12:35 bath-prod-sss1.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com 94 3. Question You are tasked with estimating the time preferences for chocolate and biscuit consumption of two subjects, Adam and Beth. Both subjects have the same instantaneous utility function for the consumption of x units of chocolate and y biscuits at a given day: u(x, y) = x¹/2 . y¹/2¸ (a) Today (Monday), Adam tells you he is indifferent between consuming 1 piece of chocolate with 9 biscuits today (Monday) and 4 pieces of each, chocolate and biscuits, tomorrow (Tuesday). Determine the exponential discount factor ♪ that is implied by Adam's statement. (b) Today (Monday), Adam also tells you that he is indifferent between con- suming 9 pieces of chocolate with 1 biscuit tomorrow (Tuesday) and 3 pieces of chocolate with 3 biscuits in two days (Wednesday). What is the exponential discount factor & that is implied by this statement? Can the exponential discounting model explain both of Adam's statements from questions (a) and (b) together? (c) In what sense can the hyperbolic discounting model be a better fit to explain Adam's preferences? Derive the implied discount factors (ẞ, 5) that are consistent with the indifference relations in (a) and (b). (d) Considering Beth, she predicts today (Monday) that when asked tomor- row she will be indifferent between consuming 2 pieces of chocolate with 8 biscuits on Tuesday and 5 pieces of chocolate with 5 biscuits on Wednes- day. Moreover, she predicts today when asked tomorrow that she will be indifferent between 4 pieces of chocolate with 4 biscuits on Tuesday and 4 pieces of chocolate with 9 biscuits on Thursday. Determine whether Beth is an exponential, naive or sophisticated hyperbolic discounter and determine the corresponding discount factors. (e) Suppose that it is possible to perfectly monitor Beth's daily chocolate and biscuit intake. You offer the following contract to Beth: Whenever she eats more than an amount x of chocolate and biscuits that she can specify freely today, a fine of 100 GBP is subtracted from her account (the monetary equivalent of consuming any amount of chocolate and biscuits is always lower than the fine). Is she going to accept the contract on Monday? Would she regret on Tuesday having accepted the contracted on Monday? Justify your responses based on your answer to question (d). Page 4 of 5 ES30037

Principles of Economics 2e
2nd Edition
ISBN:9781947172364
Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
ChapterA: The Use Of Mathematics In Principles Of Economics
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ: Exercise A1 Name three kinds of graphs and briefly state when is most appropriate to use each type...
icon
Related questions
Question

Answer all

12:35
bath-prod-sss1.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com
94
3. Question
You are tasked with estimating the time preferences for chocolate and biscuit
consumption of two subjects, Adam and Beth. Both subjects have the same
instantaneous utility function for the consumption of x units of chocolate and
y biscuits at a given day: u(x, y) = x¹/2 . y¹/2¸
(a) Today (Monday), Adam tells you he is indifferent between consuming 1
piece of chocolate with 9 biscuits today (Monday) and 4 pieces of each,
chocolate and biscuits, tomorrow (Tuesday). Determine the exponential
discount factor ♪ that is implied by Adam's statement.
(b) Today (Monday), Adam also tells you that he is indifferent between con-
suming 9 pieces of chocolate with 1 biscuit tomorrow (Tuesday) and 3
pieces of chocolate with 3 biscuits in two days (Wednesday). What is the
exponential discount factor & that is implied by this statement? Can the
exponential discounting model explain both of Adam's statements from
questions (a) and (b) together?
(c) In what sense can the hyperbolic discounting model be a better fit to
explain Adam's preferences? Derive the implied discount factors (ẞ, 5)
that are consistent with the indifference relations in (a) and (b).
(d) Considering Beth, she predicts today (Monday) that when asked tomor-
row she will be indifferent between consuming 2 pieces of chocolate with 8
biscuits on Tuesday and 5 pieces of chocolate with 5 biscuits on Wednes-
day. Moreover, she predicts today when asked tomorrow that she will be
indifferent between 4 pieces of chocolate with 4 biscuits on Tuesday and
4 pieces of chocolate with 9 biscuits on Thursday. Determine whether
Beth is an exponential, naive or sophisticated hyperbolic discounter and
determine the corresponding discount factors.
(e) Suppose that it is possible to perfectly monitor Beth's daily chocolate
and biscuit intake. You offer the following contract to Beth: Whenever
she eats more than an amount x of chocolate and biscuits that she can
specify freely today, a fine of 100 GBP is subtracted from her account (the
monetary equivalent of consuming any amount of chocolate and biscuits
is always lower than the fine). Is she going to accept the contract on
Monday? Would she regret on Tuesday having accepted the contracted
on Monday? Justify your responses based on your answer to question (d).
Page 4 of 5
ES30037
Transcribed Image Text:12:35 bath-prod-sss1.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com 94 3. Question You are tasked with estimating the time preferences for chocolate and biscuit consumption of two subjects, Adam and Beth. Both subjects have the same instantaneous utility function for the consumption of x units of chocolate and y biscuits at a given day: u(x, y) = x¹/2 . y¹/2¸ (a) Today (Monday), Adam tells you he is indifferent between consuming 1 piece of chocolate with 9 biscuits today (Monday) and 4 pieces of each, chocolate and biscuits, tomorrow (Tuesday). Determine the exponential discount factor ♪ that is implied by Adam's statement. (b) Today (Monday), Adam also tells you that he is indifferent between con- suming 9 pieces of chocolate with 1 biscuit tomorrow (Tuesday) and 3 pieces of chocolate with 3 biscuits in two days (Wednesday). What is the exponential discount factor & that is implied by this statement? Can the exponential discounting model explain both of Adam's statements from questions (a) and (b) together? (c) In what sense can the hyperbolic discounting model be a better fit to explain Adam's preferences? Derive the implied discount factors (ẞ, 5) that are consistent with the indifference relations in (a) and (b). (d) Considering Beth, she predicts today (Monday) that when asked tomor- row she will be indifferent between consuming 2 pieces of chocolate with 8 biscuits on Tuesday and 5 pieces of chocolate with 5 biscuits on Wednes- day. Moreover, she predicts today when asked tomorrow that she will be indifferent between 4 pieces of chocolate with 4 biscuits on Tuesday and 4 pieces of chocolate with 9 biscuits on Thursday. Determine whether Beth is an exponential, naive or sophisticated hyperbolic discounter and determine the corresponding discount factors. (e) Suppose that it is possible to perfectly monitor Beth's daily chocolate and biscuit intake. You offer the following contract to Beth: Whenever she eats more than an amount x of chocolate and biscuits that she can specify freely today, a fine of 100 GBP is subtracted from her account (the monetary equivalent of consuming any amount of chocolate and biscuits is always lower than the fine). Is she going to accept the contract on Monday? Would she regret on Tuesday having accepted the contracted on Monday? Justify your responses based on your answer to question (d). Page 4 of 5 ES30037
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics 2e
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:
9781947172364
Author:
Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:
OpenStax
Microeconomic Theory
Microeconomic Theory
Economics
ISBN:
9781337517942
Author:
NICHOLSON
Publisher:
Cengage
MACROECONOMICS FOR TODAY
MACROECONOMICS FOR TODAY
Economics
ISBN:
9781337613057
Author:
Tucker
Publisher:
CENGAGE L
Micro Economics For Today
Micro Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:
9781337613064
Author:
Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Economics For Today
Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:
9781337613040
Author:
Tucker
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Survey Of Economics
Survey Of Economics
Economics
ISBN:
9781337111522
Author:
Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:
Cengage,