest, Alice's profit is 513,333.33 lower. O When Kate enters the market first, Alice's profit is $5,000 lower. O When Kate onters the market first, Alice's proft is $1.111.11 higher,
For example, the lower left cell of the matrix shows that if Full Coop advertises and Lucky Bird does not advertise, Full Coop will make a profit of $14 million, and Lucky Bird will make a profit of $3 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Lucky Bird and Full Coop are both profit- maximizing firms. If Lucky Bird chooses to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ advertise. million if Full Coop advertises and a profit of $ million if Full Coop does not If Lucky Bird chooses not to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ not advertise. million if Full Coop advertises and a profit of $ million if Full Coop does S If Full Coop advertises, Lucky Bird makes a higher profit if it chooses If Full Coop doesn't advertise, Lucky Bird makes a higher profit if it chooses Suppose that both firms start off by deciding not to advertise. If the firms act independently, what strategies will they end up choosing? Both firms will choose not to advertise. O Lucky Bird will choose not to…
fnan421 - Word Teri Gozden Geçir Görünum Yardım Ne yapmak istediğinizi soyleyin 2) Two firms, X and Y, are planning to market their new products. Each firm can develop TV, Laptop. Market research indicates that the resulting profits to each firm for the alternative strategies are given by the following payoff matrixi FIRM Y TV LAPTOP PHONE FIRM X TV 30, 30 50, 35 20, 50 LAPTOP 40,70 20, 20 50,80 PHONE 50,20 80,50 10,10 A) What will be the equilibrium if Firm X makes its selection first? If Firm Y goes first? ; (Ctrl) -
un x SCC PortalGuard -SCC Portal Lo X Assignments: Microec onomics Chapter 12 HW ect.mheducation.com/flow/connect.html Saved In the News: What's Behind Starbucks' Price Hike? The Coffee Company Will Raise Drink Prices in October, Even as Other Chains Crowd the Market with Similar (and Cheaper) Products Starting on Cctober 3, the prices on lattes, cappuccinos, drip coffee, and other drinks will go up 5 cents at company-operated stores in North America. Starbucks is also jacking up the price of its coffee beans by roughly 50 cents per pound, or an average of 3.9 percent. The timing is certainly odd. For a while now, Starbucks has been struggling with labor disputes. Rivals McDonald's, Dunkin' Donuts, and Canadian restaurant chain Tim Horton's are steaming into its turf.... A Confident Company If Starbucks were really worried about any of these issues, the last thing its senior execs would consider is a price hike. In fact, Starbucks' dominant market position gives it unique pricing…
Save Answer Consider two cigarette companies, PM Inc. and Brown Inc. If neither company advertises, the two companies spit the market and earn $60 million each. If they both advertise, they again split the market, but profits are lower by $20 million since each company must bear the cost of advertisirlg. Yet if one company advertises while the other does not, the one that advertises attracts customers from the other. In this case, the company that advertises earns $70 million while the company that does not advertise earns only $30 million. What will these two companies do if they behave as individual profit maximizers? Neither company will advertise, and PM Inc. earns $60. One company will advertise, the other will not. Brown Inc. earns $70. Both companies will advertise, and PM Inc. earns $40. Both companies will advertise, and PM Inc. earns $60.
Next Question Consider the network scheduling profit matrix Can the Pareto Critenon hep me networks sette on a single equibrum? Explain The Pareto Criterion Ne O A cannot help the networks sette on a singlo equibrum because the Wednesday Thursday networks cannot communicate OB. can help the networks settle on a single equibrum because the networks have dominant strateges Wednesday OC. cannot help the networks settie on a singie equilbnum because no Nash equilibria is better for both networks 40 Nebok 2 O D. can help the networks settle on a single equibrium because one Nash equilibrium has the highest joint payoffs O E. cannot help the networks settle on a single equilbrum because the networks must schedule simultaneously Thursdey