(?)120SRAS100AD80SRAS60LRAS40AD20100200300400500600REAL GDP (Index numbers)This economy's output ispotential output. To restore the economy to its potential, the government couldv fiscal policy.useShift either the AD curve or the SRAS curve to illustrate the changes consistent with the chosen government policy.Suppose that the marginal propensity to consume in this economy is 0.60. Assume, for simplicity, that there are no taxes or other factors that couldalter the multiplier effect of a change in government expenditures.The economy's expenditure multiplier iswhich means that the government must alter its expenditures byto restore outputto potential output.PRICE LEVEL (Billions of dollars) 5. Fiscal policy in the AD-AS model and the multiplier effectThe following graph shows a hypothetical economy that uses the dollar as its currency. The economy is in short-run equilibrium at an output level of300 billion and a price level of 60. Suppose that the economy's potential output is $400 billion.Use the purple line (diamond symbols) to plot the long-run aggregate supply (LRAS) curve on the graph.(?)120SRAS100AD80SRAS60LRAS40AD20100200300400500600REAL GDP (Index numbers)This economy's output ispotential output. To restore the economy to its potential, the government couldusefiscal policy.PRICE LEVEL (Billions of dollars)

The short run equilibrium is where the aggregate demand and short run aggregate supply curve…

This economy's output is potential output. To restore the economy to its potential, the government could use fiscal policy. Shift either the AD curve or the SRAS curve to illustrate the changes consistent with the chosen government policy. Suppose that the marginal propensity to consume in this economy is 0.60. Assume, for simplicity, that there are no taxes or other factors that could alter the multiplier effect of a change in government expenditures. The economy's expenditure multiplier is , which means that the government must alter its expenditures by to restore output to potential output.

This economy's output is potential output. To restore the economy to its potential, the government could use fiscal policy. Shift either the AD curve or the SRAS curve to illustrate the changes consistent with the chosen government policy. Suppose that the marginal propensity to consume in this economy is 0.60. Assume, for simplicity, that there are no taxes or other factors that could alter the multiplier effect of a change in government expenditures. The economy's expenditure multiplier is , which means that the government must alter its expenditures by to restore output to potential output.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose actual real GDP is $7.87 trillion, potential real GDP is $14.36 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.61. If we ignore price effects, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its lump sum taxes to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)
Suppose actual real GDP is $9.06 trillion, potential real GDP is $6.42 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.59. If we ignore price effects, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its lump sum taxes to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)
Suppose the economy is described by the following: C = 50+ 0.8 (Y-T) lp = 200 G = 100 T = 100 What is the multiplier for government spending in this economy? 10 100 2.5 1.25 5
Assume a model where marginal propensity to save is 0.2, the marginal propensity to import is 0.1 and the marginal income tax rate is 0.2. What is the size of the expenditure multiplier?
Suppose you are given the following information. Autonomous spending is at $3000, government spending is at $4000, investment spending is at $2000, net exports are $1000, taxes are set at $3000 and the mpc is .8 or 80%. What is the equilibrium level of output? What would happen if the government tried to balance the budget? The other day, it was announced the consumer confidence was up last month. This sounded good news bells for firms. Why? What would be affected in our equation above? Why would it matter? Suppose the government tried to balance the budget my cutting spending, what would be the equilibrium level of output? If there is “crowding out (or in)”, what else might change in your equation? What impact would that have
Assume that the Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) is 0.8. If the multiplier effect is taken into account, the reduction in government expenditure by $ 200 million will shift the overall demand process to the correct order below. A) right, $1,000 million B) left, $ 200 million C) left, $160 million D) left, $1,000 million E) right, $ 160 million
Given C=500 + 0.80Y, I = 100, G=100, and the government decides to finance G by also increasing taxes T=100, how much is the new equilibrium level of output with the tax? The government decides to also impose an income tax tY=0.25Y. How much is the new equilibrium level of output with the income tax? and how much is the value of the expenditure multiplier?
Please answer the following questions based on the given information: a = 50, MPC -0.8, 1-100, G-200, EX-100, IM- 50 (where a is the autonomous spending. MPC is the marginal propensity to consume, I is the investment, G is the government spending, EX is the export, and IM is the import) 1) What is the equilibrium level of output (income), Ye, in this economy? 50 Agg Expenditure C+I+G+NX- M+I+G+NX p Agg Expenditure Income (Real GOP) 2) Suppose the Ye (actual GDP) that you derived from the previous question is lower than the potential GDP level. Calculate the G' value to find how much the government spending is required to reach the potential GDP at 2,400? G 48 degree P" => ↑ C++G+Nxx Aus GDP AET-CH-GNX AEZ-C+I+G+NX Y, GDP)
Q)Imagine the government wants to conduct an expansionary fiscal policy and needs an expert to answer the following questions before making a decision. a) Calculate the value of the multiplier effect if the marginal propensity to consume is 0.8. b) Calculate the increase in GDP which will occur, if the government increases its government spending by $600 million and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.8.
Suppose the marginal propensity to consume is equal to 0.4. If the government lowers tax rates and tax revenue falls by $50 billion, then disposable income will increase by________ billion and consumption spending will initially increase by ________ billion (before the multiplier effect kicks in).
What is marginal propensity to consume and marginal tax rate? Why is the gov expenditure multiplier is 4.8?
Suppose actual real GDP is $5.49 trillion, potential real GDP is $12.48 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.76. If we ignore price effects, and if the government already decided to increase its spending by $1.07 trillion, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its lump sum taxes to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)