The image contains a decision-making exercise involving Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, where each country decides whether to produce a low output or a high output. The decisions and corresponding profits are shown in a payoff matrix.### Text DescriptionThe task asks about cooperative and Nash equilibria:**Cooperative Equilibrium:**1. **A.** Saudi Arabia produces a high output, Kuwait produces a low output.2. **B.** A cooperative equilibrium does not exist.3. **C.** Saudi Arabia produces a low output, Kuwait produces a high output.4. **D.** Saudi Arabia produces a low output, Kuwait produces a low output.5. **E.** Saudi Arabia produces a low output, Kuwait produces a low output. (Correct Answer)**Nash Equilibrium:**1. **A.** Saudi Arabia produces a high output, Kuwait produces a low output.2. **B.** Saudi Arabia produces a low output, Kuwait produces a low output.3. **C.** Saudi Arabia produces a high output, Kuwait produces a high output.4. **D.** Saudi Arabia produces a low output, Kuwait produces a high output.5. **E.** A Nash equilibrium does not exist.### Payoff Matrix DescriptionThe payoff matrix shows the potential outcomes for Saudi Arabia and Kuwait based on their production choices:- **Saudi Arabia:** - Low Output: Profit of $125 or $98 - High Output: Profit of $70 or $5- **Kuwait:** - Low Output: Profit of $8 or $5 - High Output: Profit of $13 or $8The matrix is divided into four quadrants:- Top Left: Saudi Arabia low, Kuwait low ($125, $8)- Top Right: Saudi Arabia low, Kuwait high ($75, $13)- Bottom Left: Saudi Arabia high, Kuwait low ($98, $5)- Bottom Right: Saudi Arabia high, Kuwait high ($70, $8)This structure helps explain how each country's choice affects both their own and the other's profits, allowing for analysis of strategic decisions.

Explanation: A cartel is termed for a group of firms that collude by agreeing to restrict output to increase prices and profits. A cooperative equilibrium is an equilibrium in a game in which players cooperate to increase their mutual payoff. In this case, if both countries Saudi Arabia and Kuwait collude and form a cartel, then their mutual payoff must be highest among the other alternatives. Following are the mutual payoffs: SA low; K low = 125 + 8 = $133 SA low; K high = 75 + 13 = $88 SA high; K low = 98 + 5 = $103 SA high ; K high = 70 + 8 = $78 => The cooperative equilibrium where joint profits are maximized occurs when each country produces a low output. It leads to a combined profit of $133, $125 from Saudi Arabia and $8 from Kuwait. Answer: E. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a low output and for Kuwait to produce a low output.When SA goes low, K chooses 13 as its higher than 8 When SA goes high, K chooses 8 as its higher than 5 When K goes Low, SA chooses 125 as its higher than 98 When K goes high, SA chooses 75 as its higher than 70 ---------- Kuwait ---------- Saudi Arabia Low High Low 125,8 75,13 High 98,5 70,8 => Thus, Nash equilibrium occurs when Saudi Arabia chooses low and Kuwait chooses high. Answer: D. The Nash equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a low output and for Kuwait to produce a high output.

Business

Economics

appose the two countries form a OA. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high output and Kuwait to produce a high output. O B. A cooperative equilibrium does not exist for this game. $125 $75 Low Output O C. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a low output and Kuwait to produce a high output. $8 $13 Saudi Arabia O D. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high output and Kuwait to produce a low output. $98 $70 E. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to broduce a low output and Kuwait to produce a low output. High Output $5 $8 What is the Nash equilibrium for this game? O A. The Nash equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high output and Kuwait to produce a low output. O B. The Nash equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a low output and Kuwait to produce a low output. O C. The Nash equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high output and Kuwait to produce a high output. S O D. The Nash equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a low output and Kuwait to produce a high output. S OE. A Nash equilibrium does not exist for this game. Clear all

appose the two countries form a OA. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high output and Kuwait to produce a high output. O B. A cooperative equilibrium does not exist for this game. $125 $75 Low Output O C. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a low output and Kuwait to produce a high output. $8 $13 Saudi Arabia O D. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high output and Kuwait to produce a low output. $98 $70 E. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to broduce a low output and Kuwait to produce a low output. High Output $5 $8 What is the Nash equilibrium for this game? O A. The Nash equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high output and Kuwait to produce a low output. O B. The Nash equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a low output and Kuwait to produce a low output. O C. The Nash equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high output and Kuwait to produce a high output. S O D. The Nash equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a low output and Kuwait to produce a high output. S OE. A Nash equilibrium does not exist for this game. Clear all

