2. The economy of Newland is in short-run macroeconomic equilibrium. The current real output is $400 billion, and the full employment output is $500 billion. The marginal propensity to consume is 0.8. (a) Is the economy experiencing a recessionary output gap or an inflationary output gap? Explain. (b) Assume Newland's government is considering taking action to close the output gap identified in part (a). (i) Calculate the minimum change and indicate the direction of change in government spending required to shift the aggregate demand curve to close the output gap. Show your work. (ii) If instead Newland's government changes income taxes without changing government spending, calculate the minimum change and indicate the direction of change in income taxes required to shift the aggregate demand curve to close the output gap. Show your work. (c) Which fiscal policy action, changing government spending or changing income taxes, is more effective in closing the output gap? Explain. (d) Assume instead Newland's government decides not to take any policy action. Will short-run aggregate supply increase, decrease, or stay the same in the long run? Explain.

2. The economy of Newland is in short-run macroeconomic equilibrium. The current real output is $400 billion, and the full employment output is $500 billion. The marginal propensity to consume is 0.8. (a) Is the economy experiencing a recessionary output gap or an inflationary output gap? Explain. (b) Assume Newland's government is considering taking action to close the output gap identified in part (a). (i) Calculate the minimum change and indicate the direction of change in government spending required to shift the aggregate demand curve to close the output gap. Show your work. (ii) If instead Newland's government changes income taxes without changing government spending, calculate the minimum change and indicate the direction of change in income taxes required to shift the aggregate demand curve to close the output gap. Show your work. (c) Which fiscal policy action, changing government spending or changing income taxes, is more effective in closing the output gap? Explain. (d) Assume instead Newland's government decides not to take any policy action. Will short-run aggregate supply increase, decrease, or stay the same in the long run? Explain.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

> A Moving to another question will save this response. 8 > » Question 18 Answer The economy is in a recession. The government enacts a policy to increase the real GDP by $10 billion. The MPS is 0.2. Assuming that the aggregate supply curve is horizontal across the range of GDP being considered, by how much should the government change spending or taxes in order to achieve its objective? Show your calculations., For the toolbar, press ALT+F10 (PC) or ALT+FN+F10 (Mac). E vE v 面 A v ... BIUS Paragraph Times New R. v 12pt POWERED BY TINY >
I. Taiwan has an income tax rate, t1, of 28% and a Marginal Propensity to Save (MPS) of 0.4. It is in Eqm but is currently suffering from an "inflationary gap" of $350 m. (that is, Eqm Y>Y full employment, FE, aka Yn). Make the necessary calculations for the to policy that should be instituted. Provide the full name of this policy. II. Most economists believe that tariffs are not the best way to reduce the US trade-balance deficit -- the fact that US IM>US X. (Macro problems should be fixed with macro tools and tariffs are a micro tool.) Derive the identity for Y from the expenditure approach for an open economy to discuss what it means when a country is running a trade-balance deficit and whether it is an economic "good" or "bad." Then derive the twin-deficit identity and use it to explain why the US runs trade-balance deficits and what can be done, if anything, to reduce them. Make all your assumptions clear.
please solve parts c and d
5) What factors will shift the aggregate demand curve for a given level of real domestic income?
A) Discuss, with examples, factors or events that might shift the short run aggregate supply curve. B) Imagine an economy is in long run equilibrium. Now suppose that firms experience an increase in their cost of production (say, due to a natural disaster). i. Explain, with graphs, the macroeconomic impact of such an increase in production costs. ii. Describe how policymakers could use fiscal policy to counteract the effects of increased cost of production.
Question 13 Include correctly labeled diagrams, if useful or required, In explaining your answers. A correctly labeled dl question prompts you to 'Calculate," you must show how you arrived at your final answer. Vander's economy is in short-run equilibrium with an inflationary gap of $360 billion, and the marginal propensity to save 0.1. the expected inflation rate is 2% and the natural rate of unemployment is 4% (b) Assume the government takes no policy action with regard to the state of Vander's economy. (i) What will happen to the actual rate of unemployment in the long run? Explain.(it) The flow will the long-run adjustment process be represented in the Phillips curve model? Explain. (c) Assume that instead of waiting for the long-run adjustment, the government of Vander is considering USA fiscal policy to addresses the inflationary gap of 360 billion(ii) How will the effect of the government's action in part (c)(i) be represented in the Phillips curve model(Ili) If the government…
Refer to the following figure 1. For this economy, if the actual price level exceeds theexpected price level, how much output will the economyproduce in the short-run? A)$17 trillionB)$17.2 trillionC)$16.7 trillionD) Both A and C.2. Given the situation in part (a), this economy wouldexperience A) a recessionary gap of $0.3 trillionB) an expansionary gap of $0.2 trillionC) neither a recessionary gap nor an expansionary gap.D) an expansionary gap of $17.2 trillion. 3. Given the situation in part (a), in this economy (circlethe letter representing the right answer below)A) the actual rate of unemployment would be less than thenatural rate of unemployment.B) the actual rate of unemployment would be above the naturalrate of unemployment.C) the actual rate of unemployment would be equal to thenatural rate of unemployment.D)none of the above.4. In this economy, given the situation in part (a), in thelong-run (circle the letter representing the right answerbelow)A) the nominal wage…
2. The economy is currently in the long-run macroeconomic equilibrium. a) Using an appropriately labelled graph, show the economy's current state. b) Suppose, the government decides to increase income taxes. What kind of policy did the government take? On the same diagram as a) show the effect of this policy in the short run and explain.
3
7. Supply-side effects Consider a fictional economy that is operating at its long-run equilibrium. The following graph shows the aggregate demand curve (AD) and short-run aggregate supply curve (SRAS) for the economy. The long-run aggregate supply curve (LRAS) is represented by a vertical line at $6 trillion. The economy is initially producing at potential output. Suppose that fiscal authorities decide to decrease marginal tax rates. Assume that this change in marginal tax rates is perceived as a long-term change. Shift the appropriate curves to illustrate the supply-side view of the fiscal policy effect on output and the price level. (? 120 LRAS SRAS 100 AD 80 SRAS LRAS 40 AD 20 2 4 6 8 10 12 QUANTITY OF OUTPUT (Trillions of dollars) PRICE LEVEL
Question 4. Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the economy of Finland is in a recession. The government is planning to increase government spending by 30 billion euros. Assume that marginal propensity to consume is 0.75 and there is no crowding-out effect. Define this policy measure and its consequences. Quantify the total effect of an increase in government spending on aggregate demand. Compare if the tax cut of 30 billion euros would lead to the same result. Discuss how can the crowding-out effect change the consequences of an increase in government spending.
5. Supply-side effects Consider a fictional economy that is operating at its long-run equilibrium. The following graph shows the aggregate demand (AD) curve and short-run aggregate supply (AS) curve for the economy. The long-run aggregate supply curve is represented by a vertical line at the potential GDP level of $6 trillion. The economy is initially producing at potential GDP. Suppose that fiscal authorities decide to decrease marginal tax rates. Assume that this change in marginal tax rates is perceived as a long-term change. Shift the appropriate curves to illustrate the supply-side view of the fiscal policy effect on output and the price level. Note: Select and drag one or both of the curves to the desired position. Curves will snap into position, so if you try to move a curve and it snaps back to its original position, just drag it a little farther 8 100 8 PRICE LEVEL 8 9 8 True Potential GDP O False AS AD 10 QUANTITY OF OUTPUT (Trillions of dollars) 12 True or False! Supply side…