12. A consumer who conforms to the von Neumann-Morgenstern axioms is faced with four situations A, B, C, and D. She prefers A to B, B to C, and C to D. Experimentation reveals that the consumer is indifferent between B and a lottery ticket with probabilities of 0.4 and 0.6 for A and D respectively, and that she is indifferent between C and a lottery ticket with probabilities of 0.2 and 0.8 for B and D respectively. Construct a set of von Neumann- Morgenstern utility numbers for the four situations.

12. A consumer who conforms to the von Neumann-Morgenstern axioms is faced with four situations A, B, C, and D. She prefers A to B, B to C, and C to D. Experimentation reveals that the consumer is indifferent between B and a lottery ticket with probabilities of 0.4 and 0.6 for A and D respectively, and that she is indifferent between C and a lottery ticket with probabilities of 0.2 and 0.8 for B and D respectively. Construct a set of von Neumann- Morgenstern utility numbers for the four situations.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Problem 4 A person has been mugged in the street by a thief, and there are n witnesses. All of the witnesses prefer someone else to chase the thief but none of them want to be the person trying to catch her. Each person gets 0 utility if the crime goes unreported, v if the crime is reported by someone else, and v −c if they report the crime. Moreover, we assume that the cost of chasing the thief is less than the utility of catching the thief: c < v. a. Define the strategic game described above. b. Find players’ best responses. c. Find the Nash equilibria of the game.
A buyer wants to purchase a house from a seller. Let v be the quality of this house. The quality v is known to the seller but unobservable to the buyer. The buyer thinks the chance that v=$1k is 20%, v=$10k is 40%, and v=$50k is 40%. The seller’s valuation of the house is v and the buyer’s valuation of the house is 2v a) Suppose both the buyer and the seller see the value of v . Also suppose the transaction price equals the value of v (i.e. if =10k, then the buyer pays 10k for the house). Calculate the buyer’s expected profit before seeing the value of b) Suppose only the seller sees v. Also suppose the buyer is allowed to make any offer to the seller and the seller accepts it if the offered price is above or equals to v. What is the buyer’s profit maximizing offer? What is the buyer’s maximum profit? c) Base on your answers from (a) and (b), what is the value of information (i.e. the benefits of seeing the value of ) to the buyer?
1. Now, imagine that Port Chester decides to crack down on motorists who park illegally by increasing the number of officers issuing parking tickets (thus, raising the probability of a ticket). If the cost of a ticket is $100, and the opportunity cost for the average driver of searching for parking is $12, which of the following probabilities would make the average person stop parking illegally? Assume that people will not park illegally if the expected value of doing so is negative. Check all that apply. A. 9% B. 18% C. 17% D. 10% 2. Alternatively, the city could hold the number of officers constant and discourage parking violations by raising the fine for illegal parking. Suppose the average probability of getting caught for parking illegally is currently 10% citywide, and the average opportunity cost of parking is, again, $12. The fine that would make the average person indifferent between searching for parking and parking illegally is ____ , assuming that people will not…
Are the following preferences consistent with von Neumann Morgenstern’s axioms to maximize expected utility? Explain. a. You would rather have a sure $200 to a gamble with p=0.7 chance of $200, p=0.1 chance of $50, p=0.2 chance of $300. b. You prefer the gamble of p=2/3 chance of $300 and p=1/3 chance of $50 than a sure $250 win.
Suppose Jimi has reference dependent preferences over guitars and money as in Tversky and Kahneman (1991). His utility functions are given below. Gains Gains 400 2 -2 -2 Guitars 24 Losses Losses -600 -2 What is the least amount of money Jimi is willing to accept to sell one of his guitars? (just enter a dollar amount, i.e., "1000", not "$1000"
2. Christiaan can go hiking, or he can stay at home. Hiking would be fun if nothing bad happens, but there is a risk if he goes hiking that he will meet a bear (not fun) or get bitten by a snake (very not fun). Christiaan decides that if there is a 5% chance of meeting a bear and a 1% chance of getting bitten by a snake, he would prefer to go hiking rather than stay at home. However, if the chance of meeting a bear is 10% and the chance of a snake bite is 5%, he definitely would rather stay at home. then (a) Consider the utility function: U (stay home) = 25, U (hike no event) = 100, U (hike & snake) -1000, U (hike & bear) = -200. Does this utility function represent Christiaan's pref- erences? Explain. (b) Suppose that the utility function in (a) does represent Christiaan's preferences. Would Christiaan prefer to hike or stay home if the probability of meeting a bear is 6% and the probability of being bitten by a snake is 4%? Show your work.
A pirate is about to set sail on a 2-period journey (trip). He has 100 bags of barley (food). He must decide how much to consume in period 1 and how much to consume in period 2: (C1, c2). He gets all the barley in period 1 and none in period 2. Unfortunately, rats will eat 50% of any barley that he saves to consume in period 2. If the pirate's utility function is U(C1, C2) = C1C2, what levels of consumption does he choose in each period? (Hint: The "price" of barley in each period can be assumed to be 1.)
An individual is offered a choice of either $50 or a lottery which may result in $0 or $100, each with equal probability 1/2. If the individual has a utility function u(w) = w, which one would they choose? If the individual has a utility function u(w) =sqr(w)?
Persons A and B are roommates. Person A smokes and Person B does not. The index s measures how smoky the room is. It varies from s=0, where there is no smoke in the room, to s=1, when the room is filled with smoke. Thus, 1-s measures how "clean" the air in the room is. Person A's utility function is UA(XA,S)=XA+In(1+s), where xA is the amount of money Person A owns. Person B's utility function is uB(XB,1s)%3D3XB+2(1-s), where Xg is the amount of money Person B owns. Each person starts with an endowment of 5 units of money. Persch B has the legal right to a smoke-free room and there is a market for "emission right." At the Walrasian equilibrium, what will be the (per unit of smoke index) price p of the emission rights if the price of money is 1? O a. None of the other answers. O b. p=2/3 O c. p=1 O d. p=3/2 О е. р31/6
If a risk-neutral individual owns a home worth $200,000 and there is a three percent chance the home will be destroyed by fire in the next year, then we know 15. that: a) He is willing to pay much more than $6,000 for full cover. b) He is willing to pay much less than $6,000 for full cover. c) He is willing to pay at most $6,000 for full cover. d) None of the above are correct. e) All of the above are correct.
Persons A and B are roommates. Person A smokes and Person B does not. The index s measures how smoky the room is. It varies from s=0, when there is no smoke in the room, to s=1, when the room is filled with smoke. Thus, 1-s measures how "clean" the air in the room is. Person A's utility function is ua(XA,s)=Xa.S, where xA is the amount of money Person A owns. Person B's utility function is ug(xg, 1s)=Xg .(1-s)³, where xg is the amount of money Person B owns. Each person starts with an endowment of 5 units of money. Person A has the legal right to a fill up the room with smoke and there exists a market for smoke "abatements". At the Walrasian equilibrium, how much money will person B be left with? а. Хв31.25 ОБ. Хв32.25 O c. XB=0.25 O d. Xg=0.25 е. None of the other answers.
Draw a utility function over income u(I) that describes a man who is a risk lover when his income is low but risk averse when his income is high. 1.) Using the 3-point curved line drawing tool, draw the low income portion of his utility function. Label it U₁. 2.) Using the 3-point curved line drawing tool, draw the high income portion of his utility function. Label it UH. Carefully follow the instructions above, and only draw the required objects. C 500- 450- 400- 350- 300- 250- 200- 150- 100- 50- 0 Utility 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 Income