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

!!! I need help with drawing graphs too !!! 1. Export Subsidies (under perfect competition) in a small countrya. For a small country, is the logic for why export subsidies provide negative gainsdifferent than the logic for why import tariffs provide negative gains? Explain2. Airbus and Boeing problem again. Suppose Boeing is more efficient at making airplanesthan Airbus. Starting from slide 33, Figure 10-9, let’s change the payoff matrix, so that if Boeingand Airbus both produce, Boeing gets +5, instead of -5. And, if Boeing produces, and Airbusdoes not produce, Boeing gets +125 instead of +100. Will there be a unique equilibrium in thiscase?
What is the payoff for each firm in this simultaneous game? a. Both firms will earn 0 b. Firm A will earn 50 and firm B will earn -10 c. Firm A will earn -10 and firm B will earn 50 O d. Both firms will earn 25 Refer to the following normal form game of price competition for questions 85 - 88. Firm A Low Price High Price Firm B Low Price 0,0 -10, 50 High Price 50, -10 25, 25
wine 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 cloth Portugal PPF CPF wine SERESSAD 90 Click Save and Submit to save and submit. Click Save All Answers to save all answers. 80 70 60 50 40- 30+ 20 O (a) Portugal has the absolute advantage and England has the comparative advantage Ⓒ (b) England has the absolute advantage and Portugal has the comparative advantage O (c) Neither country has the comparative advantage O (d) Neither country has the absolute advantage O (d) cannot tell from this diagram England PPF 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 cloth 12. If Portugal has a total of 180 man-hours of resources available for production, while England has only 60, which country has the absolute advantage, and which country has the comparative advantage in wine? CPF MacBook Air Save All A
Part 1 Consider the following game between two early settlers in the United States: Settler 2 Move West Move North Move West 60, 110 100, 140 Settler 1 90, 100 Move North 70, 130 Which of the following is true? Choose one: O A. Both settlers have the same dominant strategy: move west. O B. Neither settler has a dominant strategy. O C.Only settler 1 has a dominant strategy. O D. Both settlers have the same dominant strategy: move north. O E. Only settler 2 has a dominant strategy. Part 2 Considering the payoff matrixin the game above, Choose one: O A there are two equilibria, when one moves west the other moves north (and vice versa). O B. there are no equilibria. O C there is one equilibrium, for both to move north. O D. there is one equilibrium, for both to move west.
A large share of intrafirm trade suggests O There are increasing returns to trade in the industry. O The industry produces a highly differentiated, knowledge-intensive product. O Offshoring is important in the industry. O Strong comparative advantages.
Suppose Tom, Mary and Jill have apartments in the same building, and installing a security system for their building costs $750. Tom is willing to pay $100 for the security system, Mary is willing to pay $300 and Jill is willing to pay $300. If the three of them hold a vote on whether to install the system and split the cost equally, how will the vote go? O Nobody would vote yes O Only one would vote yes Only two would vote yes All three would vote yes
QUESTION 8 Question 3b- 5 Trade triangles of the partner and the home country in a two-country analysis are congruent because: O Trading prices (Px/Py) are different for each country. O Exports of the home country are imports of the parther country. O Trading prices (Px/Py) are lower for each country. The general equilibrium condition is met by both countries.
In the game below, there are two equilibriums: both players play conserve or both players play plunder. If the game is repeated multiple times, players can maintain equilibrium in which conserve is played if: Player 2 Player 1 Conserve Plunder Select one: a. Conserve 100, 100 50,-100 Plunder -100, 50 0,0 Game is repeated many times and discount rates are high O b. Game is repeated few times and discount rates are low O c. Game is repeated few times and discount rates are high O d. Game is repeated many times and discount rates are low
True/False - One of the primary reasons that President Clinton provided a loan guarantee for Mexico worth $20 billion is because Mexico was an important trading partner. O True O False Show Transcribed Text Who benefits from an import tariff? the government O everyone O consumers O foreign producers Show Transcribed Text O True 3 True/False - Tariffs are generally pro-consumer and anti-producer. False Ĉ
Enter The payoffs are represented in the game tree illustrated in the figure to the right What is the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium? -(450,125 Rival Small O A. The game does not have a Nash equililbrium. O B. The Nash equilibrium is for the incumbent produce the large quantity and for the rival to only enter if the (900,0) Don't enter incumbent produces the small quantity. Incumbent Enter OC. The Nash equilibrium is for the incumbent to produce the large quantity and for the rival to not enter regardless of the incumbent's quantity. (400, -2 Large Rival O D. The Nash equilibrium is for the incumbent produce the small quantity and for the rival to only enter if the incumbent produces the small quantity. (800,0) Don't enter O E. The Nash equilibrium is for the incumbent to produce the large quantity and for the rival to enter regardless of the incumbent's quantity.
6) Consider the following signaling game: 20, 5 0,0 10, -10 -10,0 Left Left Right Right Player 2 Player 2 1-a Up Up Nature Player 1-A Player 1-B Туре А — 50% Туре В — 50% Down Down Player 2 1-B Player 2 Left Right Left Right 10,5 0,0 5, -10 0,0 Let's see if it has a pooling equilibrium. Follow the following steps: a. Specify strategies of a possible pooling equilibrium b. Determine player 2’s on-path beliefs for the belief probabilities a and ß as appropriate. You can infer these beliefs from what we know about beliefs in pooling equilibria, and do not have fully calculate them. c. Check whether either player wants to deviate. Is there a pooling equilibrium? d. Determine the off-path beliefs that make the equilibrium hold.
not use ai please