3: Alex and Aaron are political rivals, and Aaron has challenged Alex to a duel. Alex must choose whether to accept the challenge or decline, and Aaron must choose whether to shoot Alex or miss (even if he accepts, Alex's religious convictions won't allow him to shoot Aaron). If Alex declines, he lives but Aaron gets the satisfaction of making Alex look like a coward. If Alex accepts and Aaron misses, both men get to move on with their lives but Alex gets the benefit of defending his honor. If Alex accepts and Aaron shoots, Alex will die but Aaron would have also killed his own political career. The payoffs are represented in the payoff matrix below: Aaron Shoot Miss Ассept 0,0 2,1 Alex Decline 1,2 1,2 (1) What are the pure-strategy Nash equilibria of this game? (2) Now or decline the challenge to a duel, and if Alex accepts Aaron then chooses suppose that the game is sequential. Alex first chooses whether to accept whether to shoot Alex or miss. In this version of the game, does one of the Nash equilibria seem more rational than the other(s)? Why is that? Explain your reasoning.

3: Alex and Aaron are political rivals, and Aaron has challenged Alex to a duel. Alex must choose whether to accept the challenge or decline, and Aaron must choose whether to shoot Alex or miss (even if he accepts, Alex's religious convictions won't allow him to shoot Aaron). If Alex declines, he lives but Aaron gets the satisfaction of making Alex look like a coward. If Alex accepts and Aaron misses, both men get to move on with their lives but Alex gets the benefit of defending his honor. If Alex accepts and Aaron shoots, Alex will die but Aaron would have also killed his own political career. The payoffs are represented in the payoff matrix below: Aaron Shoot Miss Ассept 0,0 2,1 Alex Decline 1,2 1,2 (1) What are the pure-strategy Nash equilibria of this game? (2) Now or decline the challenge to a duel, and if Alex accepts Aaron then chooses suppose that the game is sequential. Alex first chooses whether to accept whether to shoot Alex or miss. In this version of the game, does one of the Nash equilibria seem more rational than the other(s)? Why is that? Explain your reasoning.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Problem 5 Two countries are currently facing the COVID threat when trading with each other. Such countries are currently considering three options: keeping the activities open, limiting the opening hours, or closing down. The following table shows the expected payoffs in billions of dollars. For example, if Country 1 will adopt “Limited opening" and Country 2 will keep the activities open, Country 1 will have a payoff of 4 billion dollars, while Country 2 will have a payoff of 8 billion dollars. Country 2 Оpen Limited opening Closed Оpen 5;5 8;4 10;0 Country 1 Limited opening 4;8 7;7 5;0 Closed 0;10 0;5 0;0 Question 5.1. In case of a simultaneous decision (simultaneous game), identify eventual equilibria, and strategies in this game for the two countries. Give a brief economic explanation of your results. Question 5.2. In case one of the two countries would choose first (sequential game), identify the two outcomes of the game, and eventual first/second mover advantages.
Suppose Antonio and Trinity are playing a game that requires both to simultaneously choose an action: Up or Down. The payoff matrix that follows shows the earnings of each person as a function of both of their choices. For example, the upper-right cell shows that if Antonio chooses Up and Trinity chooses Down, Antonio will receive a payoff of 7 and Trinity will receive a payoff of 5. Trinity Up Down Up 4,8 7,5 Antonio Down 3,2 5,6 In this game, the only dominant strategy is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Antonio chooses, and Trinity chooses Grade It Now Save & Continue Continue without saving @ 2 F2 #3 80 Q F3 MacBook Air 44 F7 Dll F8 44 F10 74 $ 4 05 Λ & % 5 6 7 8 * 0 Q W E R T Y U 1 A N S X 9 0 -O O D F G H J K L on را H command C > B N M Λ - - P [ H Λ command opti
Player 1 and player 2 are playing a simultaneous-move one-shot game, where player 1 can move "up" or "down" and player 2 can move "left" or "right" The payoffs for the game are shown in the payoff matrix. The first number of each cell represents player 1's payoff, and the second number is player 2's. Use the matrix to answer the questions below. Player 1 2nd attempt Part 1 Part 2 Which of the following outcomes is a pure strategy Nash equilibrium of this game? P = (1-P) = Up Down Part 3 9= Left -16, -18 -20,7 Choose one or more: A. There is no pure strategy Nash equilibrium in this game. OB. Player 1 plays up; player 2 plays left. OC. Player 1 plays up; player 2 plays right. □ D. Player 1 plays down; player 2 plays left. O E. Player 1 plays down; player 2 plays right. Player 2 Suppose player 1 assigns probability p to playing up and (1 - p) to playing down. What do p and (1-p) have to be such that player 2 is indifferent between playing left and right? Round all answers to two decimal…
2. Consider the following "centipede game." The game starts with player 1 choosing be- tween terminate (T) and continue (C). If player 1 chooses C, the game proceeds with player 2 choosing between terminate (t) and continue (c). The two players choose be- tween terminate and continue in turn if the other player chooses continue until the terminal nodes with (player l's payoff, player 2's payoff) are reached as shown below. TTTT Player 1 Player 2 Player 1 Player 2 (3, 3) t (1, 1) (0, 3) (2, 2) (1, 4) (a) List all possible strategies of each player. (b) Transform the game tree into a normal-form matrix representation. (c) Find all pure-strategy Nash equilibria. (d) Find the unique pure-strategy subgame-perfect equilibrium.
two timber companies, Alpha and Beta, have to decide whether to harvest timber from the North Hill or the South Hill and then sell the timbers in the same market. If both harvest from North Hill, each company can harvest 100 tons of timber. If both companies harvest from South Hill, each company can harvest 150 tons of timber. If one company harvests from North Hill and the other harvests from South Hill, the company at North Hill can harvest 150 tons of timber while the company at South Hill can harvest 250 tons of timber. The price of timber is dependent on the total supply of timber in the market. The price will be $180 per ton if the total supply is 200 tons, $150 per ton if the total supply is 300 tons and $100 per ton if the total supply is 400 tons. To both companies, the cost of harvesting in North Hill is $5,000 and the cost of harvesting in South Hill is $10,000. (a) If Alpha and Beta were to make a decision simultaneously, construct the payoff matrix in terms of profit for…
John and Paul are walking in the woods one day when suddenly an angry bear emerges from the underbrush. They each can do one of two things: run away or stand and fight. If one of them runs away and the other fights, then the one who ran will get away unharmed (payoff of 0) while the one who fights will be killed (payoff -200). If they both run, then the bear will chase down one of them and eat them to death but the other one will get away unharmed. Assuming they don't know which one will escape we will call this a payoff of -100 for both. If they BOTH fight, then they will successfully drive off the bear but they may be injured in the process (payoff -20). Construct a payoff matrix for this game and identify the pure strategy Nash equilibrium. (Indicate it with words not with a circle!)
There are two oil producers, Saudi Arabia and Iran (these are countries which we are treating as players in this example). The market price will be $60/barrel if the total volume of sales is 9 million barrels daily, $50 if the total volume of sales is 11 million barrels daily, and $35 if the total volume of sales is 13 million barrels daily. Saudi Arabia has two strategies; either produce 8 million barrels daily or 6 million. Iran has two strategies; either produce 3 million barrels daily or 5 million. Assume for simplicity that marginal cost of production is zero for both countries. Here is the normal form representation of this game (where Saudi Arabia and Iran are players, they can choose strategies over what quantity to produce and they face payoffs in terms of profits). Note that the following paragraph is simply an explanation of this representation of the game. If you are already comfortable with the structure, feel free to skip to the questions below the horizontal line…
Suppose that Jason and Chad each are thinking of opening up a diet coke stand on the fourth floor of this building. Suppose that potential customers are evenly spaced on a distance that is normalized to 1. Customers will buy a diet coke from whichever stand requires the least walking. If they are the same distance the customer will flip a coin. This is depicted below. 1/4 1/2 3/4 Suppose that Jason and Chad are simultaneously choosing the location of their stands, what is the Nash Equilibrium location? a. One of them puts a stand at 3/4 and the other puts a stand at 1/4 b. Chad and Jason put their stands right next to each other at 1/2 c. One of them puts a stand at 0 and the other puts a stand at 1 d. There is no Nash Equilibrium
“To be or not to be, that is the question.” Imagine that in answering this question Hamlet had the following data to consider. Hamlet must choose either “To Be” or “Not to Be.” If Hamlet chooses “To Be” then his enemy the King will make a decision to either “Kill” Hamlet or let him “Live.” If Hamlet is killed by the King his payoff in this game is 200 since he will have been killed by the King who is his uncle and who also killed Hamlet’s father, the King’s brother, who was the prior king. If the King decides to let Hamlet Live then Hamlet will be able to avenge his father’s death and his payoff will be +300. Hamlet also considers suicide an option but given the uncertainty of the afterlife if he chooses not to be then his payoff is +100 since his doesn’t what the afterlife holds for one who kills himself. Draw the complete game tree for this situation. Be sure to accurately label the tree and include the payoffs. Assume Hamlet will choose the course of action that offers the highest…
4. Sonia the Terrible lands her ship and crew of scurvy-pirate raiders onto a foreign beach. Up on the headland is a village, led by Jen the Brave. At this point, Sonia has a choice: she can SLASH her water barrels, eliminating her water supplies; or she can NOT SLASH, which keeps her water supplies completely intact. Having seen the action taken by Sonia, Jen can choose to CHARGE or to WAIT. The payoffs are as follows: if Sonia the Terrible chooses to SLASH and Jen CHARGES, the payoffs are (100, 20) to Sonia and Jen, respectively. If Sonia SLASHES and Jen WAITS, the payoffs are (10, 30). On the other hand, if Sonia chooses to NOT SLASH and Jen CHARGES, the payoff is (20, 15). If Sonia opts to NOT SLASH and Jen chooses to WAIT, the payoffs are (40, 10), respectively. What is the subgame perfect (or credible) equilibrium outcome? a. Sonia the Terrible chooses to SLASH; Jen the Brave chooses to CHARGE b. Sonia the Terrible chooses to NOT SLASH; Jen the Brave chooses to WAIT c. Sonia the…
3. Suppose we play the following game. I give you $100 for your initial bankroll. At each time n, you decide how much of your current wealth to bet. You cannot borrow money. You can only play with the money I gave you in the beginning or any money that you have won so far. The game is simple. At each time n ≥ 1, you decide the amount to bet. I will roll a fair die. If the die comes up 1,2,3,..., or 5, you win; if the die comes up 6, then you lose. IOW, if you bet $10 on the first roll, you will either have $90 or $110 after the first roll. (a) Suppose you wish to maximize your profit on the first roll. How much should you bet? (Most of you will get this wrong.) (b) What is the expected profit on the first roll if your bet is b with 0 ≤ b ≤ 100? (c) Suppose you wish to maximize your expected profit on the first roll. How much should you bet? (d) Suppose you wish to maximize your expected profit betting on the nth roll. How much of your current wealth do you bet? (e) Let X₂, be your…
1. Consider a game of chicken: two players approach a narrow bridge with room only for one, and each chooses either to go through and hope the other guy backs off (call this action H, for "hawk"), or backs off to let the other go through (call this action D, for "dove"). If both players are normal, then each gets a payoff of -1 from a collision (i.e. if both choose H), 1 if they choose H against D, 0 if they choose D (regardless of what the other player chooses). Now perturb the game as follows: there is a chance p > 0 that P2 is a “violent type", who gets 1 from playing H regardless of Pl's action, and -1 from playing D, again regardless of P1's action. (a) Illustrate the game tree corresponding to the Harsanyi transformation of this game (i.e. the dynamic game of imperfect information in which nature moves first). (b) Illustrate the extended game (i.e. the normal form game corresponding to your game tree in part (a)). (c) Find all values of p for which there is a BNE in which P1…